HOLO vs AISP vs SSGC Stock Comparison

MicroCloud Hologram, Airship AI Holdings and SafeSpace Global Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SSGC SafeSpace Global Corp
$0.07 -22.2% 1M -80.6% 1Y
Market cap
$12.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$53.72K
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Airship AI Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Airship AI Holdings 5, SafeSpace Global 1, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHOLOAISPSSGCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.94M $77.31M $12.32M AISP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 2.9x -1.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +32.2% -73.3% AISP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 144.6% -14,125.2% AISP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -74.0% -57.6% -80.6% AISP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -89.2%/yr -26.1%/yr -16.3%/yr SSGC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.2% 78.6% 142.3% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 46/100 19/100 AISP

Percentile Scorecard

HOLOAISPSSGC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHOLOAISPSSGC
Valuation – 61 #49 of 124 1 #123 of 124
Growth – 84 #19 of 113 5 #108 of 113
Profitability – 43 #63 of 110 3 #107 of 110
Financial Health 99 #2 of 129 34 #85 of 129 70 #40 of 129
Shareholder Returns – 9 #61 of 67 –
Overall – 46 19
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • AISP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SSGC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHOLOAISPSSGCSPY
1 month -30.5%+18.7%-22.2% -0.8%
3 months -29.7%+9.6%-30.0% +3.5%
6 months -32.9%-9.2%-41.7% +7.0%
Year to date -56.1%-25.3%-68.2% +12.2%
1 year -74.0%-57.6%-80.6% +13.0%
3 years -100.0%-79.7%-30.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -93.7%-41.2%-11.2% +23.1%
5 years -100.0%-77.9%-58.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -89.2%-26.1%-16.3% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureHOLOAISPSSGCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.2%78.6%142.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.3%72.7%172.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.432.53-0.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.10-0.73-0.57 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-87.6%-95.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.6%-56.5%-80.6% -1.8%
52-week high $4.57$4.96$0.36 $779.14
52-week low $1.16$1.71$0.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHOLOAISPSSGC
P/E now vs peer median —median 38.1x 2.8xmedian 38.1x -1.7xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.3x 4.1xmedian 4.3x 247.4xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 35.4x —median 35.4x -2.3xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 27.1x -21.2xmedian 27.1x -2.9xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 3.4x -8.6xmedian 3.4x 6.8xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.27 0.04median 1.27 0.15median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHOLOAISPSSGC
Revenue – $18.15M $53.72K
Gross profit – $10.19M $25.36K
Operating income – -$6.55M -$7.80M
Net income – $26.24M -$7.59M
Free cash flow – -$3.51M -$4.52M
R&D – $3.31M –
EPS (diluted) – $0.76 $-0.04
Cash & equivalents $110.42M $12.37M $1.74M
Total debt $1.87M – –
Shares (diluted) 13.18M 34.44M 189.55M
Enterprise value -$2.17B $34.87M -$6.79M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHOLOAISPSSGC
P/E – 2.8x -1.7x
P/FCF – -21.2x -2.9x
P/Operating cash flow – -21.2x -2.4x
P/S – 4.1x 247.4x
P/B 0.0x -8.6x 6.8x
P/Tangible book 0.0x -8.6x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA – – -2.3x
EV/EBIT – -9.5x -1.5x
EV/Revenue – 3.4x 215.1x
EV/FCF – -17.7x -2.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – -17.7x -2.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.04 0.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHOLOAISPSSGC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 32.2% -73.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 42.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 3.9% -107.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 2.1% -100.2%
Net income growth (1Y) – 159.6% -125.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 62.4% -82.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – 155.2% -96.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 68.4% -12.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 44.1% -203.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -2.7% -260.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 44.1% -148.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -2.7% -236.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHOLOAISPSSGC
Gross margin – 56.2% 47.2%
EBITDA margin – – -9,232%
Operating margin – -36.1% -14,518%
Pretax margin – -36.1% -14,283%
Net margin – 144.6% -14,125%
FCF margin – -19.3% -8,418%
Operating cash flow margin – -19.3% -10,294%
Return on equity – – -210.5%
Return on assets – -35.5% -177.3%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -50.0% -198.3%
Asset turnover – 1.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -0.1x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 13.5% 1,842%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHOLOAISPSSGC
Debt / assets 0.0% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 2.9% 148.6% 34.8%
Equity / assets 97.1% -48.6% 65.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 34.6x 3.2x 5.4x
Quick ratio 107.3x 3.0x 4.4x
Cash ratio 107.0x 2.3x 4.4x
Altman Z-score – -1.56 -12.87

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHOLOAISPSSGC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -12.9% –
Shareholder yield – -12.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHOLOAISPSSGC
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.06FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -107.9%FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $28.14MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +83.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +36.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHOLOAISPSSGC
Held by institutions 3.0% 14.5% –
Institutions holding 16 79 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +135.7% -29.3% –
Institutions buying 11 41 –
Institutions selling 0 27 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.52 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HOLOAISPSSGC
HOLO 1.00 0.50 -0.02
AISP 0.50 1.00 0.08
SSGC -0.02 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HOLO, AISP and SSGC?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) is the largest by market capitalisation: MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $15.94M, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) $77.31M, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) $12.32M.

Which company is growing faster?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) +32.2%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -73.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) has the highest net margin (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 144.6%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -14,125.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Airship AI Holdings (AISP) returned the most: MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -74.0%, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -57.6%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -80.6%. Over five years, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) compounded fastest (MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -26.1%/yr, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -16.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.2%, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 78.6%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) 142.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HOLO, AISP and SSGC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.