HTFL vs PHG vs CBLL Stock Comparison

Heartflow, Koninklijke Philips and Ceribell Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HTFL Heartflow, Inc.
$57.01 +15.9% 1M +50.5% 1Y
Market cap
$5.00B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$202.91M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
1 win
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$26.56 +6.4% 1M -7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$25.07B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.60B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
4 wins
CBLL Ceribell, Inc.
$27.03 +14.1% 1M +109.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.03B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$101.96M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Koninklijke Philips leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Koninklijke Philips 4, Ceribell 2, Heartflow 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHTFLPHGCBLLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.00B $25.07B $1.03B PHG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -49.9x 13.6x -15.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +42.5% +6.1% +31.7% HTFL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -49.4% 8.9% -64.7% PHG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 11.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.8x 1.6x CBLL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +50.5% -7.9% +109.7% CBLL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -10.8%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 76.9% 28.8% 52.2% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 80/100 38/100 PHG

Percentile Scorecard

HTFLPHGCBLL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHTFLPHGCBLL
Valuation 8 #209 of 228 98 #6 of 228 21 #180 of 228
Growth 78 #50 of 221 96 #11 of 221 21 #175 of 221
Profitability 49 #107 of 208 96 #10 of 208 37 #132 of 208
Financial Health 91 #22 of 239 31 #166 of 239 81 #46 of 239
Shareholder Returns – 79 #29 of 137 29 #97 of 137
Overall 57 80 38
  • HTFL ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • PHG ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • CBLL ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHTFLPHGCBLLSPY
1 month +15.9%+6.4%+14.1% -0.8%
3 months +124.7%+6.2%+49.1% +3.5%
6 months +79.7%-3.6%+27.9% +7.0%
Year to date +95.6%-1.9%+23.3% +12.2%
1 year +50.5%-7.9%+109.7% +13.0%
3 years —+43.6%— +86.3%
3 years, per year —+12.8%— +23.1%
5 years —-43.6%— +68.6%
5 years, per year —-10.8%— +11.0%
10 years —-11.6%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-1.2%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureHTFLPHGCBLLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 76.9%28.8%52.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 77.5%28.8%49.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.900.811.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.66-0.272.10 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.7%-75.6%-63.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-19.3%-2.3% -1.8%
52-week high $57.01$32.91$27.68 $779.14
52-week low $20.49$23.81$10.92 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHTFLPHGCBLL
P/E now vs peer median -49.2xmedian 30.6x 13.7xmedian 30.6x -15.6xmedian 30.6x
P/S now vs peer median 24.4xmedian 3.0x 1.2xmedian 3.0x 10.1xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x 8.1xmedian 17.5x -13.5xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 23.3x 5.9xmedian 23.3x -18.9xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 17.7xmedian 2.4x 2.0xmedian 2.4x 8.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.87 0.32median 0.87 —median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHTFLPHGCBLL
Revenue $202.91M $20.60B $101.96M
Gross profit $160.45M $16.03B $90.65M
Operating income -$64.46M $2.65B -$69.97M
Net income -$100.19M $1.39B -$66.00M
Free cash flow – $4.34B -$54.72M
R&D $77.26M $2.00B $22.95M
EPS (diluted) $-1.16 $1.91 $-1.74
Cash & equivalents $34.36M $2.04B $32.66M
Total debt – $9.51B $19.98M
Shares (diluted) 86.40M 962.50M 38.03M
Enterprise value $4.75B $14.18B $436.22M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHTFLPHGCBLL
P/E -49.2x 13.7x -15.6x
P/FCF – 5.9x -18.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.6x -19.1x
P/S 24.4x 1.2x 10.1x
P/B 17.7x 2.0x 8.1x
P/Tangible book 17.7x 2.5x 8.1x
EV/EBITDA – 8.1x -13.5x
EV/EBIT -72.9x 12.4x -13.2x
EV/Revenue 23.1x 1.6x 9.1x
EV/FCF – 7.6x -16.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.4x -17.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.32 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHTFLPHGCBLL
Revenue growth (1Y) 42.5% 6.1% 31.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 48.8% 82.4% 33.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 6.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.5% 121.3% -34.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 52.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -18.3% 293.5% -33.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 35.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 91.4% 539.4% -27.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 42.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 116.7% -44.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 53.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 54.2% -41.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 45.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHTFLPHGCBLL
Gross margin 79.1% 77.8% 88.9%
EBITDA margin – 19.8% -67.1%
Operating margin -31.8% 12.9% -68.6%
Pretax margin -49.4% 11.9% -64.7%
Net margin -49.4% 8.9% -64.7%
FCF margin – 21.1% -53.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 12.9% -53.0%
Return on equity -34.5% 12.7% -49.0%
Return on assets -28.5% 5.4% -38.3%
Return on invested capital – 11.5% –
Return on capital employed -20.9% 11.8% -45.1%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 9.6% 0.7% 16.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHTFLPHGCBLL
Debt / assets – 31.2% 12.0%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.8x 1.6x
Debt / FCF – 2.2x -0.4x
Liabilities / assets 18.8% 57.1% 22.9%
Equity / assets 81.2% 42.9% 77.1%
Interest coverage – 6.2x -38.6x
Current ratio 5.1x 1.3x 9.2x
Quick ratio 6.6x 0.7x 8.6x
Cash ratio 5.6x 0.2x 7.5x
Altman Z-score 41.82 – 14.35

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHTFLPHGCBLL
Dividend yield – 3.7% –
Net buyback yield – -0.5% -0.6%
Shareholder yield – 3.3% -0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHTFLPHGCBLL
Forward P/E – 13.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.43FY2026 $1.98FY2026 $-1.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +6.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -10.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $261.38MFY2026 $21.63BFY2026 $118.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +48.5%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 +32.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.6% -8.2% +21.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHTFLPHGCBLL
Held by institutions 100.0% 5.4% 79.9%
Institutions holding 192 363 124
Change in shares held, QoQ +133.0% +0.8% +2.2%
Institutions buying 140 266 74
Institutions selling 38 76 36
Buyers to sellers 3.68 3.50 2.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HTFLPHGCBLL
HTFL 1.00 0.14 0.26
PHG 0.14 1.00 0.22
CBLL 0.26 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HTFL, PHG and CBLL?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Heartflow (HTFL) $5.00B, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $25.07B, Ceribell (CBLL) $1.03B.

Which company is growing faster?

Heartflow (HTFL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Heartflow (HTFL) +42.5%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +6.1%, Ceribell (CBLL) +31.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has the highest net margin (Heartflow (HTFL) -49.4%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 8.9%, Ceribell (CBLL) -64.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ceribell (CBLL) returned the most: Heartflow (HTFL) +50.5%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -7.9%, Ceribell (CBLL) +109.7%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (Heartflow (HTFL) 76.9%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.8%, Ceribell (CBLL) 52.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HTFL, PHG and CBLL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.