HFUS vs HAFG vs STFS Stock Comparison

Hartford Creative, Holistic Asset Finance and Star Fashion Culture Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Hartford Creative leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Hartford Creative 5, Holistic Asset Finance 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHFUSHAFGSTFSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $50.05M $29.69M $4.71M HFUS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.0x -248.8x -1.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.4% +604.3% — HAFG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 56.1% -3.5% — HFUS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 60.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.5% -41.2% -45.3% HFUS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.6%/yr -15.2%/yr — HFUS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 107.6% 65.5% 171.6% HAFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 39/100 — HFUS

Percentile Scorecard

HFUSHAFGSTFS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHFUSHAFGSTFS
Valuation 8 #49 of 53 19 #43 of 53 60 #22 of 53
Growth 44 #25 of 44 100 #1 of 44 –
Profitability 78 #10 of 42 37 #27 of 42 –
Financial Health 37 #39 of 61 2 #60 of 61 77 #15 of 61
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 42 39 –
  • HFUS ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • HAFG ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • STFS ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHFUSHAFGSTFSSPY
1 month -26.2%0.0%+32.2% +0.9%
3 months -50.0%+14.3%-2.1% +5.9%
6 months -50.6%-2.4%+16.4% +8.5%
Year to date -60.0%-27.3%+16.7% +13.3%
1 year -1.5%-41.2%-45.3% +12.4%
3 years -43.2%-59.2%— +88.1%
3 years, per year -17.2%-25.8%— +23.5%
5 years +212.5%-56.0%— +68.2%
5 years, per year +25.6%-15.2%— +11.0%
10 years -66.7%+135.3%— +263.4%
10 years, per year -10.4%+8.9%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureHFUSHAFGSTFSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 107.6%65.5%171.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 219.2%331.4%177.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.030.140.97 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.01-0.63-0.26 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.1%-94.7%-99.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -62.7%-41.2%-74.4% -0.9%
52-week high $5.36$0.68$18.29 $779.14
52-week low $2.00$0.24$2.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHFUSHAFGSTFS
P/E now vs peer median 37.0xmedian 18.7x -248.8xmedian 18.7x -1.1xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 20.8xmedian 0.6x 8.8xmedian 0.6x 0.2xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.6x —median 10.6x —median 10.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -105.0xmedian 8.9x 1,237xmedian 8.9x -1.4xmedian 8.9x
P/B now vs peer median 53.6xmedian 1.6x -80.8xmedian 1.6x 0.4xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.25median 0.49 —median 0.49 —median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHFUSHAFGSTFS
Revenue $2.41M $3.39M –
Gross profit $2.43M $251.27K –
Operating income $1.64M -$44.46K –
Net income $1.35M -$119.33K –
Free cash flow -$476.73K $24.00K –
EPS (diluted) $0.05 $0.00 –
Cash & equivalents $160.42K $47.85K $69.36K
Total debt $5.73M – $553.46K
Shares (diluted) 25.03M 74.23M 999.33K
Enterprise value $49.62M $29.60M -$4.14M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHFUSHAFGSTFS
P/E 37.0x -248.8x -1.1x
P/FCF -105.0x 1,237x -1.4x
P/Operating cash flow -105.0x 1,237x –
P/S 20.8x 8.8x 0.2x
P/B 53.6x -80.8x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 53.6x -80.8x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT 31.4x -666.7x –
EV/Revenue 21.4x 8.7x –
EV/FCF -108.3x 1,235x –
EV/Operating cash flow -108.3x 1,235x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.25 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHFUSHAFGSTFS
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.4% 604.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 314.8% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.1% 138.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.7% 77.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 143.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -6.6% 42.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 59.9% – –
EPS growth (1Y) -6.6% 45.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 149.9% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -149.4% 258.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -90.5% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -149.4% 258.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -79.4% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHFUSHAFGSTFS
Gross margin 100.7% 7.4% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin 68.2% -1.3% –
Pretax margin 67.8% -2.4% –
Net margin 56.1% -3.5% –
FCF margin -19.8% 0.7% –
Operating cash flow margin -19.8% 0.7% –
Return on equity 209.1% – –
Return on assets 34.8% -3.5% –
Return on invested capital 60.0% – –
Return on capital employed 255.2% – –
Asset turnover 0.6x 2.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.4x -0.2x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHFUSHAFGSTFS
Debt / assets 41.3% – 2.8%
Debt / equity 1.8x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF -3.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 77.6% 123.1% 24.8%
Equity / assets 22.4% -23.1% 75.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.2x 0.8x 3.3x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.2x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 9.88 -51.81 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHFUSHAFGSTFS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHFUSHAFGSTFS

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HFUSHAFGSTFS
HFUS 1.00 0.00 -0.03
HAFG 0.00 1.00 0.03
STFS -0.03 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HFUS, HAFG and STFS?

Hartford Creative (HFUS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Hartford Creative (HFUS) $50.05M, Holistic Asset Finance (HAFG) $29.69M, Star Fashion Culture Holdings (STFS) $4.71M.

Which company is growing faster?

Holistic Asset Finance (HAFG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hartford Creative (HFUS) -0.4%, Holistic Asset Finance (HAFG) +604.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hartford Creative (HFUS) has the highest net margin (Hartford Creative (HFUS) 56.1%, Holistic Asset Finance (HAFG) -3.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hartford Creative (HFUS) returned the most: Hartford Creative (HFUS) -1.5%, Holistic Asset Finance (HAFG) -41.2%, Star Fashion Culture Holdings (STFS) -45.3%. Over five years, Hartford Creative (HFUS) compounded fastest (Hartford Creative (HFUS) +25.6%/yr, Holistic Asset Finance (HAFG) -15.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Holistic Asset Finance (HAFG) has been the steadiest (Hartford Creative (HFUS) 107.6%, Holistic Asset Finance (HAFG) 65.5%, Star Fashion Culture Holdings (STFS) 171.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HFUS, HAFG and STFS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hartford Creative (HFUS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.