ICCC vs ZTS vs NEOG Stock Comparison

Immucell, Zoetis and Neogen Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ICCC Immucell Corp /De/
$10.32 +3.8% 1M +71.1% 1Y
Market cap
$93.73M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$26.76M
Div. yield
–
Animal Health Healthcare
3 wins
ZTS Zoetis Inc.
$78.79 +12.0% 1M -45.3% 1Y
Market cap
$32.63B
P/E
12.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.52B
Div. yield
2.65%
Animal Health Healthcare
6 wins
NEOG Neogen Corp
$12.26 -3.7% 1M +96.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.68B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$883.99M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Zoetis leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Zoetis 6, Immucell 3, Neogen 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionICCCZTSNEOGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $93.73M $32.63B $2.68B ZTS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -143.4x 12.6x -47.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.4x 38.3x ZTS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -5.3% +1.5% -0.3% ZTS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.4% 27.5% -6.3% ZTS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.5% 23.4% -0.2% ZTS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 1.8x 5.4x ICCC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.65% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +71.1% -45.3% +96.8% NEOG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.2%/yr -18.3%/yr -22.0%/yr ICCC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.5% 40.6% 55.7% ZTS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 72/100 57/100 ICCC

Percentile Scorecard

ICCCZTSNEOG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisICCCZTSNEOG
Valuation 86 #89 of 624 88 #75 of 624 73 #62 of 227
Growth 65 #209 of 601 52 #289 of 601 49 #111 of 218
Profitability 83 #92 of 541 96 #22 of 541 63 #76 of 202
Financial Health 58 #273 of 647 34 #428 of 647 47 #125 of 233
Shareholder Returns – 89 #39 of 359 55 #59 of 130
Overall 73 72 57
  • ICCC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ZTS ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NEOG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodICCCZTSNEOGSPY
1 month +3.8%+12.0%-3.7% +0.7%
3 months -6.7%+3.6%+6.3% +3.7%
6 months +22.0%-31.5%+30.4% +7.1%
Year to date +67.8%-37.4%+75.4% +12.8%
1 year +71.1%-45.3%+96.8% +11.9%
3 years +109.3%-49.8%-18.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +27.9%-20.5%-6.6% +22.8%
5 years +17.3%-63.6%-71.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.2%-18.3%-22.0% +10.9%
10 years +83.3%+62.3%-37.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year +6.2%+5.0%-4.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureICCCZTSNEOGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.5%40.6%55.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.6%49.4%46.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.410.521.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.41-1.111.74 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.0%-72.0%-90.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.9%-45.4%-12.3% -1.2%
52-week high $11.72$144.35$13.98 $779.14
52-week low $4.56$69.12$5.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleICCCZTSNEOG
P/E now vs peer median -143.4xmedian 17.8x 12.6xmedian 17.8x -47.7xmedian 28.7x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 9.1x 3.4xmedian 9.1x 3.0xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 15.0x 9.8xmedian 15.0x 29.6xmedian 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.7x 14.1xmedian 21.7x 53.7xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 2.2x 10.4xmedian 2.2x 1.3xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -2.61median 0.35 1.34median 0.35 1.70median 0.99

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsICCCZTSNEOG
Revenue $26.76M $9.52B $883.99M
Gross profit $10.53M $6.81B $418.98M
Operating income $2.47M $3.59B -$7.38M
Net income -$652.35K $2.62B -$56.10M
Free cash flow – $2.32B $49.80M
R&D $2.40M $722.00M $19.76M
EPS (diluted) $-0.07 $6.26 $-0.26
Cash & equivalents $8.86M $1.48B $172.00M
Total debt $8.30M $9.05B $774.20M
Shares (diluted) 9.19M 417.70M 218.10M
Enterprise value $71.18M $24.48B $2.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricICCCZTSNEOG
P/E -143.4x 12.6x -47.7x
P/FCF – 14.1x 53.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 11.5x 31.4x
P/S 3.5x 3.4x 3.0x
P/B 3.0x 10.4x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 3.0x 14.6x 3.4x
EV/EBITDA 18.3x 9.8x 29.6x
EV/EBIT 37.8x 11.1x -444.4x
EV/Revenue 3.5x 4.2x 3.7x
EV/FCF – 17.3x 65.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 14.1x 38.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.61 1.34 1.70

Growth

14 metrics
MetricICCCZTSNEOG
Revenue growth (1Y) -5.3% 1.5% -0.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.5% 5.0% -1.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.6% 1.8% 1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 36.0% 5.7% -3.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 42.3% -0.1% 99.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.3% 5.2% -29.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -137.0% 0.6% 94.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 52.3% 5.7% -28.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -136.4% 7.7% 94.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 55.0% 9.4% -28.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -4.6% -1.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.4% 2.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 2.1% 1,631%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 21.7% 126.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricICCCZTSNEOG
Gross margin 39.3% 71.5% 47.4%
EBITDA margin 19.0% 42.8% 12.5%
Operating margin 9.2% 37.7% -0.8%
Pretax margin -2.2% 34.4% -7.7%
Net margin -2.4% 27.5% -6.3%
FCF margin – 24.3% 5.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 29.8% 9.6%
Return on equity -2.2% 82.0% -2.7%
Return on assets -1.5% 17.3% -1.7%
Return on invested capital 6.5% 23.4% -0.2%
Return on capital employed 6.1% 27.5% -0.2%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.1x -1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 1.0% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricICCCZTSNEOG
Debt / assets 17.8% 60.0% 23.4%
Debt / equity 0.3x 2.9x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 1.8x 5.4x
Debt / FCF – 3.9x 15.5x
Liabilities / assets 32.7% 79.1% 36.8%
Equity / assets 67.3% 20.9% 63.2%
Interest coverage 5.3x 15.1x –
Current ratio 4.8x 3.1x 3.9x
Quick ratio 2.7x 1.6x 2.1x
Cash ratio 2.0x 0.8x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 4.52 4.76 1.50

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricICCCZTSNEOG
Dividend yield – 2.7% –
Net buyback yield – 11.2% -0.1%
Shareholder yield – 13.8% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 34.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 38.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusICCCZTSNEOG
Forward P/E – 13.4xFY2026 38.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.86FY2026 $0.32FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -8.6%FY2026 0.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +13.0% +31.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $9.57BFY2026 $847.28MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.0%FY2026 -2.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -7.9% -1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersICCCZTSNEOG
Held by institutions 15.0% 94.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 32 1,418 315
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.6% -2.6% +1.6%
Institutions buying 15 675 151
Institutions selling 7 582 106
Buyers to sellers 2.14 1.16 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ICCCZTSNEOG
ICCC 1.00 0.09 0.15
ZTS 0.09 1.00 0.24
NEOG 0.15 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ICCC, ZTS and NEOG?

Zoetis (ZTS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Immucell (ICCC) $93.73M, Zoetis (ZTS) $32.63B, Neogen (NEOG) $2.68B.

Which company is growing faster?

Zoetis (ZTS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Immucell (ICCC) -5.3%, Zoetis (ZTS) +1.5%, Neogen (NEOG) -0.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zoetis (ZTS) has the highest net margin (Immucell (ICCC) -2.4%, Zoetis (ZTS) 27.5%, Neogen (NEOG) -6.3%). On return on invested capital, Zoetis (ZTS) leads (Immucell (ICCC) 6.5%, Zoetis (ZTS) 23.4%, Neogen (NEOG) -0.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Neogen (NEOG) returned the most: Immucell (ICCC) +71.1%, Zoetis (ZTS) -45.3%, Neogen (NEOG) +96.8%. Over five years, Immucell (ICCC) compounded fastest (Immucell (ICCC) +3.2%/yr, Zoetis (ZTS) -18.3%/yr, Neogen (NEOG) -22.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Zoetis (ZTS) 2.65%. Immucell (ICCC) and Neogen (NEOG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zoetis (ZTS) has been the steadiest (Immucell (ICCC) 50.5%, Zoetis (ZTS) 40.6%, Neogen (NEOG) 55.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ICCC, ZTS and NEOG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zoetis (ZTS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.