GWW vs RS vs FERG Stock Comparison

W.W. Grainger, Reliance and Ferguson Enterprises Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc.
$1,350.12 +6.2% 1M +40.0% 1Y
Market cap
$64.13B
P/E
34.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.85B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Distribution Industrials
6 wins
RS Reliance, Inc.
$415.62 +8.1% 1M +51.8% 1Y
Market cap
$21.54B
P/E
24.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.81B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Distribution Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

W.W. Grainger leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (W.W. Grainger 6, Reliance 4, Ferguson Enterprises 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGWWRSFERGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $64.13B $21.54B $44.66B GWW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.3x 24.1x 22.0x FERG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.6x 16.3x 21.2x RS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +15.4% +5.2% RS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.9% 5.7% 6.5% GWW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 29.6% 10.5% 21.7% GWW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 0.9x 1.0x GWW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% RS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.0% +51.8% -7.4% RS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.3%/yr +22.7%/yr +8.7%/yr GWW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.5% 25.0% 29.9% GWW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 54/100 67/100 FERG

Percentile Scorecard

GWWRSFERG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGWWRSFERG
Valuation 7 #43 of 46 38 #29 of 46 49 #24 of 46
Growth 55 #18 of 39 40 #24 of 39 76 #10 of 39
Profitability 97 #2 of 40 56 #18 of 40 87 #6 of 40
Financial Health 71 #15 of 49 81 #10 of 49 48 #26 of 49
Shareholder Returns 58 #14 of 32 55 #15 of 32 74 #9 of 32
Overall 58 54 67
  • GWW ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • RS ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • FERG ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGWWRSFERGSPY
1 month +6.2%+8.1%+2.6% -1.0%
3 months -2.3%+1.9%-1.6% +2.9%
6 months +17.6%+18.2%-13.9% +6.4%
Year to date +33.8%+43.9%+1.9% +11.4%
1 year +40.0%+51.8%-7.4% +13.1%
3 years +96.6%+68.3%+48.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year +25.3%+19.0%+14.1% +21.5%
5 years +208.9%+178.4%+51.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year +25.3%+22.7%+8.7% +10.9%
10 years +562.6%+508.0%+308.8% +255.2%
10 years, per year +20.8%+19.8%+15.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureGWWRSFERGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.5%25.0%29.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.5%25.0%30.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.500.591.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.702.08-0.25 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -24.8%-22.9%-43.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.7%-3.0%-15.2% -2.5%
52-week high $1,402.04$428.49$267.71 $779.14
52-week low $918.18$265.93$214.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGWWRSFERG
P/E now vs peer median 34.1xmedian 25.9x 23.7xmedian 25.9x 21.8xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 1.0x 1.3xmedian 1.0x 1.4xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.8xmedian 13.0x 15.0xmedian 13.0x 14.8xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 42.1xmedian 23.0x 39.3xmedian 23.0x 19.5xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 2.4x 2.9xmedian 2.4x 7.5xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 8.37median 2.37 -1.99median 2.37 —median 2.37

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGWWRSFERG
Revenue $18.85B $15.81B $31.35B
Gross profit $7.42B $4.46B $9.73B
Operating income $2.75B $1.24B $2.82B
Net income $1.98B $896.10M $2.03B
Free cash flow $1.51B $539.50M $2.26B
EPS (diluted) $39.62 $17.40 $10.42
Cash & equivalents $589.00M $235.40M $820.00M
Total debt $2.41B $6.16B $4.13B
Shares (diluted) 47.20M 51.38M 194.80M
Enterprise value $61.72B $20.58B $41.88B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGWWRSFERG
P/E 34.1x 23.7x 21.8x
P/FCF 42.1x 39.3x 19.5x
P/Operating cash flow 29.2x 24.9x 16.8x
P/S 3.4x 1.3x 1.4x
P/B 14.1x 2.9x 7.5x
P/Tangible book 15.0x 3.3x 8.4x
EV/EBITDA 21.8x 15.0x 14.8x
EV/EBIT 23.8x 18.3x 16.8x
EV/Revenue 3.5x 1.4x 1.5x
EV/FCF 43.3x 42.0x 20.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.1x 26.6x 18.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 8.37 -1.99 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGWWRSFERG
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 15.4% 5.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 0.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.2% 11.1% 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.6% -2.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 2.8% 23.3% 17.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.3% -15.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) -1.4% 21.0% 31.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.5% -16.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) -0.9% 24.8% 34.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.1% -11.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 5.5% -30.8% 35.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.8% -26.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.6% -35.2% 42.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.6% -31.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGWWRSFERG
Gross margin 39.4% 28.2% 31.0%
EBITDA margin 15.9% 9.6% 10.2%
Operating margin 14.6% 7.8% 9.0%
Pretax margin 14.2% 7.5% 8.3%
Net margin 9.9% 5.7% 6.5%
FCF margin 8.0% 3.4% 7.2%
Operating cash flow margin 11.5% 5.4% 8.3%
Return on equity 44.7% 12.3% 34.0%
Return on assets 20.8% 8.2% 11.4%
Return on invested capital 29.6% 10.5% 21.7%
Return on capital employed 37.1% 12.6% 23.4%
Asset turnover 2.0x 1.4x 1.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.0x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% 0.4% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGWWRSFERG
Debt / assets 25.0% 14.9% 23.2%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.2x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 0.9x 1.0x
Debt / FCF 1.6x 3.1x 1.8x
Liabilities / assets 53.1% 33.6% 67.0%
Equity / assets 46.9% 66.4% 33.0%
Interest coverage – 19.5x –
Current ratio 2.8x 4.3x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.6x 2.1x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 13.17 6.52 5.39

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGWWRSFERG
Dividend yield 0.7% 1.2% 1.6%
Net buyback yield 1.5% 2.3% 1.9%
Shareholder yield 2.2% 3.5% 3.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 25.0% 28.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 32.8% 47.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.5% 2.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 9.1% 4.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGWWRSFERG
Forward P/E 27.6xFY2026 16.3xFY2026 21.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $48.95FY2026 $25.46FY2026 $10.70FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +24.0%FY2026 +78.5%FY2026 +7.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.9% +1.8% +20.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $20.21BFY2026 $16.78BFY2026 $34.27BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 +17.4%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% +10.5% -0.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGWWRSFERG
Held by institutions 75.5% 82.3% 96.3%
Institutions holding 1,364 688 937
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +1.0% +2.1%
Institutions buying 656 341 477
Institutions selling 428 229 343
Buyers to sellers 1.53 1.49 1.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GWWRSFERG
GWW 1.00 0.29 0.38
RS 0.29 1.00 0.37
FERG 0.38 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GWW, RS and FERG?

W.W. Grainger (GWW) is the largest by market capitalisation: W.W. Grainger (GWW) $64.13B, Reliance (RS) $21.54B, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) $44.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, GWW, RS and FERG?

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (W.W. Grainger (GWW) 34.3x, Reliance (RS) 24.1x, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 22.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Reliance (RS) is cheapest (W.W. Grainger (GWW) 27.6x, Reliance (RS) 16.3x, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 21.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Reliance (RS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: W.W. Grainger (GWW) +7.8%, Reliance (RS) +15.4%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) +5.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

W.W. Grainger (GWW) has the highest net margin (W.W. Grainger (GWW) 9.9%, Reliance (RS) 5.7%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 6.5%). On return on invested capital, W.W. Grainger (GWW) leads (W.W. Grainger (GWW) 29.6%, Reliance (RS) 10.5%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 21.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Reliance (RS) returned the most: W.W. Grainger (GWW) +40.0%, Reliance (RS) +51.8%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) -7.4%. Over five years, W.W. Grainger (GWW) compounded fastest (W.W. Grainger (GWW) +25.3%/yr, Reliance (RS) +22.7%/yr, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) +8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Reliance (RS) has the highest dividend yield: W.W. Grainger (GWW) 0.01%, Reliance (RS) 0.01%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 0.00%. Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, W.W. Grainger (GWW) has been the steadiest (W.W. Grainger (GWW) 23.5%, Reliance (RS) 25.0%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 29.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GWW, RS and FERG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, W.W. Grainger (GWW) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.