HTT vs SMFG vs OMF Stock Comparison

High Templar Tech, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial and OneMain Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.90 -20.8% 1M -57.2% 1Y
Market cap
$839.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc.
$56.36 -1.8% 1M -1.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.59B
P/E
8.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.08B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial 5, OneMain Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHTTSMFGOMFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $839.32M $93.04B $6.59B SMFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -2.1x 8.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.3x 8.8x OMF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +34.8% +7.8% SMFG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -42.5% 15.4% OMF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -0.9% 8.7% OMF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 6.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -57.2% +48.5% -1.3% SMFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.8%/yr +29.4%/yr +1.4%/yr SMFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.9% 29.2% 29.3% SMFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 23/100 56/100 OMF

Percentile Scorecard

HTTSMFGOMF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHTTSMFGOMF
Valuation – 47 #192 of 362 69 #53 of 170
Growth – 34 #147 of 221 55 #73 of 160
Profitability – 18 #165 of 200 96 #7 of 149
Financial Health 93 #12 of 158 4 #196 of 203 16 #133 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 11 #303 of 342 46 #73 of 135
Overall – 23 56
  • HTT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • SMFG ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • OMF ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHTTSMFGOMFSPY
1 month -20.8%-10.5%-1.8% -0.8%
3 months -21.5%-9.7%-8.0% +3.5%
6 months -21.8%+17.0%-4.4% +7.0%
Year to date -46.5%+23.1%-16.6% +12.2%
1 year -57.2%+48.5%-1.3% +13.0%
3 years +5.6%+147.7%+58.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +1.8%+35.3%+16.6% +23.1%
5 years +9.2%+262.3%+7.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +1.8%+29.4%+1.4% +11.0%
10 years —+252.1%+89.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+13.4%+6.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureHTTSMFGOMFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.9%29.2%29.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.8%28.2%30.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.151.101.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.011.66-0.04 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.4%-30.0%-46.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -61.6%-13.6%-21.0% -1.8%
52-week high $4.95$27.55$71.37 $779.14
52-week low $1.90$16.05$49.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHTTSMFGOMF
P/E now vs peer median —median 11.0x -2.1xmedian 12.1x 8.3xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.6x 0.9xmedian 3.4x 1.3xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x —median 5.0x 8.9xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 6.9x —median 11.0x 2.0xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 0.08median 1.36 1.02median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHTTSMFGOMF
Revenue – $103.68B $5.08B
Gross profit – $67.73B $4.89B
Operating income – -$30.78B $2.92B
Net income – $11.49B $781.00M
Free cash flow – – $3.23B
EPS (diluted) – $-11.47 $6.75
Cash & equivalents $561.74M – $567.00M
Total debt $879.65M $397.48B $22.77B
Shares (diluted) 500.73M 3.84B 115.76M
Enterprise value -$2.19B -$1.26T $3.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHTTSMFGOMF
P/E – -2.1x 8.3x
P/FCF – – 2.0x
P/Operating cash flow – – 2.0x
P/S – 0.9x 1.3x
P/B 0.5x 1.2x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 1.2x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA – – 8.9x
EV/EBIT – -35.6x 9.8x
EV/Revenue – 0.8x 5.6x
EV/FCF – – 8.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 8.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.08 1.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHTTSMFGOMF
Revenue growth (1Y) – 34.8% 7.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 14.6% 6.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 12.6% 8.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.3% 6.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -32.3% 9.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -75.2% 7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 823.3% 17.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 4.6% 6.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – 15.9% 21.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -25.7% 8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 12.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 9.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 12.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 9.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHTTSMFGOMF
Gross margin – 65.3% 96.2%
EBITDA margin – – 63.2%
Operating margin – -29.7% 57.4%
Pretax margin – 14.5% 19.8%
Net margin – -42.5% 15.4%
FCF margin – – 63.6%
Operating cash flow margin – – 63.6%
Return on equity – 13.3% 23.1%
Return on assets – 0.6% 2.9%
Return on invested capital – -0.9% 8.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 4.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHTTSMFGOMF
Debt / assets 16.0% 5.0% 83.0%
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.4x 6.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 6.9x
Debt / FCF – – 7.0x
Liabilities / assets 21.2% 96.4% 87.7%
Equity / assets 78.8% 3.6% 12.3%
Interest coverage – -0.1x –
Current ratio 4.8x – –
Quick ratio 2.4x – –
Cash ratio 2.4x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHTTSMFGOMF
Dividend yield – 1.2% 7.5%
Net buyback yield – – 3.7%
Shareholder yield – 1.2% 11.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHTTSMFGOMF
Forward P/E – 14.3xFY2026 8.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.04FY2024 $1.67FY2026 $6.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -233.3%FY2024 +28.5%FY2026 -4.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +2.4% +38.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $47.00MFY2024 $34.01BFY2026 $5.39BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +164.2%FY2024 -50.1%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +14.2% +12.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHTTSMFGOMF
Held by institutions 2.2% 3.5% 93.8%
Institutions holding 42 459 520
Change in shares held, QoQ -26.1% +7.9% +4.6%
Institutions buying 14 291 285
Institutions selling 21 91 172
Buyers to sellers 0.67 3.20 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HTTSMFGOMF
HTT 1.00 0.17 0.10
SMFG 0.17 1.00 0.20
OMF 0.10 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HTT, SMFG and OMF?

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: High Templar Tech (HTT) $839.32M, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) $93.04B, OneMain Holdings (OMF) $6.59B.

Which company is growing faster?

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +34.8%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) +7.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

OneMain Holdings (OMF) has the highest net margin (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) -42.5%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) 15.4%). On return on invested capital, OneMain Holdings (OMF) leads (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) -0.9%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) 8.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) returned the most: High Templar Tech (HTT) -57.2%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +48.5%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) -1.3%. Over five years, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) compounded fastest (High Templar Tech (HTT) +1.8%/yr, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +29.4%/yr, OneMain Holdings (OMF) +1.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) has been the steadiest (High Templar Tech (HTT) 56.9%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) 29.2%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) 29.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HTT, SMFG and OMF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.