GWRE vs VRSK vs FORTY Stock Comparison

Guidewire Software, Verisk Analytics and Formula Systems (1985) Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$197.85 +21.2% 1M -10.1% 1Y
Market cap
$27.48B
P/E
31.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.14B
Div. yield
–
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Verisk Analytics leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Verisk Analytics 6, Formula Systems (1985) 3, Guidewire Software 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGWREVRSKFORTYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.07B $27.48B $1.69B VRSK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 101.0x 31.0x 2.7x FORTY
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 41.6x 24.8x — VRSK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.7% +5.0% +24.8% FORTY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.4% 28.2% 21.6% VRSK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% 31.9% 10.1% VRSK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 2.3x — GWRE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.4% -10.1% -14.9% VRSK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.3%/yr -1.6%/yr +1.3%/yr GWRE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.9% 35.7% 55.2% VRSK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 55/100 86/100 FORTY

Percentile Scorecard

GWREVRSKFORTY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGWREVRSKFORTY
Valuation 39 #61 of 99 29 #684 of 963 98 #2 of 52
Growth 89 #11 of 94 44 #460 of 823 89 #6 of 46
Profitability 79 #20 of 90 97 #30 of 845 83 #8 of 42
Financial Health 76 #26 of 105 31 #617 of 896 60 #25 of 61
Shareholder Returns 57 #28 of 63 72 #206 of 731 100 #1 of 30
Overall 68 55 86
  • GWRE ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • VRSK ranked among 1,001 companies in Financial Services
  • FORTY ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGWREVRSKFORTYSPY
1 month +4.6%+21.2%+5.0% -1.0%
3 months +6.4%+4.8%+9.6% -0.4%
6 months +30.2%+15.7%-16.1% +4.5%
Year to date -15.1%-11.6%-28.6% +12.4%
1 year -23.4%-10.1%-14.9% +13.6%
3 years +86.6%-14.2%+89.2% +76.4%
3 years, per year +23.1%-5.0%+23.7% +20.8%
5 years +35.8%-7.8%+6.9% +63.7%
5 years, per year +6.3%-1.6%+1.3% +10.4%
10 years +200.4%+142.0%+211.3% +267.7%
10 years, per year +11.6%+9.2%+12.0% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureGWREVRSKFORTYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.9%35.7%55.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.6%36.4%83.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.67-0.460.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.37-0.28-0.27 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -60.8%-51.2%-55.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.4%-12.1%-37.4% -1.6%
52-week high $222.78$225.07$190.56 $779.14
52-week low $102.69$156.84$102.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGWREVRSKFORTY
P/E now vs peer median 103.2xmedian 21.9x 29.2xmedian 13.8x 2.9xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 2.3x 8.2xmedian 3.3x 0.6xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 65.4xmedian 16.4x 17.2xmedian 6.0x —median 9.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 37.1xmedian 17.4x 20.8xmedian 11.0x —median 13.1x
P/B now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 1.7x -21.7xmedian 1.3x 1.1xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.18median 0.91 1.17median 0.95 0.03median 1.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGWREVRSKFORTY
Revenue $1.48B $3.14B $2.93B
Gross profit $947.37M $2.20B $580.29M
Operating income $149.87M $1.38B $249.80M
Net income $139.28M $885.50M $697.91M
Free cash flow $377.66M $1.24B –
R&D $340.10M – $21.15M
EPS (diluted) $1.63 $6.77 $39.97
Cash & equivalents $372.89M $551.40M $863.79M
Total debt $678.09M $4.47B $168.15M
Shares (diluted) 85.41M 130.85M 15.79M
Enterprise value $10.64B $22.12B -$1.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGWREVRSKFORTY
P/E 103.2x 29.2x 2.9x
P/FCF 37.1x 20.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 35.9x 17.1x –
P/S 9.5x 8.2x 0.6x
P/B 11.7x -21.7x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 11.9x -17.1x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 65.4x 17.2x –
EV/EBIT 92.9x 21.6x 4.5x
EV/Revenue 9.4x 9.5x 0.4x
EV/FCF 36.9x 24.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 35.7x 19.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.18 1.17 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGWREVRSKFORTY
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.7% 5.0% 24.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.7% 6.9% 3.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.0% 6.2% 22.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.4% 8.3% -3.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 264.9% 4.8% 26.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 44.3% 6.6% 1.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 99.5% -3.3% 255.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 48.1% 20.7% 61.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 100.7% 3.7% 700.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 47.3% 25.0% 112.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.5% 21.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 116.5% 11.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 28.0% 21.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 126.3% 14.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGWREVRSKFORTY
Gross margin 64.2% 70.2% 19.8%
EBITDA margin 14.4% 55.0% –
Operating margin 10.2% 43.9% 8.5%
Pretax margin 11.1% 37.0% 7.1%
Net margin 9.4% 28.2% 21.6%
FCF margin 25.6% 39.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 26.4% 47.9% –
Return on equity 11.1% – 40.1%
Return on assets 5.4% 19.5% 19.5%
Return on invested capital 6.6% 31.9% 10.1%
Return on capital employed 7.9% 40.1% 11.2%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.8x 1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 12.3% 1.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGWREVRSKFORTY
Debt / assets 26.3% 99.5% 4.8%
Debt / equity 0.6x -3.8x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 2.3x –
Debt / FCF 1.8x 3.6x –
Liabilities / assets 53.7% 126.4% 52.8%
Equity / assets 46.3% -26.4% 47.2%
Interest coverage 11.2x 7.0x –
Current ratio 1.8x 1.0x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.9x 1.4x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.5x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 6.52 6.96 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGWREVRSKFORTY
Dividend yield – 1.0% 12.7%
Net buyback yield 3.1% 7.3% –
Shareholder yield 3.1% 8.2% 12.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGWREVRSKFORTY
Forward P/E 41.6xFY2027 24.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.10FY2027 $7.97FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +19.5%FY2027 +11.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +34.9% +5.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.61BFY2027 $3.33BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +8.5%FY2027 +8.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +30.2% +6.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGWREVRSKFORTY
Held by institutions 99.3% 97.6% –
Institutions holding 548 955 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.0% -0.4% –
Institutions buying 249 489 –
Institutions selling 227 349 –
Buyers to sellers 1.10 1.40 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GWREVRSKFORTY
GWRE 1.00 0.53 0.10
VRSK 0.53 1.00 0.06
FORTY 0.10 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GWRE, VRSK and FORTY?

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Guidewire Software (GWRE) $14.07B, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) $27.48B, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) $1.69B.

Which stock is cheaper, GWRE, VRSK and FORTY?

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Guidewire Software (GWRE) 101.0x, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 31.0x, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 2.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) is cheapest (Guidewire Software (GWRE) 41.6x, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 24.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Guidewire Software (GWRE) +22.7%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) +5.0%, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) +24.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) has the highest net margin (Guidewire Software (GWRE) 9.4%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 28.2%, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 21.6%). On return on invested capital, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) leads (Guidewire Software (GWRE) 6.6%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 31.9%, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Verisk Analytics (VRSK) returned the most: Guidewire Software (GWRE) -23.4%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -10.1%, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) -14.9%. Over five years, Guidewire Software (GWRE) compounded fastest (Guidewire Software (GWRE) +6.3%/yr, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -1.6%/yr, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) +1.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) has been the steadiest (Guidewire Software (GWRE) 62.9%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 35.7%, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 55.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GWRE, VRSK and FORTY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.