HOLO vs SSGC vs PL Stock Comparison

MicroCloud Hologram, SafeSpace Global and Planet Labs PBC Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SSGC SafeSpace Global Corp
$0.06 -25.0% 1M -82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$53.72K
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
PL Planet Labs PBC
$14.49 -16.8% 1M +8.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.15B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$378.28M
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Planet Labs PBC leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Planet Labs PBC 6, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHOLOSSGCPLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.01M $12.32M $5.15B PL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -1.6x -14.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -73.3% +44.1% PL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -14,125.2% -95.1% PL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -73.7% -82.4% +8.9% PL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -89.2%/yr -19.7%/yr +7.6%/yr PL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.1% 143.0% 91.7% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 19/100 35/100 PL

Percentile Scorecard

HOLOSSGCPL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHOLOSSGCPL
Valuation – 1 #123 of 124 33 #83 of 124
Growth – 5 #108 of 113 44 #64 of 113
Profitability – 3 #106 of 109 38 #68 of 109
Financial Health 99 #2 of 127 69 #40 of 127 47 #68 of 127
Shareholder Returns – – 16 #55 of 65
Overall – 19 35
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SSGC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • PL ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHOLOSSGCPLSPY
1 month -28.1%-25.0%-16.8% -0.2%
3 months -25.9%-40.0%-29.0% +3.9%
6 months -28.1%-45.5%-58.6% +8.2%
Year to date -54.5%-72.7%-26.5% +12.9%
1 year -73.7%-82.4%+8.9% +12.3%
3 years -100.0%-40.0%+600.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -93.6%-15.7%+91.4% +23.3%
5 years -100.0%-66.7%+44.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year -89.2%-19.7%+7.6% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureHOLOSSGCPLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.1%143.0%91.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.3%175.4%82.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.44-0.362.65 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.10-0.580.10 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-95.8%-85.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.7%-82.4%-71.8% -1.2%
52-week high $4.57$0.34$51.40 $779.14
52-week low $1.16$0.06$11.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHOLOSSGCPL
P/E now vs peer median —median 38.6x -1.5xmedian 38.6x -14.5xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.4x 212.1xmedian 4.4x 13.9xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x -1.9xmedian 34.5x -72.6xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 29.4x -2.5xmedian 29.4x 213.6xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 3.3x 5.8xmedian 3.3x 9.3xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.28 0.12median 1.28 0.65median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHOLOSSGCPL
Revenue – $53.72K $378.28M
Gross profit – $25.36K $209.65M
Operating income – -$7.80M -$102.74M
Net income – -$7.59M -$359.87M
Free cash flow – -$4.52M $24.67M
R&D – – $128.10M
EPS (diluted) – $-0.04 $-1.00
Cash & equivalents $110.42M $1.74M $415.13M
Total debt $1.87M – –
Shares (diluted) 13.18M 189.55M 359.59M
Enterprise value -$2.17B -$6.79M $2.24B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHOLOSSGCPL
P/E – -1.5x -14.5x
P/FCF – -2.5x 213.6x
P/Operating cash flow – -2.1x 44.8x
P/S – 212.1x 13.9x
P/B 0.0x 5.8x 9.3x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 5.9x 9.8x
EV/EBITDA – -1.9x -72.6x
EV/EBIT – -1.2x -42.9x
EV/Revenue – 179.7x 11.6x
EV/FCF – -2.1x 178.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – -1.7x 37.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.12 0.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHOLOSSGCPL
Revenue growth (1Y) – -73.3% 44.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 21.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 35.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 24.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -107.0% -24.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -100.2% 16.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – -125.5% -297.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -82.7% -33.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – -96.6% -236.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -12.0% -22.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -203.2% 41.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -260.2% 55.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -148.0% -30.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -236.9% 31.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHOLOSSGCPL
Gross margin – 47.2% 55.4%
EBITDA margin – -9,232% -16.0%
Operating margin – -14,518% -27.2%
Pretax margin – -14,283% -93.8%
Net margin – -14,125% -95.1%
FCF margin – -8,418% 6.5%
Operating cash flow margin – -10,294% 31.1%
Return on equity – -210.5% -71.4%
Return on assets – -177.3% -26.8%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -198.3% -10.4%
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.7x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 1,842% 16.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHOLOSSGCPL
Debt / assets 0.0% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 2.9% 34.8% 60.6%
Equity / assets 97.1% 65.2% 39.4%
Interest coverage – – -18.7x
Current ratio 34.6x 5.4x 2.8x
Quick ratio 107.3x 4.4x 2.6x
Cash ratio 107.0x 4.4x 2.5x
Altman Z-score – -13.96 2.66

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHOLOSSGCPL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -5.0%
Shareholder yield – – -5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHOLOSSGCPL
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-0.05FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $413.71MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +34.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +41.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHOLOSSGCPL
Held by institutions 3.0% – 74.3%
Institutions holding 16 – 481
Change in shares held, QoQ +135.7% – +6.1%
Institutions buying 11 – 271
Institutions selling 0 – 161
Buyers to sellers – – 1.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HOLOSSGCPL
HOLO 1.00 -0.02 0.32
SSGC -0.02 1.00 0.01
PL 0.32 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HOLO, SSGC and PL?

Planet Labs PBC (PL) is the largest by market capitalisation: MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $16.01M, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) $12.32M, Planet Labs PBC (PL) $5.15B.

Which company is growing faster?

Planet Labs PBC (PL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -73.3%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) +44.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Planet Labs PBC (PL) has the highest net margin (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -14,125.2%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) -95.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Planet Labs PBC (PL) returned the most: MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -73.7%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -82.4%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) +8.9%. Over five years, Planet Labs PBC (PL) compounded fastest (MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -19.7%/yr, Planet Labs PBC (PL) +7.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.1%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) 143.0%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) 91.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HOLO, SSGC and PL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Planet Labs PBC (PL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.