ICLR vs NTRB vs MEDP Stock Comparison

Icon, NutriBand and Medpace Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ICLR Icon Plc
$214.16 +22.0% 1M +20.5% 1Y
Market cap
$16.40B
P/E
37.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.23B
Div. yield
–
Contract Research Healthcare
2 wins
NTRB NutriBand Inc.
$6.49 -21.1% 1M -16.4% 1Y
Market cap
$78.89M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
2 wins
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc.
$692.68 +12.5% 1M +19.3% 1Y
Market cap
$19.37B
P/E
37.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.84B
Div. yield
–
Contract Research Healthcare
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Medpace Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Medpace Holdings 6, NutriBand 2, Icon 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionICLRNTRBMEDPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.40B $78.89M $19.37B MEDP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.4x -11.3x 37.4x MEDP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.9x 3.9x 38.9x NTRB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.8% -37.3% +20.4% MEDP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.4% -430.4% 18.2% MEDP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 0.5x — NTRB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.5% -16.4% +19.3% ICLR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.7%/yr +3.9%/yr +25.1%/yr MEDP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.3% 79.8% 45.5% MEDP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 50/100 78/100 ICLR

Percentile Scorecard

ICLRNTRBMEDP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisICLRNTRBMEDP
Valuation 100 #1 of 11 55 #285 of 625 60 #5 of 11
Growth 70 #4 of 11 43 #345 of 602 100 #1 of 11
Profitability 80 #3 of 11 36 #354 of 549 100 #1 of 11
Financial Health 75 #4 of 13 68 #209 of 654 50 #7 of 13
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 81 50 78
  • ICLR ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services
  • NTRB ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • MEDP ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodICLRNTRBMEDPSPY
1 month +22.0%-21.1%+12.5% +0.9%
3 months +20.2%+125.3%+18.4% +5.9%
6 months +84.4%+71.2%+67.5% +8.5%
Year to date +17.5%+43.0%+23.3% +13.3%
1 year +20.5%-16.4%+19.3% +12.4%
3 years -9.0%+207.6%+176.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year -3.1%+45.5%+40.4% +23.5%
5 years -25.3%+20.9%+205.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year -5.7%+3.9%+25.1% +11.0%
10 years +166.6%—+2,297.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year +10.3%—+37.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureICLRNTRBMEDPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.3%79.8%45.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 87.9%75.3%54.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.481.030.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.27-0.200.42 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.9%-77.7%-42.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-27.8%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $214.16$8.99$692.68 $779.14
52-week low $80.08$2.81$393.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleICLRNTRBMEDP
P/E now vs peer median 37.4xmedian 37.4x -11.3xmedian 17.4x 37.4xmedian 37.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.7x 48.8xmedian 9.1x 6.8xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 39.5x -11.0xmedian 17.1x 29.4xmedian 39.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.1xmedian 22.1x -21.7xmedian 19.0x 29.0xmedian 22.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 3.4x 14.8xmedian 2.2x 33.1xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median -15.76median 2.08 -13.80median 0.34 1.31median 2.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsICLRNTRBMEDP
Revenue $8.23B $1.62M $2.84B
Gross profit $1.93B $536.12K $827.16M
Operating income $718.25M -$7.05M $607.14M
Net income $448.66M -$6.96M $517.83M
Free cash flow $857.06M -$3.63M $667.63M
R&D – $1.21M –
EPS (diluted) $5.68 $-0.57 $18.25
Cash & equivalents $808.98M $3.42M $705.32M
Total debt $3.38B $647.66K –
Shares (diluted) 78.97M 12.16M 28.37M
Enterprise value $13.17B $61.58M $17.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricICLRNTRBMEDP
P/E 37.4x -11.3x 37.4x
P/FCF 19.1x -21.7x 29.0x
P/Operating cash flow 16.0x -21.7x 26.8x
P/S 2.0x 48.8x 6.8x
P/B 1.8x 14.8x 33.1x
P/Tangible book 2.7x 15.3x 35.1x
EV/EBITDA 17.3x -11.0x 29.4x
EV/EBIT 26.4x -10.7x 30.7x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 46.7x 6.6x
EV/FCF 22.1x -20.8x 28.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.5x -20.8x 25.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -15.76 -13.80 1.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricICLRNTRBMEDP
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.8% -37.3% 20.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.9% -10.8% 16.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -13.4% -39.5% 12.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -6.5% -16.5% 18.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 53.9% 32.3% 19.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% -15.3% 23.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 55.9% 32.2% 19.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -4.4% -14.8% 23.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.1% 80.0% 21.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 0.8% 28.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -9.9% 25.9% 1.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.8% -5.7% 20.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -11.1% 26.6% -1.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.4% -5.5% 20.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricICLRNTRBMEDP
Gross margin 23.4% 33.1% 29.1%
EBITDA margin 13.3% -426.5% 22.4%
Operating margin 8.7% -435.6% 21.4%
Pretax margin 6.3% -430.4% 22.1%
Net margin 5.4% -430.4% 18.2%
FCF margin 10.4% -224.5% 23.5%
Operating cash flow margin 12.5% -224.5% 25.5%
Return on equity 7.6% -123.0% 101.7%
Return on assets 4.3% -105.6% 23.8%
Return on invested capital 4.7% – –
Return on capital employed 5.3% -123.9% 88.8%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 0.5x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 204.1% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricICLRNTRBMEDP
Debt / assets 20.8% 2.4% –
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 0.5x –
Debt / FCF 3.9x 0.0x –
Liabilities / assets 43.8% 15.3% 74.6%
Equity / assets 56.2% 84.7% 25.4%
Interest coverage 3.4x -339.3x –
Current ratio 1.3x 4.2x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.9x 3.8x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 3.8x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 2.27 35.34 8.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricICLRNTRBMEDP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 2.3% – 1.3%
Shareholder yield 2.3% – 1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusICLRNTRBMEDP
Forward P/E 20.9xFY2026 3.9xFY2026 38.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.25FY2026 $1.65FY2026 $17.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.2%FY2026 – +16.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.2% +112.1% +6.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.52BFY2026 $90.32MFY2026 $2.94BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +4,334.5%FY2026 +16.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.2% +109.8% +6.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersICLRNTRBMEDP
Held by institutions 100.0% – 87.8%
Institutions holding 422 – 693
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.5% – +3.2%
Institutions buying 233 – 279
Institutions selling 138 – 302
Buyers to sellers 1.69 – 0.92

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ICLRNTRBMEDP
ICLR 1.00 0.17 0.38
NTRB 0.17 1.00 0.07
MEDP 0.38 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ICLR, NTRB and MEDP?

Medpace Holdings (MEDP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Icon (ICLR) $16.40B, NutriBand (NTRB) $78.89M, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) $19.37B.

Which stock is cheaper, ICLR, NTRB and MEDP?

Medpace Holdings (MEDP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Icon (ICLR) 37.4x, NutriBand (NTRB) -11.3x, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) 37.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, NutriBand (NTRB) is cheapest (Icon (ICLR) 20.9x, NutriBand (NTRB) 3.9x, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) 38.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Medpace Holdings (MEDP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Icon (ICLR) +1.8%, NutriBand (NTRB) -37.3%, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) +20.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Medpace Holdings (MEDP) has the highest net margin (Icon (ICLR) 5.4%, NutriBand (NTRB) -430.4%, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) 18.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Icon (ICLR) returned the most: Icon (ICLR) +20.5%, NutriBand (NTRB) -16.4%, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) +19.3%. Over five years, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) compounded fastest (Icon (ICLR) -5.7%/yr, NutriBand (NTRB) +3.9%/yr, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) +25.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) has been the steadiest (Icon (ICLR) 75.3%, NutriBand (NTRB) 79.8%, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) 45.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ICLR, NTRB and MEDP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Medpace Holdings (MEDP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.