HSBC vs USB vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Hsbc Holdings, Us Bancorp \De\ and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HSBC Hsbc Holdings Plc
$86.01 -14.8% 1M +28.0% 1Y
Market cap
$300.02B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.16B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
7 wins
USB Us Bancorp \De\
$59.75 +0.7% 1M +25.0% 1Y
Market cap
$92.59B
P/E
11.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.58B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.55 +26.0% 1M -73.5% 1Y
Market cap
$513.04M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Hsbc Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Hsbc Holdings 7, Us Bancorp \De\ 3, UWM Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHSBCUSBUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $300.02B $92.59B $513.04M HSBC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.3x 11.9x -13.8x HSBC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.5x 11.6x 8.2x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1,900.0% +6.7% +26.1% HSBC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.9% 26.4% -1.0% HSBC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.6% 6.3% USB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.8x 10.6x USB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.0% +25.0% -73.5% HSBC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.1%/yr -0.4%/yr -25.6%/yr HSBC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.3% 22.2% 80.1% USB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 48/100 36/100 HSBC

Percentile Scorecard

HSBCUSBUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHSBCUSBUWMC
Valuation 13 #313 of 360 42 #210 of 360 20 #136 of 169
Growth 70 #58 of 191 50 #97 of 191 16 #135 of 160
Profitability 86 #25 of 168 80 #34 of 168 32 #102 of 149
Financial Health – 12 #154 of 175 18 #130 of 158
Shareholder Returns 90 #34 of 341 54 #156 of 341 95 #8 of 136
Overall 65 48 36
  • HSBC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • USB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHSBCUSBUWMCSPY
1 month -14.8%+0.7%+26.0% -0.2%
3 months -17.0%-7.3%-17.1% +3.9%
6 months -4.4%+6.3%-57.5% +8.2%
Year to date +9.3%+12.0%-64.6% +12.9%
1 year +28.0%+25.0%-73.5% +12.3%
3 years +134.3%+95.0%-68.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +32.8%+25.0%-32.3% +23.3%
5 years +182.8%-1.9%-77.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +23.1%-0.4%-25.6% +10.9%
10 years +126.2%+33.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +8.5%+2.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureHSBCUSBUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.3%22.2%80.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.1%23.2%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.260.611.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.991.13-0.92 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.6%-54.7%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.3%-8.7%-74.6% -1.2%
52-week high $107.85$65.41$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $67.20$45.47$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHSBCUSBUWMC
P/E now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 12.1x 11.9xmedian 12.1x -14.1xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 3.4x 3.1xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 7.5xmedian 5.0x 15.3xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x 7.4xmedian 10.9x -0.5xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 3.03median 1.34 0.98median 1.34 0.28median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHSBCUSBUWMC
Revenue $55.16B $29.58B $3.58B
Operating income $33.06B – –
Net income $28.08B $8.17B -$104.96M
Free cash flow – $12.53B -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) $7.53 $5.01 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $222.46B – $498.41M
Total debt – $96.01B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 3.51B 1.56B 337.53M
Enterprise value -$1.80T $92.59B -$1.78B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHSBCUSBUWMC
P/E 11.3x 11.9x -14.1x
P/FCF – 7.4x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.4x -0.5x
P/S 5.4x 3.1x 0.7x
P/B 1.5x 1.4x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 1.5x -0.6x
EV/EBITDA – 7.5x 15.3x
EV/EBIT -16.4x 7.8x 17.3x
EV/Revenue -9.8x 6.4x 2.2x
EV/FCF – 15.1x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 15.1x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.03 0.98 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHSBCUSBUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 1,900% 6.7% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.3% 3.2% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 40.9% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 51.5% 18.4% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.1% 12.1% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 68.0% 19.9% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.7% 12.2% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 68.8% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.9% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 68.8% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.9% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHSBCUSBUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 85.2% 14.6%
Operating margin 59.9% – –
Pretax margin 65.2% 34.5% -3.2%
Net margin 47.9% 26.4% -1.0%
FCF margin – 42.3% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 42.3% -135.9%
Return on equity 14.3% 12.2% -8.1%
Return on assets 0.8% 1.1% -0.6%
Return on invested capital – 12.6% 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.5x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHSBCUSBUWMC
Debt / assets – 13.2% 33.5%
Debt / equity – 1.4x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.8x 10.6x
Debt / FCF – 7.7x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 94.3% 90.6% 94.5%
Equity / assets 5.7% 9.4% 5.5%
Interest coverage – 1.7x 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHSBCUSBUWMC
Dividend yield 4.4% 3.5% 19.4%
Net buyback yield – 0.7% –
Shareholder yield 4.4% 4.2% 19.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 39.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 25.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHSBCUSBUWMC
Forward P/E 9.5xFY2026 11.6xFY2026 8.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.02FY2026 $5.17FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.5%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.1% +18.8% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $70.05BFY2026 $30.11BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.3%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.0% +16.7% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHSBCUSBUWMC
Held by institutions 2.5% 81.6% 17.0%
Institutions holding 707 2,068 290
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.3% +2.1% +31.8%
Institutions buying 402 965 213
Institutions selling 180 760 50
Buyers to sellers 2.23 1.27 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HSBCUSBUWMC
HSBC 1.00 0.45 0.07
USB 0.45 1.00 0.19
UWMC 0.07 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HSBC, USB and UWMC?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) $300.02B, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) $92.59B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $513.04M.

Which stock is cheaper, HSBC, USB and UWMC?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 11.3x, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 11.9x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -13.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 9.5x, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 11.6x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 8.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +1,900.0%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) +6.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) has the highest net margin (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 47.9%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 26.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) leads (Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 12.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) returned the most: Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +28.0%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) +25.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.5%. Over five years, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) compounded fastest (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +23.1%/yr, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) -0.4%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 0.00%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 0.03%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%. Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) and UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) has been the steadiest (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 28.3%, Us Bancorp \De\ (USB) 22.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HSBC, USB and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.