ICE vs MSCI vs TW Stock Comparison

Intercontinental Exchange, Msci and Tradeweb Markets Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MSCI MSCI Inc.
$601.75 +9.1% 1M +10.0% 1Y
Market cap
$43.15B
P/E
31.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.43B
Div. yield
1.32%
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
3 wins
TW Tradeweb Markets Inc.
$119.67 +18.3% 1M +8.9% 1Y
Market cap
$28.02B
P/E
28.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.21B
Div. yield
0.45%
Exchanges Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Intercontinental Exchange leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Intercontinental Exchange 5, Tradeweb Markets 4, Msci 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionICEMSCITWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $87.19B $43.15B $28.02B ICE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.7x 31.4x 28.3x ICE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.9x 29.0x 28.5x ICE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.9% +12.3% +14.0% TW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.1% 40.3% 40.7% TW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.5% 44.1% — MSCI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x 3.1x — ICE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.31% 1.32% 0.45% MSCI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -2.8% +10.0% +8.9% MSCI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.8%/yr -1.7%/yr +6.5%/yr TW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.8% 30.9% 31.0% ICE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 53/100 73/100 TW

Percentile Scorecard

ICEMSCITW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisICEMSCITW
Valuation 59 #40 of 96 23 #727 of 940 48 #50 of 96
Growth 45 #37 of 66 58 #275 of 655 63 #25 of 66
Profitability 83 #12 of 64 97 #19 of 633 95 #4 of 64
Financial Health 36 #60 of 93 26 #526 of 714 98 #3 of 93
Shareholder Returns 46 #21 of 38 61 #275 of 709 60 #16 of 38
Overall 54 53 73
  • ICE ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • MSCI ranked among 1,003 companies in Financial Services
  • TW ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodICEMSCITWSPY
1 month +0.7%+9.1%+18.3% -0.2%
3 months +1.7%+3.8%+14.8% +3.9%
6 months -0.6%+1.2%+6.5% +8.2%
Year to date -4.0%+4.9%+11.3% +12.9%
1 year -2.8%+10.0%+8.9% +12.3%
3 years +48.4%+26.4%+36.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year +14.1%+8.1%+10.9% +23.3%
5 years +14.7%-8.2%+36.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +2.8%-1.7%+6.5% +10.9%
10 years +192.0%+656.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +11.3%+22.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureICEMSCITWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.8%30.9%31.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.5%31.9%31.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.160.30-0.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.110.320.29 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.1%-43.9%-48.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.2%-6.5%-5.5% -1.2%
52-week high $175.10$643.83$126.57 $779.14
52-week low $122.91$511.84$91.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleICEMSCITW
P/E now vs peer median 21.7xmedian 28.3x 31.4xmedian 13.0x 28.3xmedian 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 2.9x 12.6xmedian 3.2x 12.7xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 13.5x 23.4xmedian 7.4x 21.4xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.2xmedian 16.0x 27.4xmedian 10.8x 24.5xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 2.4x -14.3xmedian 1.2x 3.8xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.65median 0.54 1.89median 0.87 0.73median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsICEMSCITW
Revenue $13.43B $3.43B $2.21B
Gross profit – $2.85B –
Operating income $5.47B $1.91B $963.90M
Net income $4.10B $1.38B $1.02B
Free cash flow $5.08B $1.58B $1.14B
R&D – $184.30M –
EPS (diluted) $7.13 $19.14 $4.22
Cash & equivalents $1.07B $261.00M $2.06B
Total debt $19.85B $6.72B –
Shares (diluted) 566.00M 72.30M 212.80M
Enterprise value $80.99B $41.63B $20.73B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricICEMSCITW
P/E 21.7x 31.4x 28.3x
P/FCF 17.2x 27.4x 24.5x
P/Operating cash flow 15.8x 26.7x 23.4x
P/S 6.5x 12.6x 12.7x
P/B 2.9x -14.3x 3.8x
P/Tangible book 5.9x -11.0x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 15.0x 23.4x 21.4x
EV/EBIT 19.2x 26.0x 26.9x
EV/Revenue 7.8x 14.5x 11.8x
EV/FCF 20.7x 31.5x 22.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.1x 30.7x 21.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.65 1.89 0.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricICEMSCITW
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.9% 12.3% 14.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.9% 12.4% 21.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 13.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.4% 15.4% 28.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.9% 13.0% 30.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 34.1% 13.1% 60.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 33.1% 13.0% 38.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.6% 19.8% 62.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.3% 16.6% 39.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 13.1% 6.4% 14.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 11.6% 19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.9% 6.7% 13.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.1% 11.4% 19.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricICEMSCITW
Gross margin – 82.9% –
EBITDA margin 52.3% 61.6% 54.9%
Operating margin 40.7% 55.7% 43.7%
Pretax margin 39.7% 47.3% 58.9%
Net margin 30.1% 40.3% 40.7%
FCF margin 37.8% 45.9% 51.9%
Operating cash flow margin 41.1% 47.0% 54.2%
Return on equity 13.9% – 13.9%
Return on assets 2.3% 24.7% 12.3%
Return on invested capital 8.5% 44.1% –
Return on capital employed 9.7% 47.5% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.2x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% 3.7% 5.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricICEMSCITW
Debt / assets 11.4% 120.0% –
Debt / equity 0.7x -2.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x 3.1x –
Debt / FCF 3.9x 4.3x –
Liabilities / assets 83.0% 153.9% 11.1%
Equity / assets 17.0% -53.9% 88.9%
Interest coverage 6.8x 6.9x 469.3x
Current ratio 1.0x 0.8x –
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x –
Altman Z-score 0.73 6.21 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricICEMSCITW
Dividend yield 1.3% 1.3% 0.5%
Net buyback yield 2.3% 4.7% 1.2%
Shareholder yield 3.6% 6.0% 1.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 27.8% 42.1% 10.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 22.5% 37.0% 9.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.1% 6.7% 18.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.3% 10.5% 15.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusICEMSCITW
Forward P/E 17.9xFY2026 29.0xFY2026 28.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.69FY2026 $20.78FY2026 $4.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +25.0%FY2026 +20.3%FY2026 +21.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.2% +5.3% +17.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.54BFY2026 $3.73BFY2026 $2.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.1%FY2026 +19.2%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.0% +9.7% +21.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersICEMSCITW
Held by institutions 92.5% 92.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,653 1,080 561
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +3.6% +0.3%
Institutions buying 735 512 300
Institutions selling 694 407 211
Buyers to sellers 1.06 1.26 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ICEMSCITW
ICE 1.00 0.52 0.45
MSCI 0.52 1.00 0.40
TW 0.45 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ICE, MSCI and TW?

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) $87.19B, Msci (MSCI) $43.15B, Tradeweb Markets (TW) $28.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, ICE, MSCI and TW?

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 21.7x, Msci (MSCI) 31.4x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 28.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) is cheapest (Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 17.9x, Msci (MSCI) 29.0x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 28.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tradeweb Markets (TW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) +6.9%, Msci (MSCI) +12.3%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +14.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tradeweb Markets (TW) has the highest net margin (Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 30.1%, Msci (MSCI) 40.3%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 40.7%). On return on invested capital, Msci (MSCI) leads (Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 8.5%, Msci (MSCI) 44.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Msci (MSCI) returned the most: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) -2.8%, Msci (MSCI) +10.0%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +8.9%. Over five years, Tradeweb Markets (TW) compounded fastest (Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) +2.8%/yr, Msci (MSCI) -1.7%/yr, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Msci (MSCI) has the highest dividend yield: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 1.31%, Msci (MSCI) 1.32%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 0.45%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has been the steadiest (Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 25.8%, Msci (MSCI) 30.9%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 31.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ICE, MSCI and TW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.