ICTSF vs ALRM vs SNT Stock Comparison

Icts International N V, Alarm.com Holdings and Senstar Technologies Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALRM Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
$64.59 +21.0% 1M +24.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.20B
P/E
27.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Alarm.com Holdings leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Alarm.com Holdings 8, Icts International N V 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionICTSFALRMSNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $207.76M $3.20B $35.81M ALRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.0x 27.1x 72.8x ALRM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 21.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +8.7% -3.2% ALRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 11.1% 1.3% ALRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.5% 0.7% ALRM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.6% +24.8% -69.0% ICTSF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.6%/yr -4.3%/yr -17.3%/yr ALRM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.1% 30.8% 59.0% ALRM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 70/100 50/100 ALRM

Percentile Scorecard

ICTSFALRMSNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisICTSFALRMSNT
Valuation 33 #75 of 112 86 #18 of 124 73 #31 of 112
Growth – 44 #64 of 113 3 #93 of 96
Profitability – 85 #17 of 110 36 #59 of 91
Financial Health 52 #60 of 125 58 #55 of 129 89 #15 of 125
Shareholder Returns – 79 #15 of 67 –
Overall – 70 50
  • ICTSF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ALRM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodICTSFALRMSNTSPY
1 month -5.8%+21.0%-5.6% -0.8%
3 months +0.9%+20.5%-14.1% +3.5%
6 months +27.6%+44.0%-47.2% +7.0%
Year to date +66.2%+26.6%-68.5% +12.2%
1 year +27.6%+24.8%-69.0% +13.0%
3 years +20.7%+21.0%+33.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +6.5%+6.6%+10.1% +23.1%
5 years -28.8%-19.5%-61.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year -6.6%-4.3%-17.3% +11.0%
10 years +681.7%+120.3%-65.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +22.8%+8.2%-10.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureICTSFALRMSNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.1%30.8%59.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 124.9%31.7%60.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.310.430.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.350.81-1.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.3%-52.9%-74.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.6%0.0%-69.0% -1.8%
52-week high $6.42$64.59$4.91 $779.14
52-week low $3.10$42.13$1.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleICTSFALRMSNT
P/E now vs peer median -14.0xmedian 21.9x 27.0xmedian 38.1x 72.1xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.9x 3.0xmedian 4.3x 1.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.2x 18.1xmedian 35.4x —median 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.3xmedian 14.3x 16.9xmedian 27.1x —median 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median -9.8xmedian 2.3x 3.7xmedian 3.4x 0.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 1.36median 1.27 —median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsICTSFALRMSNT
Revenue – $1.06B $36.80M
Gross profit – $698.22M $23.34M
Operating income – $136.10M $729.00K
Net income – $117.29M $378.00K
Free cash flow – $187.71M –
R&D – $275.86M $3.98M
EPS (diluted) – $2.11 $0.02
Cash & equivalents $16.89M $479.42M $7.88M
Total debt $25.53M $2.96B $1.14M
Shares (diluted) 36.18M 55.92M 23.46M
Enterprise value $95.20M $196.89M -$26.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricICTSFALRMSNT
P/E -14.0x 27.0x 72.1x
P/FCF -6.3x 16.9x –
P/Operating cash flow – 15.9x –
P/S 0.4x 3.0x 1.0x
P/B -9.8x 3.7x 0.8x
P/Tangible book -9.8x 4.1x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA – 18.1x –
EV/EBIT – 23.4x 38.2x
EV/Revenue – 3.0x 0.8x
EV/FCF – 16.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 16.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.36 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricICTSFALRMSNT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 8.7% -3.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 7.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 8.8% -7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 9.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 8.3% -86.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 34.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -8.9% -92.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 20.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -2.1% -90.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 19.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 10.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 36.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 12.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 41.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricICTSFALRMSNT
Gross margin – 65.8% 63.4%
EBITDA margin – 16.5% –
Operating margin – 12.8% 2.0%
Pretax margin – 14.4% 2.4%
Net margin – 11.1% 1.3%
FCF margin – 17.7% –
Operating cash flow margin – 18.8% –
Return on equity – 13.6% 0.9%
Return on assets – 7.1% 0.7%
Return on invested capital – 7.5% 0.7%
Return on capital employed – 9.1% 1.6%
Asset turnover – 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue – 2.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricICTSFALRMSNT
Debt / assets 4.7% 29.6% 0.8%
Debt / equity -0.4x 0.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.1x –
Debt / FCF – 2.6x –
Liabilities / assets 112.8% 47.8% 20.6%
Equity / assets -12.8% 52.2% 79.4%
Interest coverage – 8.6x –
Current ratio 1.8x 5.0x 3.6x
Quick ratio 1.6x 4.0x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.6x 3.0x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – 4.25 3.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricICTSFALRMSNT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 2.3% –
Shareholder yield – 2.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusICTSFALRMSNT
Forward P/E – 21.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.00FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +14.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +5.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.01BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +0.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersICTSFALRMSNT
Held by institutions – 98.2% –
Institutions holding – 314 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.4% –
Institutions buying – 169 –
Institutions selling – 106 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.59 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ICTSFALRMSNT
ICTSF 1.00 0.02 -0.03
ALRM 0.02 1.00 0.06
SNT -0.03 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ICTSF, ALRM and SNT?

Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Icts International N V (ICTSF) $207.76M, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) $3.20B, Senstar Technologies (SNT) $35.81M.

Which stock is cheaper, ICTSF, ALRM and SNT?

Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Icts International N V (ICTSF) -14.0x, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 27.1x, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 72.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) +8.7%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) has the highest net margin (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 11.1%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) leads (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 7.5%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Icts International N V (ICTSF) returned the most: Icts International N V (ICTSF) +27.6%, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) +24.8%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -69.0%. Over five years, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) compounded fastest (Icts International N V (ICTSF) -6.6%/yr, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) -4.3%/yr, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -17.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) has been the steadiest (Icts International N V (ICTSF) 79.1%, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 30.8%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ICTSF, ALRM and SNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.