GTN vs MANU vs TV Stock Comparison

Gray Media, Manchester United and Grupo Televisa, S.A.B Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GTN Gray Media, Inc
$4.30 -6.3% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$435.61M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.15B
Div. yield
0.08%
Television Broadcasting Communication Services
3 wins
MANU Manchester United plc
$20.78 +1.5% 1M +16.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.61B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$909.31M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
TV Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.
$2.17 -7.7% 1M -21.1% 1Y
Market cap
$134.48B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.23B
Div. yield
–
Broadband and Cable Communication Services
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Manchester United leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Manchester United 5, Gray Media 3, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGTNMANUTVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $435.61M $3.61B $134.48B TV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.5x -62.3x -272.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.8x — 12.1x GTN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -11.3% +5.5% +5.5% MANU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.8% -6.4% -15.3% GTN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.3% 2.6% 2.9% TV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 7.2x 2.4x 64.6x MANU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.4% +16.2% -21.1% MANU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -28.8%/yr +5.0%/yr -26.5%/yr MANU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.1% 33.5% 38.2% MANU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 46/100 33/100 GTN

Percentile Scorecard

GTNMANUTV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGTNMANUTV
Valuation 89 #7 of 53 30 #31 of 44 4 #47 of 49
Growth 9 #40 of 44 76 #11 of 43 21 #36 of 45
Profitability 49 #22 of 42 51 #21 of 42 34 #30 of 45
Financial Health 33 #41 of 61 26 #35 of 47 75 #13 of 49
Shareholder Returns 80 #6 of 26 – –
Overall 52 46 33
  • GTN ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • MANU ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • TV ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGTNMANUTVSPY
1 month -6.3%+1.5%-7.7% +0.9%
3 months +0.9%-11.1%-23.3% +5.9%
6 months -22.2%+18.7%-23.9% +8.5%
Year to date -11.2%+30.5%-25.4% +13.3%
1 year -4.4%+16.2%-21.1% +12.4%
3 years -29.2%+17.5%-7.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year -10.9%+5.5%-2.6% +23.5%
5 years -81.7%+27.6%-78.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year -28.8%+5.0%-26.5% +11.0%
10 years -52.7%+36.3%-91.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year -7.2%+3.1%-21.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGTNMANUTVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.1%33.5%38.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.5%32.0%40.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.970.680.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.070.48-0.55 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.2%-54.5%-86.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.6%-14.1%-36.9% -0.9%
52-week high $6.20$24.19$3.44 $779.14
52-week low $3.58$15.20$2.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGTNMANUTV
P/E now vs peer median -7.3xmedian 18.7x -61.9xmedian 16.8x -275.8xmedian 11.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.6x 4.0xmedian 1.9x 41.8xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 10.6x 13.0xmedian 10.2x 3,856xmedian 6.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 8.9x 9.9xmedian 11.2x —median 6.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.6x 18.2xmedian 2.2x 21.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.23median 0.49 3.66median 0.44 8.97median 0.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGTNMANUTV
Revenue $3.15B $909.31M $3.23B
Gross profit $820.00M -$21.12M $1.78B
Operating income $435.00M $30.28M $307.39M
Net income -$26.00M -$57.81M -$116.03M
Free cash flow $146.00M $363.93M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.58 $-0.34 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $176.00M $89.13M $1.70B
Total debt $5.81B $3.96B $14.34B
Shares (diluted) 100.00M 172.43M 68.12B
Enterprise value -$549.39M $3.27B $126.22B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGTNMANUTV
P/E -7.3x -61.9x -275.8x
P/FCF 3.4x 9.9x –
P/Operating cash flow 2.0x 14.3x –
P/S 0.2x 4.0x 41.8x
P/B 0.2x 18.2x 21.1x
P/Tangible book -0.1x 18.2x 27.1x
EV/EBITDA 7.8x 13.0x 3,856x
EV/EBIT 14.1x 146.8x 446.7x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 4.9x 42.6x
EV/FCF 42.0x 12.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 24.5x 17.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.23 3.66 8.97

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGTNMANUTV
Revenue growth (1Y) -11.3% 5.5% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.3% 5.2% -11.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -28.8% 24.6% -37.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -13.5% – -18.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -41.9% 223.3% 255.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -18.2% 62.2% 5.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -113.0% -36.0% 68.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.0% -19.1% -27.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -138.0% -35.3% -18.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -31.1% -16.9% -30.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -69.8% 128.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -36.1% 22.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -79.4% 141.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.2% 34.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGTNMANUTV
Gross margin 26.0% -2.3% 55.2%
EBITDA margin 24.9% 37.6% 1.1%
Operating margin 13.8% 3.3% 9.5%
Pretax margin -2.0% -7.0% 8.3%
Net margin -1.8% -6.4% -15.3%
FCF margin 4.6% 40.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 7.9% 27.8% –
Return on equity -1.2% -26.5% -1.9%
Return on assets -0.3% -2.8% -0.9%
Return on invested capital 2.3% 2.6% 2.9%
Return on capital employed 4.4% 2.5% 2.7%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -9.6x -4.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGTNMANUTV
Debt / assets 55.6% 44.5% 34.8%
Debt / equity 2.7x 4.6x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 7.2x 2.4x 64.6x
Debt / FCF 39.8x 2.5x –
Liabilities / assets 79.6% 90.3% 52.7%
Equity / assets 20.4% 9.7% 47.3%
Interest coverage 0.9x 0.5x 0.7x
Current ratio 1.0x 0.3x 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.2x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 1.5x
Altman Z-score 0.63 0.97 12.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGTNMANUTV
Dividend yield 7.4% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 7.4% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) -130.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGTNMANUTV
Forward P/E 1.8xFY2026 – 12.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.43FY2026 $-0.18FY2027 $0.18FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -130.0% – +38.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.39BFY2026 $1.07BFY2027 $3.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.5%FY2026 +19.6%FY2027 -9.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.3% -6.0% -4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGTNMANUTV
Held by institutions 80.6% 17.1% 0.2%
Institutions holding 176 125 106
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.7% +5.0% -4.9%
Institutions buying 72 63 44
Institutions selling 70 30 33
Buyers to sellers 1.03 2.10 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GTNMANUTV
GTN 1.00 0.15 0.18
MANU 0.15 1.00 0.10
TV 0.18 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GTN, MANU and TV?

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gray Media (GTN) $435.61M, Manchester United (MANU) $3.61B, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) $134.48B.

Which company is growing faster?

Manchester United (MANU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gray Media (GTN) -11.3%, Manchester United (MANU) +5.5%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gray Media (GTN) has the highest net margin (Gray Media (GTN) -1.8%, Manchester United (MANU) -6.4%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -15.3%). On return on invested capital, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) leads (Gray Media (GTN) 2.3%, Manchester United (MANU) 2.6%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 2.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Manchester United (MANU) returned the most: Gray Media (GTN) -4.4%, Manchester United (MANU) +16.2%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -21.1%. Over five years, Manchester United (MANU) compounded fastest (Gray Media (GTN) -28.8%/yr, Manchester United (MANU) +5.0%/yr, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -26.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Gray Media (GTN) 0.08%, Manchester United (MANU) 0.00%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 0.00%. Manchester United (MANU) and Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Manchester United (MANU) has been the steadiest (Gray Media (GTN) 62.1%, Manchester United (MANU) 33.5%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 38.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GTN, MANU and TV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Manchester United (MANU) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.