GSM vs HBM vs TECK Stock Comparison

Ferroglobe, Hudbay Minerals and Teck Resources Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GSM Ferroglobe PLC
$4.01 +0.5% 1M -20.1% 1Y
Market cap
$749.31M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.37B
Div. yield
1.10%
Copper Basic Materials
2 wins
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.
$23.60 -12.2% 1M +46.0% 1Y
Market cap
$9.33B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.47B
Div. yield
0.13%
Copper Basic Materials
4 wins
TECK Teck Resources Ltd
$63.05 -3.2% 1M +45.9% 1Y
Market cap
$30.80B
P/E
17.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.13B
Div. yield
0.82%
Copper Basic Materials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Teck Resources leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Teck Resources 6, Hudbay Minerals 4, Ferroglobe 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGSMHBMTECKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $749.31M $9.33B $30.80B TECK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -18.7x 13.6x 17.2x HBM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.9x 13.5x TECK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -8.5% +12.1% +41.8% TECK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.0% 27.7% 17.8% HBM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.5% 12.6% 18.4% TECK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.8x 0.1x -0.5x GSM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.10% 0.13% 0.82% GSM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.1% +46.0% +45.9% HBM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.6%/yr +27.7%/yr +17.7%/yr HBM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.6% 62.6% 46.3% TECK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 70/100 73/100 TECK

Percentile Scorecard

GSMHBMTECK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGSMHBMTECK
Valuation 78 #37 of 162 82 #30 of 162 84 #27 of 162
Growth 17 #122 of 147 89 #17 of 147 71 #43 of 147
Profitability 39 #75 of 122 87 #17 of 122 73 #34 of 122
Financial Health 50 #82 of 164 49 #85 of 164 53 #77 of 164
Shareholder Returns 67 #36 of 107 42 #63 of 107 83 #19 of 107
Overall 50 70 73
  • GSM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • HBM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • TECK ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGSMHBMTECKSPY
1 month +0.5%-12.2%-3.2% +0.9%
3 months +26.9%+7.4%+9.7% +5.9%
6 months -10.7%+5.1%+12.1% +8.5%
Year to date -13.6%+18.9%+31.7% +13.3%
1 year -20.1%+46.0%+45.9% +12.4%
3 years -9.5%+438.8%+74.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year -3.3%+75.4%+20.4% +23.5%
5 years -39.5%+239.1%+126.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year -9.6%+27.7%+17.7% +11.0%
10 years -56.4%+475.6%+199.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year -8.0%+19.1%+11.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGSMHBMTECKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.6%62.6%46.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.9%67.5%45.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.362.762.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.340.740.99 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.2%-63.3%-47.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.4%-25.9%-12.4% -0.9%
52-week high $5.45$31.87$71.97 $779.14
52-week low $3.14$14.58$38.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGSMHBMTECK
P/E now vs peer median -18.7xmedian 13.4x 13.6xmedian 13.4x 17.2xmedian 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 3.2x 3.8xmedian 3.2x 3.0xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.3xmedian 7.3x 6.2xmedian 7.3x 5.2xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 51.4xmedian 14.8x 10.6xmedian 14.8x 13.1xmedian 14.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.3x 1.9xmedian 2.3x 1.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.60median 0.31 0.04median 0.31 -28.79median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGSMHBMTECK
Revenue $1.37B $2.47B $10.13B
Gross profit – $972.40M $3.65B
Operating income -$37.28M $1.10B $4.02B
Net income -$45.85M $680.00M $1.69B
Free cash flow $14.57M $880.20M $2.35B
R&D – $58.40M $60.80M
EPS (diluted) $-0.21 $1.72 $3.65
Cash & equivalents $93.08M $890.90M $4.26B
Total debt $372.14M $3.67B $2.55B
Shares (diluted) 188.36M 396.65M 495.40M
Enterprise value $265.55M $6.65B $13.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGSMHBMTECK
P/E -18.7x 13.6x 17.2x
P/FCF 51.4x 10.6x 13.1x
P/Operating cash flow 15.7x 10.6x –
P/S 0.5x 3.8x 3.0x
P/B 1.0x 1.9x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 1.9x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 16.3x 6.2x 5.2x
EV/EBIT -19.2x 8.6x 7.0x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 3.9x 2.8x
EV/FCF 49.2x 10.8x 12.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.0x 10.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.60 0.04 -28.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGSMHBMTECK
Revenue growth (1Y) -8.5% 12.1% 41.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.4% 24.6% -2.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 32.8% 151.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 71.9% -6.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.3% 89.3% 260.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -28.6% 126.5% 1.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 48.4% 139.9% 626.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.4% 410.6% 10.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 53.0% 122.6% 4,327%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -31.2% 346.8% -0.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -38.8% 1.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -47.3% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -62.7% 2,912% 11,938%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -62.9% 115.3% -23.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGSMHBMTECK
Gross margin – 39.4% 36.0%
EBITDA margin 3.2% 61.9% 53.4%
Operating margin -2.7% 44.7% 39.6%
Pretax margin -1.6% 47.3% 32.8%
Net margin -3.0% 27.7% 17.8%
FCF margin 1.1% 35.7% 23.2%
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% 35.6% –
Return on equity -6.6% 16.3% 8.9%
Return on assets -3.0% 43.1% 5.1%
Return on invested capital -4.5% 12.6% 18.4%
Return on capital employed -2.6% – 13.0%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.0x 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 3.3% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGSMHBMTECK
Debt / assets 3.9% 78.4% 7.5%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.8x 0.1x -0.5x
Debt / FCF 4.1x 1.3x 1.1x
Liabilities / assets 53.7% -231.7% 42.6%
Equity / assets 46.3% 331.7% 57.4%
Interest coverage -1.8x 14.9x 6.2x
Current ratio 5.9x – 3.1x
Quick ratio 3.1x – 2.4x
Cash ratio 0.7x – 1.8x
Altman Z-score – – 2.74

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGSMHBMTECK
Dividend yield 1.1% 0.1% 0.8%
Net buyback yield -0.6% -0.3% 3.0%
Shareholder yield 0.5% -0.2% 3.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 1.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 1.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -260.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -59.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGSMHBMTECK
Forward P/E – 15.9xFY2026 13.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.05FY2026 $1.48FY2026 $4.66FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +120.9%FY2026 +107.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +27.7% -14.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.43BFY2026 $3.05BFY2026 $10.56BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.6%FY2026 +37.8%FY2026 +34.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +32.0% +18.9% +11.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGSMHBMTECK
Held by institutions 55.9% 83.1% 69.3%
Institutions holding 174 319 521
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +10.9% +3.2%
Institutions buying 94 200 255
Institutions selling 58 82 169
Buyers to sellers 1.62 2.44 1.51

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GSMHBMTECK
GSM 1.00 0.33 0.33
HBM 0.33 1.00 0.78
TECK 0.33 0.78 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GSM, HBM and TECK?

Teck Resources (TECK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferroglobe (GSM) $749.31M, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) $9.33B, Teck Resources (TECK) $30.80B.

Which stock is cheaper, GSM, HBM and TECK?

Hudbay Minerals (HBM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferroglobe (GSM) -18.7x, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 13.6x, Teck Resources (TECK) 17.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Teck Resources (TECK) is cheapest (Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 15.9x, Teck Resources (TECK) 13.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teck Resources (TECK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ferroglobe (GSM) -8.5%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +12.1%, Teck Resources (TECK) +41.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hudbay Minerals (HBM) has the highest net margin (Ferroglobe (GSM) -3.0%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 27.7%, Teck Resources (TECK) 17.8%). On return on invested capital, Teck Resources (TECK) leads (Ferroglobe (GSM) -4.5%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 12.6%, Teck Resources (TECK) 18.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hudbay Minerals (HBM) returned the most: Ferroglobe (GSM) -20.1%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +46.0%, Teck Resources (TECK) +45.9%. Over five years, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) compounded fastest (Ferroglobe (GSM) -9.6%/yr, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +27.7%/yr, Teck Resources (TECK) +17.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ferroglobe (GSM) has the highest dividend yield: Ferroglobe (GSM) 1.10%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 0.13%, Teck Resources (TECK) 0.82%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Teck Resources (TECK) has been the steadiest (Ferroglobe (GSM) 58.6%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 62.6%, Teck Resources (TECK) 46.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GSM, HBM and TECK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Teck Resources (TECK) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.