HUCK vs CRM vs NEXN Stock Comparison

Huckleberry.ai, Salesforce and Nexxen International Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HUCK Huckleberry.ai, Inc.
$3.11 -7.7% 1M -77.2% 1Y
Market cap
$142.14M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$315.21M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
CRM Salesforce, Inc.
$247.58 +5.8% 1M -2.8% 1Y
Market cap
$198.96B
P/E
20.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$43.94B
Div. yield
–
CRM and Sales Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Nexxen International leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Nexxen International 6, Salesforce 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHUCKCRMNEXNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $142.14M $198.96B $512.29M CRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.4x 20.6x 0.1x NEXN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 44.4x 14.0x 8.7x NEXN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.0% +11.2% +3.0% CRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -13.4% 22.0% 950.3% NEXN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 9.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 67.5x 1.9x — CRM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -77.2% -2.8% +0.9% NEXN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -48.7%/yr -3.5%/yr -14.7%/yr CRM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 101.1% 46.8% 45.0% NEXN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 70/100 73/100 NEXN

Percentile Scorecard

HUCKCRMNEXN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHUCKCRMNEXN
Valuation 37 #65 of 102 76 #25 of 102 91 #16 of 167
Growth 36 #63 of 98 73 #27 of 98 36 #99 of 153
Profitability 37 #60 of 95 88 #12 of 95 80 #32 of 153
Financial Health 6 #103 of 109 43 #63 of 109 58 #75 of 179
Shareholder Returns 18 #53 of 64 70 #20 of 64 100 #1 of 94
Overall 27 70 73
  • HUCK ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • CRM ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • NEXN ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHUCKCRMNEXNSPY
1 month -7.7%+5.8%-0.5% -0.8%
3 months -12.9%+42.7%-15.5% +3.5%
6 months -12.6%+37.4%+19.8% +7.0%
Year to date -63.1%-6.5%+32.4% +12.2%
1 year -77.2%-2.8%+0.9% +13.0%
3 years -61.2%+26.0%+168.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year -27.1%+8.0%+39.1% +23.1%
5 years -96.5%-16.1%-54.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -48.7%-3.5%-14.7% +11.0%
10 years —+230.3%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+12.7%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureHUCKCRMNEXNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 101.1%46.8%45.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 107.6%41.6%51.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.180.400.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.76-0.060.02 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.8%-59.2%-84.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.8%-7.0%-20.9% -1.8%
52-week high $14.01$266.23$10.95 $779.14
52-week low $2.00$150.12$5.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHUCKCRMNEXN
P/E now vs peer median -3.4xmedian 28.8x 21.0xmedian 28.8x 0.1xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.8x 4.6xmedian 2.8x 1.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 149.4xmedian 17.7x 15.5xmedian 17.7x 3.6xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -15.5xmedian 15.8x 13.4xmedian 15.8x 4.2xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 3.2x 5.3xmedian 3.2x 1.0xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.13median 0.85 0.22median 0.85 0.00median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHUCKCRMNEXN
Revenue $315.21M $43.94B $382.86M
Gross profit $237.80M $33.96B $315.91M
Operating income -$30.85M $8.74B $19.59M
Net income -$42.15M $9.66B $13.07M
Free cash flow -$8.79M $15.15B $115.13M
R&D $74.68M $6.37B $60.09M
EPS (diluted) $-0.92 $11.77 $59.59
Cash & equivalents $25.10M $8.31B $132.04M
Total debt – $39.29B –
Shares (diluted) 46.00M 821.00M 61.06M
Enterprise value -$12.89M $154.84B -$144.36M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHUCKCRMNEXN
P/E -3.4x 21.0x 0.1x
P/FCF -15.5x 13.4x 4.2x
P/Operating cash flow -228.0x 12.9x 4.3x
P/S 0.4x 4.6x 1.3x
P/B -0.7x 5.3x 1.0x
P/Tangible book -0.7x 6.3x 2.9x
EV/EBITDA 149.4x 15.5x 3.6x
EV/EBIT -8.0x 26.5x 15.8x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 5.3x 0.8x
EV/FCF -28.2x 15.3x 2.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -415.9x 14.7x 2.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.13 0.22 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHUCKCRMNEXN
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.0% 11.2% 3.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.3% 9.9% 4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.1% 10.7% -0.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.7% 11.3% 5.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.3% 9.4% -63.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.0% 47.8% -4.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.6% 45.0% -73.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.5% 82.9% 38.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.9% 69.9% -51.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.9% 94.5% 38.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -123.5% 19.6% -11.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 57.6% 23.3% 41.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -17.9% 21.3% -6.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.6% 26.1% 48.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHUCKCRMNEXN
Gross margin 75.4% 77.3% 82.5%
EBITDA margin 0.5% 34.0% 22.5%
Operating margin -9.8% 19.9% 5.1%
Pretax margin -12.8% 28.2% 2.2%
Net margin -13.4% 22.0% 950.3%
FCF margin -2.8% 34.5% 30.1%
Operating cash flow margin -0.2% 35.8% 29.7%
Return on equity – 26.7% 2.8%
Return on assets -22.7% 8.9% 1.7%
Return on invested capital – 9.0% –
Return on capital employed – 10.7% 4.1%
Asset turnover 1.7x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 1.6x 8.7x
Stock comp / revenue 16.2% 8.3% 4.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHUCKCRMNEXN
Debt / assets 78.4% 35.8% –
Debt / equity -0.7x 1.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 67.5x 1.9x –
Debt / FCF -15.6x 2.6x –
Liabilities / assets 207.1% 65.0% 39.5%
Equity / assets -107.1% 35.0% 60.5%
Interest coverage – 9.4x 8.5x
Current ratio 0.3x 0.8x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.7x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.4x 0.6x
Altman Z-score -12.86 2.68 1.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHUCKCRMNEXN
Dividend yield – 0.7% –
Net buyback yield -0.7% 16.8% 34.2%
Shareholder yield -0.7% 17.5% 34.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHUCKCRMNEXN
Forward P/E 44.4xFY2026 14.0xFY2026 8.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.07FY2026 $17.65FY2026 $1.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +41.0%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -28.6% -5.3% +27.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $301.44MFY2026 $43.89BFY2026 $373.87MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.5%FY2026 +5.7%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.9% +11.7% +8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHUCKCRMNEXN
Held by institutions – 80.7% 62.6%
Institutions holding – 2,471 126
Change in shares held, QoQ – -4.8% +7.7%
Institutions buying – 1,003 79
Institutions selling – 1,270 30
Buyers to sellers – 0.79 2.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HUCKCRMNEXN
HUCK 1.00 0.27 0.22
CRM 0.27 1.00 0.30
NEXN 0.22 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HUCK, CRM and NEXN?

Salesforce (CRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) $142.14M, Salesforce (CRM) $198.96B, Nexxen International (NEXN) $512.29M.

Which stock is cheaper, HUCK, CRM and NEXN?

Nexxen International (NEXN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -3.4x, Salesforce (CRM) 20.6x, Nexxen International (NEXN) 0.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nexxen International (NEXN) is cheapest (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 44.4x, Salesforce (CRM) 14.0x, Nexxen International (NEXN) 8.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Salesforce (CRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -1.0%, Salesforce (CRM) +11.2%, Nexxen International (NEXN) +3.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nexxen International (NEXN) has the highest net margin (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -13.4%, Salesforce (CRM) 22.0%, Nexxen International (NEXN) 950.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nexxen International (NEXN) returned the most: Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -77.2%, Salesforce (CRM) -2.8%, Nexxen International (NEXN) +0.9%. Over five years, Salesforce (CRM) compounded fastest (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -48.7%/yr, Salesforce (CRM) -3.5%/yr, Nexxen International (NEXN) -14.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nexxen International (NEXN) has been the steadiest (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 101.1%, Salesforce (CRM) 46.8%, Nexxen International (NEXN) 45.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HUCK, CRM and NEXN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nexxen International (NEXN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.