HMR vs RBA vs LSTR Stock Comparison

Heidmar Maritime Holdings, Rb Global and Landstar System Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RBA Rb Global Inc.
$85.01 +3.1% 1M -16.2% 1Y
Market cap
$15.74B
P/E
36.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.85B
Div. yield
1.48%
Logistics Industrials
6 wins
LSTR Landstar System Inc
$168.78 +3.1% 1M +30.3% 1Y
Market cap
$5.73B
P/E
42.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
2.16%
Logistics Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Rb Global leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Rb Global 6, Heidmar Maritime Holdings 3, Landstar System 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHMRRBALSTRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $105.14M $15.74B $5.73B RBA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -8.8x 36.2x 42.2x RBA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.0x 20.4x 27.4x HMR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +187.3% +9.7% — HMR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14.5% 9.0% — RBA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.4% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.48% 2.16% LSTR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.5% -16.2% +30.3% HMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +4.6%/yr -0.6%/yr RBA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 86.9% 33.8% 35.1% RBA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 42/100 — RBA

Percentile Scorecard

HMRRBALSTR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHMRRBALSTR
Valuation 9 #124 of 136 24 #104 of 136 18 #112 of 136
Growth 90 #13 of 121 74 #32 of 121 –
Profitability 24 #88 of 115 43 #66 of 115 –
Financial Health – 49 #74 of 143 –
Shareholder Returns – 22 #64 of 82 40 #50 of 82
Overall 41 42 –
  • HMR ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • RBA ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • LSTR ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHMRRBALSTRSPY
1 month +1.7%+3.1%+3.1% -0.2%
3 months +60.7%-27.1%-8.9% +3.9%
6 months +127.7%-19.3%-7.5% +8.2%
Year to date +129.8%-17.4%+17.5% +12.9%
1 year +38.5%-16.2%+30.3% +12.3%
3 years —+36.6%+3.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+11.0%+1.2% +23.3%
5 years —+25.0%-2.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+4.6%-0.6% +10.9%
10 years —+146.8%+137.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+9.5%+9.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureHMRRBALSTRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 86.9%33.8%35.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.3%40.6%37.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.670.790.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.44-0.480.86 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.1%-33.0%-41.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.8%-28.6%-25.1% -1.2%
52-week high $1.91$119.14$225.37 $779.14
52-week low $0.77$79.80$121.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHMRRBALSTR
P/E now vs peer median -8.8xmedian 16.3x 36.2xmedian 16.3x 42.2xmedian 16.3x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.0x 3.2xmedian 1.0x 1.1xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -47.0xmedian 8.7x 14.0xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.4x 25.7xmedian 11.4x 31.6xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 1.2x 2.8xmedian 1.2x 6.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.82 0.75median 0.82 —median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHMRRBALSTR
Revenue $82.01M $4.85B –
Gross profit $79.44M $1.18B –
Operating income -$1.70M $777.60M –
Net income -$12.72M $484.40M –
Free cash flow – $611.20M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.20 $2.33 –
Cash & equivalents $28.70M $524.90M $297.32M
Total debt – $2.90B –
Shares (diluted) 58.26M 186.90M 33.94M
Enterprise value $18.95M $13.34B $5.73B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHMRRBALSTR
P/E -8.8x 36.2x 42.2x
P/FCF – 25.7x 31.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 18.3x –
P/S 1.3x 3.2x 1.1x
P/B 6.3x 2.8x 6.9x
P/Tangible book 6.3x 5.0x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA -47.0x 14.0x –
EV/EBIT -45.1x 23.3x –
EV/Revenue 0.9x 3.7x –
EV/FCF – 29.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 21.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.75 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHMRRBALSTR
Revenue growth (1Y) 187.3% 9.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 25.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 258.2% -41.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -2.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 47.5% 5.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 39.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 38.5% 15.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 48.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 43.6% 15.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 48.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -9.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 39.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -15.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 46.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHMRRBALSTR
Gross margin 96.9% 24.3% –
EBITDA margin -2.0% 26.6% –
Operating margin -2.1% 16.0% –
Pretax margin 0.0% 12.5% –
Net margin -14.5% 9.0% –
FCF margin – 12.6% –
Operating cash flow margin – 17.8% –
Return on equity -82.6% 8.6% –
Return on assets -14.5% 3.9% –
Return on invested capital – 7.4% –
Return on capital employed – 7.1% –
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHMRRBALSTR
Debt / assets – 23.3% –
Debt / equity – 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.8x –
Debt / FCF – 4.8x –
Liabilities / assets 83.3% 55.4% –
Equity / assets 16.7% 44.6% 45.9%
Interest coverage – 4.3x –
Current ratio – 1.3x 1.8x
Quick ratio – 1.0x –
Cash ratio – 0.4x –
Altman Z-score – 2.16 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHMRRBALSTR
Dividend yield – 1.5% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – 0.6% –
Shareholder yield – 2.1% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 55.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 43.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHMRRBALSTR
Forward P/E 10.0xFY2026 20.4xFY2026 27.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.18FY2026 $4.17FY2026 $6.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +4.8%FY2026 +85.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.6% +22.1% +27.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $91.14MFY2026 $5.33BFY2026 $5.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +63.2%FY2026 +16.7%FY2026 +15.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.4% -6.9% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHMRRBALSTR
Held by institutions – 96.6% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 556 543
Change in shares held, QoQ – +2.6% -2.8%
Institutions buying – 276 296
Institutions selling – 185 153
Buyers to sellers – 1.49 1.93

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HMRRBALSTR
HMR 1.00 0.13 0.01
RBA 0.13 1.00 0.35
LSTR 0.01 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HMR, RBA and LSTR?

Rb Global (RBA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) $105.14M, Rb Global (RBA) $15.74B, Landstar System (LSTR) $5.73B.

Which stock is cheaper, HMR, RBA and LSTR?

Rb Global (RBA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) -8.8x, Rb Global (RBA) 36.2x, Landstar System (LSTR) 42.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) is cheapest (Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) 10.0x, Rb Global (RBA) 20.4x, Landstar System (LSTR) 27.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) +187.3%, Rb Global (RBA) +9.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rb Global (RBA) has the highest net margin (Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) -14.5%, Rb Global (RBA) 9.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) returned the most: Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) +38.5%, Rb Global (RBA) -16.2%, Landstar System (LSTR) +30.3%. Over five years, Rb Global (RBA) compounded fastest (Rb Global (RBA) +4.6%/yr, Landstar System (LSTR) -0.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Landstar System (LSTR) has the highest dividend yield: Rb Global (RBA) 1.48%, Landstar System (LSTR) 2.16%. Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rb Global (RBA) has been the steadiest (Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) 86.9%, Rb Global (RBA) 33.8%, Landstar System (LSTR) 35.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HMR, RBA and LSTR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rb Global (RBA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.