GTX vs MGA vs FTV Stock Comparison

Garrett Motion, Magna International and Fortive Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.
$22.33 -13.7% 1M +28.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.17B
P/E
11.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.75B
Div. yield
1.43%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins
MGA Magna International Inc
$64.00 -1.0% 1M +40.6% 1Y
Market cap
$17.94B
P/E
7.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.92B
Div. yield
3.05%
Auto Parts Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
FTV Fortive Corp
$64.13 +15.0% 1M +30.5% 1Y
Market cap
$19.12B
P/E
29.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.40B
Div. yield
0.39%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Garrett Motion leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Garrett Motion 5, Magna International 4, Fortive 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGTXMGAFTVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.17B $17.94B $19.12B FTV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.7x 7.6x 29.6x MGA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.3x 9.5x 20.0x MGA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.5% -54.1% +7.0% GTX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.5% 7.5% 14.8% FTV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 64.2% — 8.1% GTX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.9x — 2.4x GTX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.43% 3.05% 0.39% MGA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.1% +40.6% +30.5% MGA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +27.1%/yr -4.7%/yr -3.3%/yr GTX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.3% 37.0% 27.0% FTV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 63/100 49/100 GTX

Percentile Scorecard

GTXMGAFTV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGTXMGAFTV
Valuation 97 #8 of 203 92 #5 of 50 49 #105 of 203
Growth 47 #101 of 188 25 #37 of 49 25 #141 of 188
Profitability 76 #45 of 184 76 #12 of 47 75 #46 of 184
Financial Health 16 #183 of 217 – 38 #135 of 217
Shareholder Returns 91 #15 of 153 60 #13 of 31 58 #65 of 153
Overall 65 63 49
  • GTX ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MGA ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGTXMGAFTVSPY
1 month -13.7%-1.0%+15.0% +0.9%
3 months -22.4%-7.4%+7.7% +5.9%
6 months +9.0%+3.6%+3.9% +8.5%
Year to date +28.1%+20.1%+16.2% +13.3%
1 year +28.1%+40.6%+30.5% +12.4%
3 years +213.6%+34.3%-1.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year +46.4%+10.3%-0.5% +23.5%
5 years +231.3%-21.3%-15.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year +27.1%-4.7%-3.3% +11.0%
10 years —+57.5%+27.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+4.6%+2.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGTXMGAFTVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.3%37.0%27.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%30.8%26.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.661.260.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.641.101.13 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.5%-65.5%-46.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.4%-12.4%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $36.23$73.05$64.16 $779.14
52-week low $15.64$44.65$49.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGTXMGAFTV
P/E now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 25.4x 7.6xmedian 20.0x 29.6xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.9x 0.6xmedian 0.5x 4.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.3xmedian 14.3x —median 8.7x 16.9xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.4xmedian 21.8x 2.7xmedian 9.4x 17.6xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median -6.2xmedian 2.2x —median 0.9x 3.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.10median 1.41 1.30median 1.35 -11.18median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGTXMGAFTV
Revenue $3.75B $31.92B $4.40B
Gross profit $779.00M -$4.47B $2.79B
Operating income $536.00M -$5.31B $863.00M
Net income $357.00M $814.00M $651.90M
Free cash flow $365.00M $6.59B $1.09B
R&D – – $268.20M
EPS (diluted) $1.87 $8.42 $2.15
Cash & equivalents $158.00M $1.43B $377.30M
Total debt $1.37B $20.90B $3.51B
Shares (diluted) 190.59M 282.50M 303.90M
Enterprise value $3.46B $12.30B $17.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGTXMGAFTV
P/E 11.7x 7.6x 29.6x
P/FCF 11.4x 2.7x 17.6x
P/Operating cash flow 9.4x 4.0x 15.9x
P/S 1.1x 0.6x 4.3x
P/B -6.2x – 3.2x
P/Tangible book -6.2x – 4.7x
EV/EBITDA 8.3x – 16.9x
EV/EBIT 10.0x -4.0x 25.8x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 0.7x 5.1x
EV/FCF 14.7x 3.2x 20.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.2x 4.7x 18.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.10 1.30 -11.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGTXMGAFTV
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.5% -54.1% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.6% -7.6% -9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.0% -113.3% 6.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.2% -42.5% -7.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.8% -116.1% 22.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.2% -55.8% -8.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 18.6% -36.9% 8.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.1% -5.9% -7.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.7% -5.6% 18.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 120.7% 5.8% -2.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 7.3% 35.4% -1.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.9% 25.9% -4.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 10.9% 1.3% -3.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.5% 8.0% -4.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGTXMGAFTV
Gross margin 20.8% -14.0% 63.5%
EBITDA margin 17.2% – 29.9%
Operating margin 14.3% -16.6% 19.6%
Pretax margin 12.0% 4.0% 16.8%
Net margin 9.5% 7.5% 14.8%
FCF margin 9.7% 20.7% 24.7%
Operating cash flow margin 11.8% 14.2% 27.3%
Return on equity – – 10.8%
Return on assets 14.7% – 5.6%
Return on invested capital 64.2% – 8.1%
Return on capital employed 56.1% – 8.4%
Asset turnover 1.5x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 5.6x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGTXMGAFTV
Debt / assets 55.3% – 30.6%
Debt / equity -2.0x – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x – 2.4x
Debt / FCF 3.7x 0.7x 3.2x
Liabilities / assets 127.3% – 48.2%
Equity / assets -27.3% – 51.8%
Interest coverage 5.1x – 4.9x
Current ratio 1.0x – 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.7x – 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 0.3x
Altman Z-score 2.34 – 3.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGTXMGAFTV
Dividend yield 1.4% 3.0% 0.4%
Net buyback yield 6.5% 0.1% 6.7%
Shareholder yield 7.9% 3.1% 7.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 11.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 7.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -24.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -8.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGTXMGAFTV
Forward P/E 12.3xFY2026 9.5xFY2026 20.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.82FY2026 $6.73FY2026 $3.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.0%FY2026 +18.3%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.2% +11.9% -3.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.58BFY2026 $39.77BFY2026 $4.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.2% +13.2% -6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGTXMGAFTV
Held by institutions 96.8% 63.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding 458 450 803
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% -2.2% +2.8%
Institutions buying 239 207 350
Institutions selling 139 168 301
Buyers to sellers 1.72 1.23 1.16

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GTXMGAFTV
GTX 1.00 0.45 0.07
MGA 0.45 1.00 0.28
FTV 0.07 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GTX, MGA and FTV?

Fortive (FTV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Garrett Motion (GTX) $4.17B, Magna International (MGA) $17.94B, Fortive (FTV) $19.12B.

Which stock is cheaper, GTX, MGA and FTV?

Magna International (MGA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Garrett Motion (GTX) 11.7x, Magna International (MGA) 7.6x, Fortive (FTV) 29.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Magna International (MGA) is cheapest (Garrett Motion (GTX) 12.3x, Magna International (MGA) 9.5x, Fortive (FTV) 20.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Garrett Motion (GTX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Garrett Motion (GTX) +8.5%, Magna International (MGA) -54.1%, Fortive (FTV) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortive (FTV) has the highest net margin (Garrett Motion (GTX) 9.5%, Magna International (MGA) 7.5%, Fortive (FTV) 14.8%). On return on invested capital, Garrett Motion (GTX) leads (Garrett Motion (GTX) 64.2%, Fortive (FTV) 8.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Magna International (MGA) returned the most: Garrett Motion (GTX) +28.1%, Magna International (MGA) +40.6%, Fortive (FTV) +30.5%. Over five years, Garrett Motion (GTX) compounded fastest (Garrett Motion (GTX) +27.1%/yr, Magna International (MGA) -4.7%/yr, Fortive (FTV) -3.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Magna International (MGA) has the highest dividend yield: Garrett Motion (GTX) 1.43%, Magna International (MGA) 3.05%, Fortive (FTV) 0.39%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortive (FTV) has been the steadiest (Garrett Motion (GTX) 44.3%, Magna International (MGA) 37.0%, Fortive (FTV) 27.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GTX, MGA and FTV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Garrett Motion (GTX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.