HOLO vs ODYS vs NEON Stock Comparison

MicroCloud Hologram, Odysight.ai and Neonode Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ODYS Odysight.ai Inc.
$2.08 -30.7% 1M -39.9% 1Y
Market cap
$30.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.02M
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
3 wins
NEON Neonode Inc.
$0.69 -22.5% 1M -78.5% 1Y
Market cap
$11.75M
P/E
1.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.04M
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Odysight.ai leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Odysight.ai 3, Neonode 3, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHOLOODYSNEONLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.55M $30.37M $11.75M ODYS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -1.8x 1.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -23.9% -21.7% NEON
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -565.0% 398.1% NEON
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -72.0% -39.9% -78.5% ODYS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -89.1%/yr -24.0%/yr -40.1%/yr ODYS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.0% 74.3% 73.0% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 25/100 65/100 NEON

Percentile Scorecard

HOLOODYSNEON

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHOLOODYSNEON
Valuation – 7 #115 of 124 76 #31 of 124
Growth – 17 #94 of 113 35 #74 of 113
Profitability – 7 #101 of 109 64 #40 of 109
Financial Health 99 #2 of 127 91 #12 of 127 87 #18 of 127
Shareholder Returns – 3 #61 of 63 –
Overall – 25 65
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ODYS ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NEON ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHOLOODYSNEONSPY
1 month -24.7%-30.7%-22.5% +0.9%
3 months -21.3%-50.6%-8.0% +5.9%
6 months -21.3%-58.4%-56.1% +8.5%
Year to date -53.8%-37.0%-60.3% +13.3%
1 year -72.0%-39.9%-78.5% +12.4%
3 years -100.0%-23.0%-40.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year -93.5%-8.3%-15.7% +23.5%
5 years -100.0%-74.6%-92.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -89.1%-24.0%-40.1% +11.0%
10 years ——-94.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——-25.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureHOLOODYSNEONSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.0%74.3%73.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.3%71.5%81.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.450.262.40 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.07-0.54-1.08 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-82.8%-97.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.0%-71.5%-78.5% -0.9%
52-week high $4.52$7.30$3.21 $779.14
52-week low $1.16$2.07$0.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHOLOODYSNEON
P/E now vs peer median —median 37.9x -1.9xmedian 37.9x 1.4xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.4x 11.3xmedian 4.4x 5.7xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x -0.5xmedian 34.5x -1.4xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 26.6x -2.5xmedian 26.6x -1.0xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 3.4x 1.3xmedian 3.4x 0.6xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.24 -0.28median 1.24 0.03median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHOLOODYSNEON
Revenue – $3.02M $2.04M
Gross profit – $871.00K $2.02M
Operating income – -$18.14M $7.05M
Net income – -$17.04M $8.13M
Free cash flow – -$13.76M -$11.28M
R&D – $9.64M $3.64M
EPS (diluted) – $-1.07 $0.48
Cash & equivalents $110.42M $25.68M $21.32M
Total debt $1.87M – –
Shares (diluted) 13.18M 15.90M 16.78M
Enterprise value -$2.17B -$94.58M -$69.75M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHOLOODYSNEON
P/E – -1.9x 1.4x
P/FCF – -2.5x -1.0x
P/Operating cash flow – -2.5x -1.0x
P/S – 11.3x 5.7x
P/B 0.0x 1.3x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 1.3x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA – -0.5x -1.4x
EV/EBIT – -0.5x -1.4x
EV/Revenue – 2.8x -4.8x
EV/FCF – -0.6x 0.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – -0.6x 0.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.28 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHOLOODYSNEON
Revenue growth (1Y) – -23.9% -21.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 65.5% -28.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -24.7% -19.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 42.6% -25.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -45.0% 200.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -24.3% 48.9%
Net income growth (1Y) – -44.8% 228.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -21.6% 53.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – -4.2% 228.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 6.9% 52.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -66.8% -100.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -31.0% -42.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -66.4% -101.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -30.3% -42.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHOLOODYSNEON
Gross margin – 28.9% 98.8%
EBITDA margin – -597.6% 348.6%
Operating margin – -601.5% 345.6%
Pretax margin – -601.5% 383.2%
Net margin – -565.0% 398.1%
FCF margin – -456.4% -552.8%
Operating cash flow margin – -454.5% -548.4%
Return on equity – -66.5% 37.2%
Return on assets – -58.6% 33.5%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -64.9% 31.8%
Asset turnover – 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x -1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 102.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHOLOODYSNEON
Debt / assets 0.0% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 2.9% 12.3% 12.2%
Equity / assets 97.1% 87.7% 87.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 34.6x 9.2x 10.9x
Quick ratio 107.3x 8.9x 10.6x
Cash ratio 107.0x 8.6x 10.3x
Altman Z-score – 1.76 -8.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHOLOODYSNEON
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -62.2% –
Shareholder yield – -62.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHOLOODYSNEON
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.23FY2026 $-0.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -177.1%FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.78MFY2026 $3.71MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -41.0%FY2026 +76.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +139.2% +26.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHOLOODYSNEON
Held by institutions 3.0% – 11.6%
Institutions holding 16 – 51
Change in shares held, QoQ +135.7% – -35.0%
Institutions buying 11 – 25
Institutions selling 0 – 24
Buyers to sellers – – 1.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HOLOODYSNEON
HOLO 1.00 0.03 0.33
ODYS 0.03 1.00 0.03
NEON 0.33 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HOLO, ODYS and NEON?

Odysight.ai (ODYS) is the largest by market capitalisation: MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $15.55M, Odysight.ai (ODYS) $30.37M, Neonode (NEON) $11.75M.

Which company is growing faster?

Neonode (NEON) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Odysight.ai (ODYS) -23.9%, Neonode (NEON) -21.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neonode (NEON) has the highest net margin (Odysight.ai (ODYS) -565.0%, Neonode (NEON) 398.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Odysight.ai (ODYS) returned the most: MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -72.0%, Odysight.ai (ODYS) -39.9%, Neonode (NEON) -78.5%. Over five years, Odysight.ai (ODYS) compounded fastest (MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.1%/yr, Odysight.ai (ODYS) -24.0%/yr, Neonode (NEON) -40.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.0%, Odysight.ai (ODYS) 74.3%, Neonode (NEON) 73.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HOLO, ODYS and NEON?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Odysight.ai (ODYS) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.