ICL vs SQM vs BGM Stock Comparison

Icl, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile and Bgm Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ICL ICL Group Ltd.
$4.59 -11.4% 1M -30.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.92B
P/E
8.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.71B
Div. yield
13.73%
Fertilizers Basic Materials
4 wins
BGM BGM Group Ltd.
$8.93 +3,472.0% 1M -3.7% 1Y
Market cap
$33.71M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile 6, Icl 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionICLSQMBGMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.92B $16.10B $33.71M SQM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.6x 11.6x — ICL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.5x 7.9x — SQM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.9% +59.0% — SQM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.0% 20.6% — SQM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 22.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 13.73% 4.29% 0.00% ICL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.2% +22.4% -3.7% SQM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.0%/yr +0.5%/yr — SQM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.4% 47.5% 379.7% ICL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 82/100 70/100 — ICL

Percentile Scorecard

ICLSQMBGM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisICLSQMBGM
Valuation 98 #3 of 94 81 #32 of 163 –
Growth 48 #48 of 92 63 #55 of 148 –
Profitability 82 #16 of 86 82 #23 of 123 –
Financial Health – 31 #113 of 164 60 #258 of 647
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 71 91 #11 of 108 –
Overall 82 70 –
  • ICL ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • SQM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • BGM ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodICLSQMBGMSPY
1 month -11.4%-14.7%+3,472.0% +0.7%
3 months -11.6%-17.6%+3,207.4% +3.7%
6 months -16.4%-38.8%+2,947.8% +7.1%
Year to date -19.6%-18.1%+142.0% +12.8%
1 year -30.2%+22.4%-3.7% +11.9%
3 years -6.9%+15.7%— +85.2%
3 years, per year -2.4%+5.0%— +22.8%
5 years -47.1%+2.7%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -12.0%+0.5%— +10.9%
10 years +27.5%+89.8%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +2.5%+6.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureICLSQMBGMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.4%47.5%379.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.3%44.1%158.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.770.981.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.770.47-0.01 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.0%-73.5%-98.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.7%-40.8%-16.9% -1.2%
52-week high $6.82$95.31$10.75 $779.14
52-week low $4.59$46.07$0.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleICLSQMBGM
P/E now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 21.0x 11.6xmedian 13.2x —median 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.4x 2.4xmedian 3.1x —median 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.9x 4.8xmedian 7.2x —median 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 15.5x —median 15.2x —median 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.7x 1.9xmedian 2.2x 0.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.52median 1.68 -0.74median 0.30 —median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsICLSQMBGM
Revenue $7.71B $6.73B –
Gross profit $2.36B $2.83B –
Operating income $715.00M $3.11B –
Net income $654.00M $1.39B –
Free cash flow $1.19B – –
EPS (diluted) $0.54 $4.86 –
Cash & equivalents $496.00M $3.38B $11.52M
Total debt – $19.72B $8.25M
Shares (diluted) 1.29B 285.64M 3.78M
Enterprise value $2.62B $5.13B -$19.80M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricICLSQMBGM
P/E 8.6x 11.6x –
P/FCF 5.0x – –
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S 0.8x 2.4x –
P/B – 1.9x 0.1x
P/Tangible book – 1.9x 0.1x
EV/EBITDA – 4.8x –
EV/EBIT 7.6x 5.5x –
EV/Revenue 0.7x 2.5x –
EV/FCF 4.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.52 -0.74 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricICLSQMBGM
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.9% 59.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.8% -4.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.2% 150.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.2% -9.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -1.7% 134.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -20.8% -17.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) -1.7% 190.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -18.0% -7.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 88.4% 190.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -16.4% -15.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -17.5% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.0% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricICLSQMBGM
Gross margin 30.6% 42.1% –
EBITDA margin – 52.7% –
Operating margin 9.3% 46.2% –
Pretax margin 9.9% 36.6% –
Net margin 9.0% 20.6% –
FCF margin 15.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – 16.4% –
Return on assets – 8.6% –
Return on invested capital – 22.8% –
Return on capital employed – 23.4% –
Asset turnover – 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricICLSQMBGM
Debt / assets – 31.3% 0.2%
Debt / equity – 0.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.2x –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets – 47.9% 8.4%
Equity / assets – 52.1% 91.6%
Interest coverage – 15.3x –
Current ratio – 2.6x 1.3x
Quick ratio – 1.8x 0.4x
Cash ratio – 1.5x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricICLSQMBGM
Dividend yield 13.7% 4.3% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 13.7% 4.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusICLSQMBGM
Forward P/E 11.5xFY2026 7.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.40FY2026 $7.12FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +11.1%FY2026 +245.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +12.5% -2.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.47BFY2026 $8.37BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +4.5%FY2026 +82.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +13.0% +2.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersICLSQMBGM
Held by institutions 13.7% 13.4% –
Institutions holding 221 317 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -13.5% -3.0% –
Institutions buying 140 166 –
Institutions selling 56 101 –
Buyers to sellers 2.50 1.64 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ICLSQMBGM
ICL 1.00 0.32 -0.01
SQM 0.32 1.00 -0.01
BGM -0.01 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ICL, SQM and BGM?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Icl (ICL) $5.92B, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) $16.10B, Bgm (BGM) $33.71M.

Which stock is cheaper, ICL, SQM and BGM?

Icl (ICL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Icl (ICL) 8.6x, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 11.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is cheapest (Icl (ICL) 11.5x, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 7.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Icl (ICL) +10.9%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +59.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) has the highest net margin (Icl (ICL) 9.0%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 20.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) returned the most: Icl (ICL) -30.2%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +22.4%, Bgm (BGM) -3.7%. Over five years, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) compounded fastest (Icl (ICL) -12.0%/yr, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +0.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Icl (ICL) has the highest dividend yield: Icl (ICL) 13.73%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 4.29%, Bgm (BGM) 0.00%. Bgm (BGM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Icl (ICL) has been the steadiest (Icl (ICL) 39.4%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 47.5%, Bgm (BGM) 379.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ICL, SQM and BGM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.