HSBC vs DAN vs UBS Stock Comparison

Hsbc Holdings, Dana and UBS Group AG Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HSBC Hsbc Holdings Plc
$86.01 -14.8% 1M +28.0% 1Y
Market cap
$301.28B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.16B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
6 wins
DAN DANA Inc
$27.20 +0.2% 1M +37.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.81B
P/E
2.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.66B
Div. yield
0.02%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
2 wins
UBS UBS Group AG
$46.78 -5.8% 1M +21.2% 1Y
Market cap
$146.76B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Hsbc Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Hsbc Holdings 6, Dana 2, UBS Group AG 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHSBCDANUBSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $301.28B $2.81B $146.76B HSBC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.4x 2.5x — DAN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.5x 14.3x 12.2x HSBC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1,900.0% +3.7% — HSBC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.9% 14.6% — HSBC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.0% +37.4% +21.2% DAN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.1%/yr +3.8%/yr +20.8%/yr HSBC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.3% 44.1% 26.9% UBS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 61/100 — HSBC

Percentile Scorecard

HSBCDANUBS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHSBCDANUBS
Valuation 13 #313 of 360 95 #11 of 203 –
Growth 70 #58 of 191 83 #33 of 188 –
Profitability 86 #25 of 168 46 #100 of 183 –
Financial Health – 21 #172 of 217 23 #135 of 175
Shareholder Returns 90 #34 of 341 63 #58 of 153 11 #303 of 341
Overall 65 61 –
  • HSBC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • DAN ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • UBS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHSBCDANUBSSPY
1 month -14.8%+0.2%-5.8% -0.2%
3 months -17.0%-0.7%-10.1% +3.9%
6 months -4.4%-27.7%+11.1% +8.2%
Year to date +9.3%+14.5%+1.0% +12.9%
1 year +28.0%+37.4%+21.2% +12.3%
3 years +134.3%+115.5%+100.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +32.8%+29.2%+26.1% +23.3%
5 years +182.8%+20.5%+157.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year +23.1%+3.8%+20.8% +10.9%
10 years +126.2%+78.8%+234.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +8.5%+6.0%+12.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureHSBCDANUBSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.3%44.1%26.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.1%46.1%28.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.261.301.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.990.850.79 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.6%-69.7%-34.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.3%-30.1%-16.1% -1.2%
52-week high $107.85$38.93$55.73 $779.14
52-week low $67.20$19.47$36.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHSBCDANUBS
P/E now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 12.1x 2.6xmedian 25.2x —median 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 3.4x 0.4xmedian 1.9x —median 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 7.0xmedian 14.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x 20.5xmedian 21.7x —median 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.2x 1.5xmedian 2.3x 1.8xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.03median 1.34 0.02median 1.32 —median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHSBCDANUBS
Revenue $55.16B $7.66B –
Gross profit – $725.00M –
Operating income $33.06B $210.00M –
Net income $28.08B $1.13B –
Free cash flow – $143.00M –
EPS (diluted) $7.53 $10.18 –
Cash & equivalents $222.46B $331.00M $215.72B
Total debt – $1.34B $104.15B
Shares (diluted) 3.51B 109.50M 3.29B
Enterprise value -$1.80T $1.12B -$783.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHSBCDANUBS
P/E 11.3x 2.6x –
P/FCF – 20.5x –
P/Operating cash flow – 6.4x –
P/S 5.4x 0.4x –
P/B 1.5x 1.5x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 1.5x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA – 7.0x –
EV/EBIT -16.4x 18.8x –
EV/Revenue -9.8x 0.5x –
EV/FCF – 27.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 8.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.03 0.02 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHSBCDANUBS
Revenue growth (1Y) 1,900% 3.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.3% -9.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 79.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -6.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 40.9% 307.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 6.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 51.5% 28,400% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.1% 83.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 68.0% 6,201% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.7% 108.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 49.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -8.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 180.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHSBCDANUBS
Gross margin – 9.5% –
EBITDA margin – 7.3% –
Operating margin 59.9% 2.7% –
Pretax margin 65.2% 1.0% –
Net margin 47.9% 14.6% –
FCF margin – 1.9% –
Operating cash flow margin – 6.0% –
Return on equity 14.3% 56.6% –
Return on assets 0.8% 18.6% –
Return on invested capital – 0.0% –
Return on capital employed – 5.3% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 1.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHSBCDANUBS
Debt / assets – 22.0% 1.7%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.8x –
Debt / FCF – 9.4x –
Liabilities / assets 94.3% 67.6% 94.8%
Equity / assets 5.7% 32.4% 5.2%
Interest coverage – 1.5x –
Current ratio – 1.5x –
Quick ratio – 0.9x –
Cash ratio – 0.2x –
Altman Z-score – 2.29 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHSBCDANUBS
Dividend yield 4.4% 1.7% 1.2%
Net buyback yield – 19.2% –
Shareholder yield 4.4% 20.9% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 4.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -12.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -4.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHSBCDANUBS
Forward P/E 9.5xFY2026 14.3xFY2026 12.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.02FY2026 $1.90FY2026 $3.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.5%FY2026 +413.5%FY2026 +38.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.1% +128.4% +14.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $70.05BFY2026 $8.05BFY2026 $52.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.3%FY2026 +7.3%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.0% +34.2% +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHSBCDANUBS
Held by institutions 2.5% 99.2% –
Institutions holding 707 342 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.3% +1.8% –
Institutions buying 402 168 –
Institutions selling 180 126 –
Buyers to sellers 2.23 1.33 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HSBCDANUBS
HSBC 1.00 0.32 0.58
DAN 0.32 1.00 0.25
UBS 0.58 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HSBC, DAN and UBS?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) $301.28B, Dana (DAN) $2.81B, UBS Group AG (UBS) $146.76B.

Which stock is cheaper, HSBC, DAN and UBS?

Dana (DAN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 11.4x, Dana (DAN) 2.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) is cheapest (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 9.5x, Dana (DAN) 14.3x, UBS Group AG (UBS) 12.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +1,900.0%, Dana (DAN) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) has the highest net margin (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 47.9%, Dana (DAN) 14.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dana (DAN) returned the most: Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +28.0%, Dana (DAN) +37.4%, UBS Group AG (UBS) +21.2%. Over five years, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) compounded fastest (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +23.1%/yr, Dana (DAN) +3.8%/yr, UBS Group AG (UBS) +20.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 0.00%, Dana (DAN) 0.02%, UBS Group AG (UBS) 0.00%. Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) and UBS Group AG (UBS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, UBS Group AG (UBS) has been the steadiest (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 28.3%, Dana (DAN) 44.1%, UBS Group AG (UBS) 26.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HSBC, DAN and UBS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.