ICTSF vs ADT vs SNT Stock Comparison

Icts International N V, Adt and Senstar Technologies Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ADT ADT Inc.
$6.88 +7.3% 1M -21.5% 1Y
Market cap
$5.24B
P/E
8.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.16B
Div. yield
–
Security Services Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Adt leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Adt 8, Icts International N V 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionICTSFADTSNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $207.76M $5.24B $35.02M ADT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.0x 8.6x 71.2x ADT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +2.1% -3.2% ADT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 11.9% 1.3% ADT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.2% 0.7% ADT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.6% -21.5% -69.0% ICTSF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.6%/yr -3.5%/yr -17.3%/yr ADT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.1% 29.9% 59.0% ADT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 68/100 50/100 ADT

Percentile Scorecard

ICTSFADTSNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisICTSFADTSNT
Valuation 33 #75 of 112 96 #5 of 112 73 #31 of 112
Growth – 50 #49 of 96 3 #93 of 96
Profitability – 91 #9 of 91 36 #59 of 91
Financial Health 52 #60 of 125 13 #109 of 125 89 #15 of 125
Shareholder Returns – 92 #6 of 67 –
Overall – 68 50
  • ICTSF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ADT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodICTSFADTSNTSPY
1 month -5.8%+7.3%-5.6% -0.8%
3 months +0.9%-3.8%-14.1% +3.5%
6 months +27.6%-4.7%-47.2% +7.0%
Year to date +66.2%-14.7%-68.5% +12.2%
1 year +27.6%-21.5%-69.0% +13.0%
3 years +20.7%+20.9%+33.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +6.5%+6.5%+10.1% +23.1%
5 years -28.8%-16.2%-61.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year -6.6%-3.5%-17.3% +11.0%
10 years +681.7%—-65.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +22.8%—-10.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureICTSFADTSNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.1%29.9%59.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 124.9%35.4%60.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.310.700.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.35-0.72-1.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.3%-49.2%-74.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.6%-22.2%-69.0% -1.8%
52-week high $6.42$8.84$4.91 $779.14
52-week low $3.10$6.08$1.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleICTSFADTSNT
P/E now vs peer median -14.0xmedian 21.9x 8.5xmedian 21.9x 72.1xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x 1.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.2x 4.3xmedian 12.2x —median 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.3xmedian 14.3x 2.4xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median -9.8xmedian 2.3x 1.3xmedian 2.3x 0.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 0.05median 1.02 —median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsICTSFADTSNT
Revenue – $5.16B $36.80M
Gross profit – $4.17B $23.34M
Operating income – $1.29B $729.00K
Net income – $612.75M $378.00K
Free cash flow – $1.97B –
R&D – – $3.98M
EPS (diluted) – $0.75 $0.02
Cash & equivalents $16.89M $3.88M $7.88M
Total debt $25.53M $7.69B $1.14M
Shares (diluted) 36.18M 820.13M 23.46M
Enterprise value $95.20M $4.97B -$27.70M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricICTSFADTSNT
P/E -14.0x 8.5x 72.1x
P/FCF -6.3x 2.4x –
P/Operating cash flow – 2.2x –
P/S 0.4x 0.9x 1.0x
P/B -9.8x 1.3x 0.8x
P/Tangible book -9.8x -3.5x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA – 4.3x –
EV/EBIT – 9.6x 38.2x
EV/Revenue – 2.4x 0.8x
EV/FCF – 6.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 5.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.05 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricICTSFADTSNT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 2.1% -3.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 1.3% -7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -1.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -0.3% -86.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 19.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -1.6% -92.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 164.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 0.8% -90.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 178.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 8.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 7.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricICTSFADTSNT
Gross margin – 80.7% 63.4%
EBITDA margin – 55.6% –
Operating margin – 25.0% 2.0%
Pretax margin – 16.6% 2.4%
Net margin – 11.9% 1.3%
FCF margin – 38.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 41.8% –
Return on equity – 16.8% 0.9%
Return on assets – 3.9% 0.7%
Return on invested capital – 8.2% 0.7%
Return on capital employed – 8.8% 1.6%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 3.5x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricICTSFADTSNT
Debt / assets 4.7% 48.8% 0.8%
Debt / equity -0.4x 2.2x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.7x –
Debt / FCF – 3.9x –
Liabilities / assets 112.8% 77.9% 20.6%
Equity / assets -12.8% 22.1% 79.4%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.8x 0.7x 3.6x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.4x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.0x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – 0.56 3.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricICTSFADTSNT
Dividend yield – 3.4% –
Net buyback yield – 15.2% –
Shareholder yield – 18.7% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusICTSFADTSNT
Forward P/E – 8.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.86FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -3.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +19.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.95BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – -3.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +12.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersICTSFADTSNT
Held by institutions – 94.5% –
Institutions holding – 456 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.7% –
Institutions buying – 297 –
Institutions selling – 125 –
Buyers to sellers – 2.38 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ICTSFADTSNT
ICTSF 1.00 -0.18 -0.03
ADT -0.18 1.00 0.02
SNT -0.03 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ICTSF, ADT and SNT?

Adt (ADT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Icts International N V (ICTSF) $207.76M, Adt (ADT) $5.24B, Senstar Technologies (SNT) $35.02M.

Which stock is cheaper, ICTSF, ADT and SNT?

Adt (ADT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Icts International N V (ICTSF) -14.0x, Adt (ADT) 8.6x, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 71.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Adt (ADT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Adt (ADT) +2.1%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Adt (ADT) has the highest net margin (Adt (ADT) 11.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Adt (ADT) leads (Adt (ADT) 8.2%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Icts International N V (ICTSF) returned the most: Icts International N V (ICTSF) +27.6%, Adt (ADT) -21.5%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -69.0%. Over five years, Adt (ADT) compounded fastest (Icts International N V (ICTSF) -6.6%/yr, Adt (ADT) -3.5%/yr, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -17.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Adt (ADT) has been the steadiest (Icts International N V (ICTSF) 79.1%, Adt (ADT) 29.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ICTSF, ADT and SNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Adt (ADT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.