HUCK vs MSTR vs CGNT Stock Comparison

Huckleberry.ai, Strategy and Cognyte Software Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HUCK Huckleberry.ai, Inc.
$3.11 -7.7% 1M -77.2% 1Y
Market cap
$136.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$315.21M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
MSTR Strategy Inc
$139.82 -11.8% 1M -51.6% 1Y
Market cap
$49.21B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$498.35M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
3 wins
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd.
$9.97 +17.0% 1M +19.0% 1Y
Market cap
$728.59M
P/E
208.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$421.71M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Cognyte Software leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cognyte Software 6, Strategy 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHUCKMSTRCGNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $136.13M $49.21B $728.59M MSTR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.4x -1.6x 208.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 44.4x — 20.8x CGNT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.0% +7.8% +12.0% CGNT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -13.4% -6,294.3% 0.8% CGNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -73.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 67.5x -0.1x — MSTR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -77.2% -51.6% +19.0% CGNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -48.7%/yr +14.4%/yr -13.7%/yr MSTR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 101.1% 81.3% 52.2% CGNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 21/100 57/100 CGNT

Percentile Scorecard

HUCKMSTRCGNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHUCKMSTRCGNT
Valuation 37 #65 of 102 9 #93 of 102 57 #44 of 102
Growth 36 #63 of 98 7 #91 of 98 89 #12 of 98
Profitability 37 #60 of 95 9 #87 of 95 64 #35 of 95
Financial Health 6 #103 of 109 80 #23 of 109 60 #44 of 109
Shareholder Returns 18 #53 of 64 3 #62 of 64 14 #55 of 64
Overall 27 21 57
  • HUCK ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • MSTR ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • CGNT ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHUCKMSTRCGNTSPY
1 month -7.7%-11.8%+17.0% -0.8%
3 months -12.9%+41.7%+14.5% +3.5%
6 months -12.6%-17.4%+5.6% +7.0%
Year to date -63.1%-8.0%+6.1% +12.2%
1 year -77.2%-51.6%+19.0% +13.0%
3 years -61.2%+243.7%+148.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -27.1%+51.0%+35.4% +23.1%
5 years -96.5%+95.6%-52.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year -48.7%+14.4%-13.7% +11.0%
10 years —+713.9%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+23.3%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureHUCKMSTRCGNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 101.1%81.3%52.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 107.6%74.6%56.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.183.141.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.76-0.640.36 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.8%-84.1%-89.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.8%-52.7%-18.5% -1.8%
52-week high $14.01$295.63$12.24 $779.14
52-week low $2.00$82.31$6.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHUCKMSTRCGNT
P/E now vs peer median -3.4xmedian 28.8x -1.6xmedian 28.8x 208.3xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.8x 98.7xmedian 2.8x 1.7xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 149.4xmedian 17.7x -1.5xmedian 17.7x 21.3xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -15.5xmedian 15.8x -1,879xmedian 15.8x 25.2xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 3.2x 1.6xmedian 3.2x 3.3xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.13median 0.85 0.00median 0.85 7.73median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHUCKMSTRCGNT
Revenue $315.21M $498.35M $421.71M
Gross profit $237.80M $336.89M $307.70M
Operating income -$30.85M -$36.36B $17.43M
Net income -$42.15M -$30.41B $4.85M
Free cash flow -$8.79M -$26.19M $28.96M
R&D $74.68M $93.13M $127.59M
EPS (diluted) $-0.92 $-88.98 $0.05
Cash & equivalents $25.10M $1.71B $102.17M
Total debt – $6.71B –
Shares (diluted) 46.00M 352.53M 72.91M
Enterprise value -$18.89M $42.20B $317.93M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHUCKMSTRCGNT
P/E -3.4x -1.6x 208.3x
P/FCF -15.5x -1,879x 25.2x
P/Operating cash flow -228.0x -2,450x 17.6x
P/S 0.4x 98.7x 1.7x
P/B -0.7x 1.6x 3.3x
P/Tangible book -0.7x -2.6x 3.4x
EV/EBITDA 149.4x -1.5x 21.3x
EV/EBIT -8.0x -1.5x 35.9x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 107.3x 1.5x
EV/FCF -28.2x -2,042x 21.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -415.9x -2,662x 15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.13 0.00 7.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHUCKMSTRCGNT
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.0% 7.8% 12.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.3% -0.1% 12.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.1% 4.0% 15.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.7% -5.0% 17.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.3% -645.8% 406.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.0% -437.1% 31.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.6% -734.6% 202.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.5% -430.3% 27.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.9% -676.7% 201.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.9% -314.6% 26.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -123.5% 79.0% 56.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 57.6% -202.3% 38.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -17.9% 74.1% 53.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.6% -109.9% 66.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHUCKMSTRCGNT
Gross margin 75.4% 67.6% 73.0%
EBITDA margin 0.5% -7,284% 7.0%
Operating margin -9.8% -7,295% 4.1%
Pretax margin -12.8% -7,280% 3.1%
Net margin -13.4% -6,294% 0.8%
FCF margin -2.8% -5.3% 6.9%
Operating cash flow margin -0.2% -4.0% 9.8%
Return on equity – -90.1% 2.2%
Return on assets -22.7% -56.9% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – -73.9% –
Return on capital employed – -68.7% 5.9%
Asset turnover 1.7x 0.0x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 0.0x 8.5x
Stock comp / revenue 16.2% 10.7% 5.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHUCKMSTRCGNT
Debt / assets 78.4% 12.8% –
Debt / equity -0.7x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 67.5x -0.1x –
Debt / FCF -15.6x -256.2x –
Liabilities / assets 207.1% 41.2% 56.6%
Equity / assets -107.1% 58.8% 43.4%
Interest coverage – – 113.9x
Current ratio 0.3x 5.4x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.2x 5.2x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 4.9x 0.5x
Altman Z-score -12.86 -1.27 2.22

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHUCKMSTRCGNT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.7% -53.9% -2.8%
Shareholder yield -0.7% -53.9% -2.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHUCKMSTRCGNT
Forward P/E 44.4xFY2026 – 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.07FY2026 $-20.46FY2026 $0.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +71.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -28.6% – +68.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $301.44MFY2026 $466.60MFY2026 $426.78MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.5%FY2026 -2.2%FY2026 +6.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.9% +14.0% +18.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHUCKMSTRCGNT
Held by institutions – 57.9% 67.2%
Institutions holding – 867 133
Change in shares held, QoQ – +12.5% -2.8%
Institutions buying – 501 75
Institutions selling – 256 33
Buyers to sellers – 1.96 2.27

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HUCKMSTRCGNT
HUCK 1.00 0.22 0.37
MSTR 0.22 1.00 0.34
CGNT 0.37 0.34 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HUCK, MSTR and CGNT?

Strategy (MSTR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) $136.13M, Strategy (MSTR) $49.21B, Cognyte Software (CGNT) $728.59M.

Which company is growing faster?

Cognyte Software (CGNT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -1.0%, Strategy (MSTR) +7.8%, Cognyte Software (CGNT) +12.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cognyte Software (CGNT) has the highest net margin (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -13.4%, Strategy (MSTR) -6,294.3%, Cognyte Software (CGNT) 0.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cognyte Software (CGNT) returned the most: Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -77.2%, Strategy (MSTR) -51.6%, Cognyte Software (CGNT) +19.0%. Over five years, Strategy (MSTR) compounded fastest (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -48.7%/yr, Strategy (MSTR) +14.4%/yr, Cognyte Software (CGNT) -13.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cognyte Software (CGNT) has been the steadiest (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 101.1%, Strategy (MSTR) 81.3%, Cognyte Software (CGNT) 52.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HUCK, MSTR and CGNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cognyte Software (CGNT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.