HUHU vs IR vs GGG Stock Comparison

HUHUTECH International, Ingersoll Rand and Graco Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IR Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$84.20 +7.2% 1M +9.0% 1Y
Market cap
$32.33B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.05B
Div. yield
0.10%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins
GGG Graco Inc
$69.80 -11.5% 1M -14.5% 1Y
Market cap
$11.19B
P/E
21.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.31B
Div. yield
1.67%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Graco leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Graco 8, Ingersoll Rand 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHUHUIRGGGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.16M $32.33B $11.19B IR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 23.7x 21.7x GGG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 25.1x 20.8x GGG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +8.0% +5.4% IR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 17.2% 22.4% GGG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.5% 19.5% GGG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.4x 0.0x GGG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.10% 1.67% GGG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -94.9% +9.0% -14.5% IR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +8.0%/yr -2.2%/yr IR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 125.2% 33.5% 26.6% GGG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 68/100 72/100 GGG

Percentile Scorecard

HUHUIRGGG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHUHUIRGGG
Valuation – 53 #97 of 204 49 #105 of 204
Growth – 84 #31 of 191 36 #123 of 191
Profitability – 84 #31 of 189 98 #5 of 189
Financial Health 31 #153 of 221 57 #95 of 221 86 #33 of 221
Shareholder Returns – 60 #65 of 159 92 #14 of 159
Overall – 68 72
  • HUHU ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • IR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • GGG ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHUHUIRGGGSPY
1 month -91.4%+7.2%-11.5% -1.0%
3 months -93.1%-6.4%-15.4% -0.4%
6 months -96.3%+7.1%-13.1% +4.5%
Year to date -96.2%+6.3%-14.8% +12.4%
1 year -94.9%+9.0%-14.5% +13.6%
3 years —+28.8%-9.4% +76.4%
3 years, per year —+8.8%-3.2% +20.8%
5 years —+47.1%-10.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year —+8.0%-2.2% +10.4%
10 years ——+178.8% +267.7%
10 years, per year ——+10.8% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureHUHUIRGGGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 125.2%33.5%26.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 142.9%31.3%31.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.381.190.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.760.27-0.55 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.8%-36.6%-30.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -96.8%-14.7%-26.4% -1.6%
52-week high $11.70$98.76$94.82 $779.14
52-week low $0.38$68.54$66.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHUHUIRGGG
P/E now vs peer median —median 25.5x 23.7xmedian 25.5x 21.7xmedian 25.5x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.9x 4.0xmedian 1.9x 4.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.4x 14.9xmedian 14.4x 15.4xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 23.3x 21.3xmedian 23.3x 18.7xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.2x 3.1xmedian 2.2x 4.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.16 1.01median 1.16 13.47median 1.16

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHUHUIRGGG
Revenue – $8.05B $2.31B
Gross profit – $3.47B $1.20B
Operating income – $1.84B $619.56M
Net income – $1.39B $517.48M
Free cash flow – $1.52B $600.10M
R&D – – $82.33M
EPS (diluted) – $3.53 $3.17
Cash & equivalents $3.58M $1.34B $139.82M
Total debt $4.50M $4.74B $134.46M
Shares (diluted) 23.23M 391.90M 163.02M
Enterprise value -$5.20M $27.36B $9.21B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHUHUIRGGG
P/E – 23.7x 21.7x
P/FCF – 21.3x 18.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 19.7x 17.0x
P/S – 4.0x 4.8x
P/B 1.2x 3.1x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 4.9x 5.5x
EV/EBITDA – 14.9x 15.4x
EV/EBIT – 19.4x 18.1x
EV/Revenue – 4.4x 4.8x
EV/FCF – 23.6x 18.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 21.8x 17.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.01 13.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHUHUIRGGG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 8.0% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% 1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 6.4% 4.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 8.0% 1.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 62.6% 3.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 18.6% -0.5%
Net income growth (1Y) – 152.7% 3.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 21.7% -0.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 158.7% 7.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 23.5% 1.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 18.8% -1.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.6% 3.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 21.4% -4.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 13.4% 14.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHUHUIRGGG
Gross margin – 43.1% 52.0%
EBITDA margin – 29.7% 31.6%
Operating margin – 22.9% 26.8%
Pretax margin – 20.1% 27.6%
Net margin – 17.2% 22.4%
FCF margin – 18.8% 26.0%
Operating cash flow margin – 20.4% 28.6%
Return on equity – 13.4% 20.7%
Return on assets – 7.6% 16.2%
Return on invested capital – 10.5% 19.5%
Return on capital employed – 11.8% 23.2%
Asset turnover – 0.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% 1.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHUHUIRGGG
Debt / assets 20.1% 25.4% 4.1%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.4x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.4x 0.0x
Debt / FCF – 3.1x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 66.6% 43.2% 24.3%
Equity / assets 33.4% 56.8% 75.7%
Interest coverage – 7.2x 189.0x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.7x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.0x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.5x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 3.61 10.57

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHUHUIRGGG
Dividend yield – 0.1% 1.7%
Net buyback yield – 3.0% 4.2%
Shareholder yield – 3.1% 5.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 2.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 2.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -3.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHUHUIRGGG
Forward P/E – 25.1xFY2026 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.35FY2026 $3.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +0.3%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +21.5% +7.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $8.35BFY2026 $2.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +9.2%FY2026 -1.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +6.4% +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHUHUIRGGG
Held by institutions – 100.0% 91.0%
Institutions holding – 896 732
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.5% +0.8%
Institutions buying – 369 337
Institutions selling – 360 281
Buyers to sellers – 1.03 1.20

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HUHUIRGGG
HUHU 1.00 -0.03 0.10
IR -0.03 1.00 0.65
GGG 0.10 0.65 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HUHU, IR and GGG?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) is the largest by market capitalisation: HUHUTECH International (HUHU) $9.16M, Ingersoll Rand (IR) $32.33B, Graco (GGG) $11.19B.

Which stock is cheaper, HUHU, IR and GGG?

Graco (GGG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ingersoll Rand (IR) 23.7x, Graco (GGG) 21.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Graco (GGG) is cheapest (Ingersoll Rand (IR) 25.1x, Graco (GGG) 20.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ingersoll Rand (IR) +8.0%, Graco (GGG) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Graco (GGG) has the highest net margin (Ingersoll Rand (IR) 17.2%, Graco (GGG) 22.4%). On return on invested capital, Graco (GGG) leads (Ingersoll Rand (IR) 10.5%, Graco (GGG) 19.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ingersoll Rand (IR) returned the most: HUHUTECH International (HUHU) -94.9%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +9.0%, Graco (GGG) -14.5%. Over five years, Ingersoll Rand (IR) compounded fastest (Ingersoll Rand (IR) +8.0%/yr, Graco (GGG) -2.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Graco (GGG) has the highest dividend yield: Ingersoll Rand (IR) 0.10%, Graco (GGG) 1.67%. HUHUTECH International (HUHU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Graco (GGG) has been the steadiest (HUHUTECH International (HUHU) 125.2%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 33.5%, Graco (GGG) 26.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HUHU, IR and GGG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Graco (GGG) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.