GTX vs MGA vs MMM Stock Comparison

Garrett Motion, Magna International and 3M Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.
$22.33 -13.7% 1M +28.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.27B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.75B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins
MGA Magna International Inc
$64.00 -1.0% 1M +40.6% 1Y
Market cap
$18.31B
P/E
7.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.92B
Div. yield
–
Auto Parts Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
MMM 3M Co
$172.82 +2.0% 1M +3.6% 1Y
Market cap
$91.40B
P/E
25.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

3M leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (3M 4, Garrett Motion 4, Magna International 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGTXMGAMMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.27B $18.31B $91.40B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.0x 7.7x 25.8x MGA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.3x 9.5x 19.5x MGA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.5% -54.1% +1.7% GTX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.5% 7.5% 14.0% MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 64.2% — 22.0% GTX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.9x — 1.6x MMM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.1% +40.6% +3.6% MGA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +27.1%/yr -4.7%/yr +3.0%/yr GTX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.3% 37.0% 25.6% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 63/100 50/100 GTX

Percentile Scorecard

GTXMGAMMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGTXMGAMMM
Valuation 97 #8 of 203 92 #5 of 50 38 #126 of 203
Growth 47 #101 of 188 25 #37 of 49 59 #77 of 188
Profitability 76 #45 of 184 76 #12 of 47 87 #24 of 184
Financial Health 16 #183 of 217 – 19 #177 of 217
Shareholder Returns 91 #15 of 153 60 #13 of 31 47 #82 of 153
Overall 65 63 50
  • GTX ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MGA ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGTXMGAMMMSPY
1 month -13.7%-1.0%+2.0% +0.9%
3 months -22.4%-7.4%-2.9% +5.9%
6 months +9.0%+3.6%+20.1% +8.5%
Year to date +28.1%+20.1%+7.9% +13.3%
1 year +28.1%+40.6%+3.6% +12.4%
3 years +213.6%+34.3%+136.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year +46.4%+10.3%+33.2% +23.5%
5 years +231.3%-21.3%+15.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year +27.1%-4.7%+3.0% +11.0%
10 years —+57.5%+24.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+4.6%+2.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGTXMGAMMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.3%37.0%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%30.8%24.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.661.260.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.641.100.14 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.5%-65.5%-53.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.4%-12.4%-6.0% -0.9%
52-week high $36.23$73.05$183.81 $779.14
52-week low $15.64$44.65$141.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGTXMGAMMM
P/E now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 25.4x 7.6xmedian 20.0x 25.4xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.9x 0.6xmedian 0.5x 3.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.3xmedian 14.3x —median 8.7x 16.1xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.4xmedian 21.8x 2.7xmedian 9.4x 33.4xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median -6.2xmedian 2.2x —median 0.9x 21.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.10median 1.41 1.30median 1.35 0.71median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGTXMGAMMM
Revenue $3.75B $31.92B $25.25B
Gross profit $779.00M -$4.47B $9.98B
Operating income $536.00M -$5.31B $4.74B
Net income $357.00M $814.00M $3.58B
Free cash flow $365.00M $6.59B $2.68B
R&D – – $1.21B
EPS (diluted) $1.87 $8.42 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $158.00M $1.43B $4.84B
Total debt $1.37B $20.90B $15.00B
Shares (diluted) 190.59M 282.50M 522.60M
Enterprise value $3.57B $12.33B $72.85B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGTXMGAMMM
P/E 11.7x 7.6x 25.4x
P/FCF 11.4x 2.7x 33.4x
P/Operating cash flow 9.4x 4.0x 24.6x
P/S 1.1x 0.6x 3.5x
P/B -6.2x – 21.4x
P/Tangible book -6.2x – 42.2x
EV/EBITDA 8.3x – 16.1x
EV/EBIT 10.0x -4.0x 20.9x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 0.7x 3.9x
EV/FCF 14.7x 3.2x 37.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.2x 4.7x 27.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.10 1.30 0.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGTXMGAMMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.5% -54.1% 1.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.6% -7.6% 10.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.0% -113.3% -1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.2% -42.5% 17.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.8% -116.1% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.2% -55.8% 33.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 18.6% -36.9% 4.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.1% -5.9% 35.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.7% -5.6% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 120.7% 5.8% 35.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 7.3% 35.4% 42.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.9% 25.9% -18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 10.9% 1.3% 68.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.5% 8.0% -18.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGTXMGAMMM
Gross margin 20.8% -14.0% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 17.2% – 24.4%
Operating margin 14.3% -16.6% 18.8%
Pretax margin 12.0% 4.0% 17.5%
Net margin 9.5% 7.5% 14.0%
FCF margin 9.7% 20.7% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 11.8% 14.2% 14.4%
Return on equity – – 101.3%
Return on assets 14.7% – 9.8%
Return on invested capital 64.2% – 22.0%
Return on capital employed 56.1% – 18.7%
Asset turnover 1.5x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 5.6x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGTXMGAMMM
Debt / assets 55.3% – 37.9%
Debt / equity -2.0x – 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x – 1.6x
Debt / FCF 3.7x 0.7x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 127.3% – 89.5%
Equity / assets -27.3% – 10.5%
Interest coverage 5.1x – –
Current ratio 1.0x – 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x – 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.34 – 4.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGTXMGAMMM
Dividend yield 1.4% 3.0% 1.8%
Net buyback yield 6.5% 0.1% 3.1%
Shareholder yield 7.9% 3.1% 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 44.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 59.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -21.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGTXMGAMMM
Forward P/E 12.3xFY2026 9.5xFY2026 19.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.82FY2026 $6.73FY2026 $8.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.0%FY2026 +18.3%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.2% +11.9% +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.58BFY2026 $39.77BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.2% +13.2% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGTXMGAMMM
Held by institutions 96.8% 63.5% 74.5%
Institutions holding 458 450 2,210
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% -2.2% +0.8%
Institutions buying 239 207 916
Institutions selling 139 168 837
Buyers to sellers 1.72 1.23 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GTXMGAMMM
GTX 1.00 0.45 0.30
MGA 0.45 1.00 0.33
MMM 0.30 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GTX, MGA and MMM?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Garrett Motion (GTX) $4.27B, Magna International (MGA) $18.31B, 3M (MMM) $91.40B.

Which stock is cheaper, GTX, MGA and MMM?

Magna International (MGA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Garrett Motion (GTX) 12.0x, Magna International (MGA) 7.7x, 3M (MMM) 25.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Magna International (MGA) is cheapest (Garrett Motion (GTX) 12.3x, Magna International (MGA) 9.5x, 3M (MMM) 19.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Garrett Motion (GTX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Garrett Motion (GTX) +8.5%, Magna International (MGA) -54.1%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (Garrett Motion (GTX) 9.5%, Magna International (MGA) 7.5%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%). On return on invested capital, Garrett Motion (GTX) leads (Garrett Motion (GTX) 64.2%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Magna International (MGA) returned the most: Garrett Motion (GTX) +28.1%, Magna International (MGA) +40.6%, 3M (MMM) +3.6%. Over five years, Garrett Motion (GTX) compounded fastest (Garrett Motion (GTX) +27.1%/yr, Magna International (MGA) -4.7%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Garrett Motion (GTX) 0.00%, Magna International (MGA) 0.00%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%. Garrett Motion (GTX) and Magna International (MGA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (Garrett Motion (GTX) 44.3%, Magna International (MGA) 37.0%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GTX, MGA and MMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.