HYSR vs JKS vs NEWH Stock Comparison

Sunhydrogen, JinkoSolar Holding and NewHydrogen Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HYSR Sunhydrogen, Inc.
$0.02 0.0% 1M -33.3% 1Y
Market cap
$89.64M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.25K
Div. yield
–
Fuel Cells Industrials
NEWH NewHydrogen, Inc.
$0.03 +50.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.08M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Hydrogen Energy
2 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

JinkoSolar Holding leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (JinkoSolar Holding 4, NewHydrogen 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHYSRJKSNEWHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $89.64M $537.70M $20.08M JKS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.7x -5.2x -5.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -14.6% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -522,521.9% -1.3% — JKS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -33.3% -57.2% 0.0% NEWH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -22.2%/yr -28.3%/yr +8.5%/yr NEWH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 141.6% 61.2% 272.5% JKS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 51/100 17/100 JKS

Percentile Scorecard

HYSRJKSNEWH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHYSRJKSNEWH
Valuation 37 #40 of 63 95 #4 of 63 20 #9 of 11
Growth 19 #49 of 60 20 #48 of 60 10 #10 of 11
Profitability 5 #54 of 57 57 #25 of 57 –
Financial Health 99 #2 of 72 30 #51 of 72 20 #9 of 11
Shareholder Returns 65 #12 of 32 – –
Overall 45 51 17
  • HYSR ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • JKS ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • NEWH ranked among 11 companies in Renewable Fuels

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHYSRJKSNEWHSPY
1 month 0.0%+15.5%+50.0% -1.0%
3 months 0.0%-32.7%+200.0% -0.4%
6 months -33.3%-55.2%0.0% +4.5%
Year to date -33.3%-58.9%+50.0% +12.4%
1 year -33.3%-57.2%0.0% +13.6%
3 years +100.0%-69.2%+200.0% +76.4%
3 years, per year +26.0%-32.5%+44.3% +20.8%
5 years -71.4%-81.1%+50.0% +63.7%
5 years, per year -22.2%-28.3%+8.5% +10.4%
10 years +100.0%-27.7%-66.7% +267.7%
10 years, per year +7.2%-3.2%-10.4% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureHYSRJKSNEWHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 141.6%61.2%272.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 620.4%61.1%911.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.491.610.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.24-0.930.00 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.9%-89.4%-83.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.0%-65.3%-25.0% -1.6%
52-week high $0.04$30.58$0.04 $779.14
52-week low $0.02$8.02$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHYSRJKSNEWH
P/E now vs peer median -16.9xmedian 26.4x -5.3xmedian 26.4x -6.3xmedian 10.9x
P/S now vs peer median 91,987xmedian 2.6x 0.1xmedian 2.6x —median 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -11.0xmedian 19.6x —median 19.6x -6.3xmedian 15.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -22.7xmedian 29.9x —median 29.9x -9.7xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.8x 0.1xmedian 1.8x -7.6xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.17median 0.71 0.18median 0.71 -0.38median 0.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHYSRJKSNEWH
Revenue $1.25K $8.13B –
Gross profit – $480.41M –
Operating income -$7.52M $156.82M -$3.88M
Net income -$6.53M -$1.15B -$3.88M
Free cash flow -$5.07M – -$2.54M
R&D $4.33M $135.86M $1.30M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $-1.99 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $12.13M $2.32B $301.51K
Total debt – $3.00B –
Shares (diluted) 5.53B 52.10M 819.51M
Enterprise value -$44.98M -$11.04B $16.89M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHYSRJKSNEWH
P/E -16.9x -5.3x -6.3x
P/FCF -22.7x – -9.7x
P/Operating cash flow -22.7x – -9.7x
P/S 91,987x 0.1x –
P/B 3.6x 0.1x -7.6x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 0.2x -7.5x
EV/EBITDA -11.0x – -6.3x
EV/EBIT -11.0x -1.6x -6.3x
EV/Revenue 66,339x 0.2x –
EV/FCF -16.4x – -9.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -16.4x – -9.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.17 0.18 -0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHYSRJKSNEWH
Revenue growth (1Y) – -14.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -20.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 63.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -43.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -29.3% 114.8% -89.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.7% -44.0% 12.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 20.6% 4.5% -89.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -105.7% -46.4% 12.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 23.7% 85.8% -66.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -98.1% -29.5% 16.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -38.9% – -41.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.9% – -23.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -38.9% – -41.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.6% – -23.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHYSRJKSNEWH
Gross margin – 5.9% –
EBITDA margin -600,651% – –
Operating margin -601,652% 1.9% –
Pretax margin -502,370% 1.3% –
Net margin -522,522% -1.3% –
FCF margin -405,229% – –
Operating cash flow margin -405,229% – –
Return on equity -19.4% -30.8% –
Return on assets -18.8% -6.6% -657.0%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% –
Return on capital employed -23.1% -8.4% -945.4%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x – 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 93,359% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHYSRJKSNEWH
Debt / assets – 17.4% –
Debt / equity – 0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 3.6% 78.4% 976.5%
Equity / assets 96.4% 21.6% -876.5%
Interest coverage – -3.6x –
Current ratio 37.9x 1.1x 2.0x
Quick ratio 37.6x 0.5x 1.7x
Cash ratio 37.2x 0.3x 1.7x
Altman Z-score 54.19 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHYSRJKSNEWH
Dividend yield – 14.1% –
Net buyback yield -0.1% – -3.2%
Shareholder yield -0.1% 14.1% -3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHYSRJKSNEWH
EPS, next fiscal year – $-5.57FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $9.09BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – -2.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +29.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHYSRJKSNEWH
Held by institutions – 32.8% –
Institutions holding – 111 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +8.7% –
Institutions buying – 61 –
Institutions selling – 30 –
Buyers to sellers – 2.03 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HYSRJKSNEWH
HYSR 1.00 0.18 -0.03
JKS 0.18 1.00 0.07
NEWH -0.03 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HYSR, JKS and NEWH?

JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sunhydrogen (HYSR) $89.64M, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) $537.70M, NewHydrogen (NEWH) $20.08M.

Which company is more profitable?

JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) has the highest net margin (Sunhydrogen (HYSR) -522,521.9%, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) -1.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NewHydrogen (NEWH) returned the most: Sunhydrogen (HYSR) -33.3%, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) -57.2%, NewHydrogen (NEWH) 0.0%. Over five years, NewHydrogen (NEWH) compounded fastest (Sunhydrogen (HYSR) -22.2%/yr, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) -28.3%/yr, NewHydrogen (NEWH) +8.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) has been the steadiest (Sunhydrogen (HYSR) 141.6%, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) 61.2%, NewHydrogen (NEWH) 272.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HYSR, JKS and NEWH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.