HTFL vs NEOG vs NNNN Stock Comparison

Heartflow, Neogen and Anbio Biotechnology Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HTFL Heartflow, Inc.
$57.82 +17.6% 1M +50.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.03B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$202.91M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
2 wins
NEOG Neogen Corp
$12.47 -9.4% 1M +100.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.66B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$883.99M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
4 wins
NNNN Anbio Biotechnology
$3.71 -41.1% 1M -84.5% 1Y
Market cap
$163.33M
P/E
25.3x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Neogen leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Neogen 4, Heartflow 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHTFLNEOGNNNNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.03B $2.66B $163.33M HTFL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -50.2x -47.3x 25.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 39.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +42.5% -0.3% — HTFL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -49.4% -6.3% — NEOG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -0.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 5.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +50.8% +100.8% -84.5% NEOG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -21.4%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 76.7% 55.6% 135.9% NEOG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 58/100 — NEOG

Percentile Scorecard

HTFLNEOGNNNN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHTFLNEOGNNNN
Valuation 9 #207 of 227 71 #66 of 227 20 #183 of 227
Growth 78 #49 of 219 50 #110 of 219 –
Profitability 49 #106 of 206 62 #79 of 206 –
Financial Health 92 #20 of 238 46 #128 of 238 100 #1 of 238
Shareholder Returns – 58 #57 of 134 –
Overall 57 58 –
  • HTFL ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • NEOG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • NNNN ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHTFLNEOGNNNNSPY
1 month +17.6%-9.4%-41.1% -0.2%
3 months +125.9%+35.7%-63.4% +3.9%
6 months +89.3%+33.5%-86.7% +8.2%
Year to date +98.4%+78.4%-87.7% +12.9%
1 year +50.8%+100.8%-84.5% +12.3%
3 years —-18.6%— +87.4%
3 years, per year —-6.6%— +23.3%
5 years —-69.9%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —-21.4%— +10.9%
10 years —-35.8%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-4.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureHTFLNEOGNNNNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 76.7%55.6%135.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 77.5%46.5%136.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.901.450.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.661.81-0.62 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.7%-90.6%-94.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-10.8%-91.0% -1.2%
52-week high $57.82$13.98$41.11 $779.14
52-week low $20.49$5.41$3.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHTFLNEOGNNNN
P/E now vs peer median -49.9xmedian 29.6x -48.5xmedian 29.6x 25.3xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 24.7xmedian 2.9x 3.1xmedian 2.9x 61.7xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.4x 30.0xmedian 17.4x —median 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 22.3x 54.7xmedian 22.3x -79.2xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 2.3x 1.3xmedian 2.3x 17.7xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.04 1.73median 1.04 —median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHTFLNEOGNNNN
Revenue $202.91M $883.99M –
Gross profit $160.45M $418.98M –
Operating income -$64.46M -$7.38M –
Net income -$100.19M -$56.10M –
Free cash flow – $49.80M –
R&D $77.26M $19.76M –
EPS (diluted) $-1.16 $-0.26 –
Cash & equivalents $34.36M $172.00M $7.77M
Total debt – $774.20M –
Shares (diluted) 86.40M 218.10M 43.67M
Enterprise value $4.78B $1.99B $116.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHTFLNEOGNNNN
P/E -49.9x -48.5x 25.3x
P/FCF – 54.7x -79.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 31.9x –
P/S 24.7x 3.1x 61.7x
P/B 17.9x 1.3x 17.7x
P/Tangible book 17.9x 3.4x 17.7x
EV/EBITDA – 30.0x –
EV/EBIT -74.0x -450.7x –
EV/Revenue 23.5x 3.8x –
EV/FCF – 66.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 39.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.73 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHTFLNEOGNNNN
Revenue growth (1Y) 42.5% -0.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -1.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 48.8% 1.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -3.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.5% 99.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -29.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -18.3% 94.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -28.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 91.4% 94.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -28.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 1,631% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 126.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHTFLNEOGNNNN
Gross margin 79.1% 47.4% –
EBITDA margin – 12.5% –
Operating margin -31.8% -0.8% –
Pretax margin -49.4% -7.7% –
Net margin -49.4% -6.3% –
FCF margin – 5.6% –
Operating cash flow margin – 9.6% –
Return on equity -34.5% -2.7% –
Return on assets -28.5% -1.7% –
Return on invested capital – -0.2% –
Return on capital employed -20.9% -0.2% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -1.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 9.6% 1.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHTFLNEOGNNNN
Debt / assets – 23.4% –
Debt / equity – 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 5.4x –
Debt / FCF – 15.5x –
Liabilities / assets 18.8% 36.8% 0.3%
Equity / assets 81.2% 63.2% 99.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 5.1x 3.9x 344.3x
Quick ratio 6.6x 2.1x 177.1x
Cash ratio 5.6x 1.2x 135.5x
Altman Z-score 42.47 1.52 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHTFLNEOGNNNN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -0.1% –
Shareholder yield – -0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHTFLNEOGNNNN
Forward P/E – 39.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.43FY2026 $0.32FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – 0.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +31.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $261.38MFY2026 $847.28MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +48.5%FY2026 -2.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +20.6% -1.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHTFLNEOGNNNN
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Institutions holding 192 315 12
Change in shares held, QoQ +133.0% +1.6% +39.8%
Institutions buying 140 151 8
Institutions selling 38 106 3
Buyers to sellers 3.68 1.42 2.67

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HTFLNEOGNNNN
HTFL 1.00 0.14 -0.06
NEOG 0.14 1.00 -0.09
NNNN -0.06 -0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HTFL, NEOG and NNNN?

Heartflow (HTFL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Heartflow (HTFL) $5.03B, Neogen (NEOG) $2.66B, Anbio Biotechnology (NNNN) $163.33M.

Which company is growing faster?

Heartflow (HTFL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Heartflow (HTFL) +42.5%, Neogen (NEOG) -0.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neogen (NEOG) has the highest net margin (Heartflow (HTFL) -49.4%, Neogen (NEOG) -6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Neogen (NEOG) returned the most: Heartflow (HTFL) +50.8%, Neogen (NEOG) +100.8%, Anbio Biotechnology (NNNN) -84.5%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Neogen (NEOG) has been the steadiest (Heartflow (HTFL) 76.7%, Neogen (NEOG) 55.6%, Anbio Biotechnology (NNNN) 135.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HTFL, NEOG and NNNN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Neogen (NEOG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.