HUM vs MCK vs FMS Stock Comparison

Humana, Mckesson and Fresenius Medical Care AG Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HUM Humana Inc
$417.04 +4.7% 1M +43.5% 1Y
Market cap
$50.08B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$145.68B
Div. yield
0.64%
Managed Care Healthcare
3 wins
MCK Mckesson Corp
$992.64 +14.5% 1M +23.8% 1Y
Market cap
$115.73B
P/E
25.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$410.98B
Div. yield
0.34%
Drug Distribution Healthcare
5 wins
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG
$22.76 +0.4% 1M -16.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.71B
P/E
12.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.07B
Div. yield
3.78%
Healthcare Services Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Mckesson leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Mckesson 5, Fresenius Medical Care AG 4, Humana 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHUMMCKFMSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $50.08B $115.73B $12.71B MCK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.1x 25.7x 12.1x FMS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 48.2x 21.1x 9.6x FMS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.3% +8.8% -47.8% HUM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.9% 1.1% 9.9% FMS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.7% 107.9% 0.2% MCK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 0.6x 200.7x HUM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.64% 0.34% 3.78% FMS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +43.5% +23.8% -16.4% HUM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.9%/yr +37.4%/yr -8.0%/yr MCK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.1% 30.7% 31.1% MCK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 71/100 54/100 MCK

Percentile Scorecard

HUMMCKFMS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHUMMCKFMS
Valuation 88 #2 of 9 100 #1 of 9 82 #6 of 28
Growth 13 #8 of 9 75 #3 of 9 9 #22 of 24
Profitability 63 #4 of 9 75 #3 of 9 71 #7 of 22
Financial Health 67 #4 of 10 33 #7 of 10 29 #25 of 35
Shareholder Returns – – 80 #3 of 11
Overall 57 71 54
  • HUM ranked among 10 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors
  • MCK ranked among 10 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors
  • FMS ranked among 36 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHUMMCKFMSSPY
1 month +4.7%+14.5%+0.4% -0.8%
3 months +9.4%+16.7%-8.5% +3.5%
6 months +86.5%+19.8%+0.6% +7.0%
Year to date +62.8%+21.0%-4.5% +12.2%
1 year +43.5%+23.8%-16.4% +13.0%
3 years -18.3%+121.6%+38.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year -6.5%+30.4%+11.6% +23.1%
5 years -9.1%+388.9%-33.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.9%+37.4%-8.0% +11.0%
10 years +138.8%+526.0%-43.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.1%+20.1%-5.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureHUMMCKFMSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.1%30.7%31.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.9%27.3%37.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.58-0.260.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.900.78-0.53 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.9%-27.2%-63.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.8%-3.6%-16.3% -1.8%
52-week high $433.45$1,030.18$27.20 $779.14
52-week low $163.67$725.17$20.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHUMMCKFMS
P/E now vs peer median 39.1xmedian 25.7x 25.7xmedian 25.7x 12.1xmedian 17.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.6x 0.3xmedian 0.6x 1.1xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 11.7x 16.6xmedian 11.7x 205.4xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 20.8x 18.0xmedian 20.8x 6.1xmedian 24.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 1.6x -27.3xmedian 1.6x 0.8xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median -1.46median 1.31 2.15median 1.31 0.58median 0.58

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHUMMCKFMS
Revenue $145.68B $410.98B $11.07B
Gross profit $19.89B $14.96B -$5.62B
Operating income $2.71B $6.50B $879.32M
Net income $1.29B $5.30B $1.38B
Free cash flow $1.95B $6.42B $2.08B
R&D – – $180.01M
EPS (diluted) $10.56 $38.52 $1.79
Cash & equivalents $6.89B $5.16B $1.21B
Total debt $54.48B $9.73B $572.99B
Shares (diluted) 121.14M 119.20M 612.52M
Enterprise value -$37.72B $102.19B $5.78B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHUMMCKFMS
P/E 39.1x 25.7x 12.1x
P/FCF 25.7x 18.0x 6.1x
P/Operating cash flow 19.7x 16.9x 3.9x
P/S 0.3x 0.3x 1.1x
P/B 2.6x -27.3x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 2.6x -14.0x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA 11.7x 16.6x 205.4x
EV/EBIT 15.1x 18.5x 628.4x
EV/Revenue 0.3x 0.3x 49.9x
EV/FCF 20.9x 18.8x 265.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.1x 17.6x 167.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.46 2.15 0.58

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHUMMCKFMS
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.3% 8.8% -47.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.8% 13.1% -18.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.5% 11.2% -207.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 6.6% -45.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -17.9% 46.6% -45.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.3% 13.5% -16.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.3% 58.1% 49.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -27.4% 10.7% 18.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -19.1% 52.8% 52.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -26.9% 12.0% 20.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.4% 4.7% 9.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -42.3% 10.7% 9.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -20.1% 6.8% -7.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -45.6% 11.3% 4.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHUMMCKFMS
Gross margin 13.7% 3.6% -50.7%
EBITDA margin 2.4% 1.8% 24.3%
Operating margin 1.9% 1.6% 7.9%
Pretax margin 1.1% 1.6% 15.8%
Net margin 0.9% 1.1% 9.9%
FCF margin 1.3% 1.6% 18.8%
Operating cash flow margin 1.7% 1.7% 29.8%
Return on equity 6.8% – 2.7%
Return on assets 2.3% 6.2% 1.2%
Return on invested capital 6.7% 107.9% 0.2%
Return on capital employed 8.1% 43.4% 3.2%
Asset turnover 2.6x 4.8x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 1.3x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHUMMCKFMS
Debt / assets 25.5% 11.0% 1,515%
Debt / equity 0.8x -2.3x 35.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 0.6x 200.7x
Debt / FCF 7.5x 1.5x 260.4x
Liabilities / assets 66.3% 104.8% 56.8%
Equity / assets 33.7% -4.8% 43.2%
Interest coverage 3.8x 23.6x 2.0x
Current ratio 1.7x 0.9x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.61 5.90 1.33

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHUMMCKFMS
Dividend yield 0.6% 0.3% 3.8%
Net buyback yield 0.3% 5.7% 8.5%
Shareholder yield 0.9% 6.1% 12.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 7.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 6.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 11.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHUMMCKFMS
Forward P/E 48.2xFY2026 21.1xFY2026 9.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 $47.14FY2026 $2.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -49.5%FY2026 +20.5%FY2026 -6.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +84.9% +11.1% +7.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $166.66BFY2026 $444.51BFY2026 $21.50BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.5%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.7% +1.4% -0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHUMMCKFMS
Held by institutions 98.6% 89.1% 7.3%
Institutions holding 927 2,007 235
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.7% -0.7% -2.9%
Institutions buying 558 879 151
Institutions selling 266 791 41
Buyers to sellers 2.10 1.11 3.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HUMMCKFMS
HUM 1.00 -0.02 0.14
MCK -0.02 1.00 0.12
FMS 0.14 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HUM, MCK and FMS?

Mckesson (MCK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Humana (HUM) $50.08B, Mckesson (MCK) $115.73B, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) $12.71B.

Which stock is cheaper, HUM, MCK and FMS?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Humana (HUM) 39.1x, Mckesson (MCK) 25.7x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 12.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) is cheapest (Humana (HUM) 48.2x, Mckesson (MCK) 21.1x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Humana (HUM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Humana (HUM) +18.3%, Mckesson (MCK) +8.8%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -47.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest net margin (Humana (HUM) 0.9%, Mckesson (MCK) 1.1%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.9%). On return on invested capital, Mckesson (MCK) leads (Humana (HUM) 6.7%, Mckesson (MCK) 107.9%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 0.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Humana (HUM) returned the most: Humana (HUM) +43.5%, Mckesson (MCK) +23.8%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -16.4%. Over five years, Mckesson (MCK) compounded fastest (Humana (HUM) -1.9%/yr, Mckesson (MCK) +37.4%/yr, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -8.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest dividend yield: Humana (HUM) 0.64%, Mckesson (MCK) 0.34%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 3.78%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mckesson (MCK) has been the steadiest (Humana (HUM) 48.1%, Mckesson (MCK) 30.7%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 31.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HUM, MCK and FMS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mckesson (MCK) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.