GVH vs HMR vs GXO Stock Comparison

Globavend Holdings, Heidmar Maritime Holdings and GXO Logistics Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GXO GXO Logistics, Inc.
$56.92 +23.7% 1M +2.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.40B
P/E
47.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.84B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

GXO Logistics leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (GXO Logistics 3, Heidmar Maritime Holdings 3, Globavend Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGVHHMRGXOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.78M $75.15M $6.40B GXO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -6.3x 47.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.4x 7.9x 18.4x GVH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +187.3% +7.1% HMR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -14.5% 1.0% GXO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 3.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 3.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -80.2% +11.8% +2.8% HMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -9.5%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 197.1% 93.1% 41.7% GXO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 42/100 37/100 HMR

Percentile Scorecard

GVHHMRGXO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGVHHMRGXO
Valuation – 12 #121 of 137 33 #92 of 137
Growth – 92 #11 of 127 57 #55 of 127
Profitability – 23 #97 of 125 29 #89 of 125
Financial Health 97 #6 of 147 – 19 #119 of 147
Shareholder Returns – – 48 #46 of 88
Overall – 42 37
  • GVH ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • HMR ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • GXO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGVHHMRGXOSPY
1 month -14.4%-17.4%+23.7% -1.0%
3 months +8.0%+20.3%+19.3% -0.4%
6 months -81.0%+65.1%+14.0% +4.5%
Year to date -34.0%+81.3%+8.1% +12.4%
1 year -80.2%+11.8%+2.8% +13.6%
3 years ——+6.0% +76.4%
3 years, per year ——+2.0% +20.8%
5 years ——-39.1% +63.7%
5 years, per year ——-9.5% +10.4%

Risk

MeasureGVHHMRGXOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 197.1%93.1%41.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 229.1%85.9%44.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.360.991.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.410.130.07 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.8%-87.1%-69.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -84.1%-25.7%-13.2% -1.6%
52-week high $5.98$1.91$65.59 $779.14
52-week low $0.78$0.77$44.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGVHHMRGXO
P/E now vs peer median —median 14.5x -7.0xmedian 14.5x 47.7xmedian 14.5x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.0x 1.0xmedian 1.0x 0.5xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.2x -33.4xmedian 8.2x 11.5xmedian 8.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 12.9x —median 12.9x 37.0xmedian 12.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 5.0xmedian 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 —median 0.64 -4.30median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGVHHMRGXO
Revenue – $82.01M $13.84B
Gross profit – $79.44M $2.07B
Operating income – -$1.70M $306.00M
Net income – -$12.72M $144.00M
Free cash flow – – $174.00M
EPS (diluted) – $-0.20 $1.19
Cash & equivalents $7.15M $28.70M $340.00M
Total debt – – $2.82B
Shares (diluted) 14.56M 58.26M 114.64M
Enterprise value -$3.09M -$11.03M $3.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGVHHMRGXO
P/E – -7.0x 47.7x
P/FCF – – 37.0x
P/Operating cash flow – – 14.9x
P/S – 1.0x 0.5x
P/B 1.4x 5.0x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 5.0x 2.9x
EV/EBITDA – -33.4x 11.5x
EV/EBIT – -32.0x 29.1x
EV/Revenue – 0.7x 0.6x
EV/FCF – – 51.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 20.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -4.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGVHHMRGXO
Revenue growth (1Y) – 187.3% 7.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 12.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 258.2% 5.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 5.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 47.5% 21.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 0.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 38.5% 56.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -11.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 43.6% 53.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -11.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -3.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -8.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 126.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -12.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGVHHMRGXO
Gross margin – 96.9% 15.0%
EBITDA margin – -2.0% 5.6%
Operating margin – -2.1% 2.2%
Pretax margin – 0.0% 1.5%
Net margin – -14.5% 1.0%
FCF margin – – 1.3%
Operating cash flow margin – – 3.1%
Return on equity – -82.6% 4.6%
Return on assets – -14.5% 1.1%
Return on invested capital – – 3.5%
Return on capital employed – – 3.6%
Asset turnover – 0.9x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 3.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGVHHMRGXO
Debt / assets – – 23.2%
Debt / equity – – 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 3.2x
Debt / FCF – – 16.2x
Liabilities / assets 8.9% 83.3% 75.1%
Equity / assets 91.1% 16.7% 24.9%
Interest coverage – – 2.3x
Current ratio 9.9x – 0.8x
Quick ratio 9.0x – 0.7x
Cash ratio 7.1x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – 1.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGVHHMRGXO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 1.5%
Shareholder yield – – 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGVHHMRGXO
Forward P/E 1.4xFY2026 7.9xFY2026 18.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.69FY2026 $0.18FY2026 $3.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -57.1%FY2026 – +23.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +5.6% +9.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $22.73MFY2026 $91.14MFY2026 $13.03BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.5%FY2026 +63.2%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +0.4% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGVHHMRGXO
Held by institutions – – 100.0%
Institutions holding – – 482
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +5.8%
Institutions buying – – 237
Institutions selling – – 153
Buyers to sellers – – 1.55

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GVHHMRGXO
GVH 1.00 0.01 0.07
HMR 0.01 1.00 0.12
GXO 0.07 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GVH, HMR and GXO?

GXO Logistics (GXO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Globavend Holdings (GVH) $14.78M, Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) $75.15M, GXO Logistics (GXO) $6.40B.

Which company is growing faster?

Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) +187.3%, GXO Logistics (GXO) +7.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

GXO Logistics (GXO) has the highest net margin (Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) -14.5%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) returned the most: Globavend Holdings (GVH) -80.2%, Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) +11.8%, GXO Logistics (GXO) +2.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, GXO Logistics (GXO) has been the steadiest (Globavend Holdings (GVH) 197.1%, Heidmar Maritime Holdings (HMR) 93.1%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 41.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GVH, HMR and GXO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, GXO Logistics (GXO) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.