GSAT vs TLK vs LUNR Stock Comparison

Globalstar, Perusahaan Perseroan Persero Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk and Intuitive Machines Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GSAT Globalstar, Inc.
$83.53 +1.1% 1M +101.1% 1Y
Market cap
$10.66B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$280.64M
Div. yield
–
Satellite Communications Communication Services
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Globalstar leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Globalstar 6, Perusahaan Perseroan Persero Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk 2, Intuitive Machines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGSATTLKLUNRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.66B $11.02B $1.73B TLK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -163.8x — -13.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.7% — +116.9% LUNR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -23.2% — -26.8% GSAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.8% — -560.6% GSAT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.6x — 0.3x GSAT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +101.1% -43.9% -2.8% GSAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +27.6%/yr -15.7%/yr — GSAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.8% 38.4% 110.2% TLK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 — 25/100 GSAT

Percentile Scorecard

GSATTLKLUNR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGSATTLKLUNR
Valuation 17 #41 of 49 – 24 #76 of 100
Growth 84 #8 of 45 – 27 #70 of 96
Profitability 36 #29 of 45 – 27 #70 of 95
Financial Health 67 #17 of 49 69 #16 of 49 23 #81 of 105
Shareholder Returns 25 #28 of 37 94 #3 of 37 –
Overall 46 – 25
  • GSAT ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • TLK ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • LUNR ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGSATTLKLUNRSPY
1 month +1.1%-15.1%-19.7% +0.7%
3 months +4.3%-23.0%-4.7% +3.7%
6 months +1.5%-33.7%-53.9% +7.1%
Year to date +36.8%-46.7%-28.0% +12.8%
1 year +101.1%-43.9%-2.8% +11.9%
3 years +306.5%-48.4%+294.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +59.6%-19.8%+58.1% +22.8%
5 years +237.5%-57.4%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +27.6%-15.7%— +10.9%
10 years +479.2%-65.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +19.2%-10.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGSATTLKLUNRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.8%38.4%110.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.0%44.3%101.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.450.603.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.81-1.14-0.03 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.7%-68.3%-97.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.1%-52.2%-74.4% -1.2%
52-week high $84.43$23.43$45.70 $779.14
52-week low $41.54$10.44$8.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGSATTLKLUNR
P/E now vs peer median -165.7xmedian 11.5x —median 11.5x -14.4xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 38.6xmedian 1.1x —median 1.1x 5.4xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 119.0xmedian 6.8x —median 6.8x -25.3xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.5xmedian 5.9x —median 5.9x -14.0xmedian 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 37.0xmedian 1.3x 0.0xmedian 1.3x -9.1xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median -4.76median 0.25 —median 0.25 0.35median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGSATTLKLUNR
Revenue $280.64M – $490.12M
Gross profit $174.69M – $83.23M
Operating income $13.18M – -$134.85M
Net income -$54.49M – -$184.98M
Free cash flow $480.22M – -$187.75M
R&D – – $14.69M
EPS (diluted) $-0.50 – $-0.81
Cash & equivalents $409.77M $54.58T $367.40M
Total debt $358.79M $135.75T $336.35M
Shares (diluted) 129.12M – 162.17M
Enterprise value $9.10B -$129.22T -$77.30M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGSATTLKLUNR
P/E -165.7x – -14.4x
P/FCF 22.5x – -14.0x
P/Operating cash flow 18.9x – -20.8x
P/S 38.6x – 5.4x
P/B 37.0x 0.0x -9.1x
P/Tangible book 73.7x 0.0x -4.5x
EV/EBITDA 119.0x – -25.3x
EV/EBIT 817.3x – -19.3x
EV/Revenue 38.4x – 5.3x
EV/FCF 22.4x – -13.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.8x – -20.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.76 – 0.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGSATTLKLUNR
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.7% – 116.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.4% – 78.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.2% – 22,840%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.6% – 250.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 365.7% – -104.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% – -65.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -41.9% – 37.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 36.5% – -267.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -31.5% – 60.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 34.8% – -41.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.8% – -540.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 88.0% – -220.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.1% – -366.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 253.1% – -75.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGSATTLKLUNR
Gross margin 62.2% – 17.0%
EBITDA margin 32.2% – -21.0%
Operating margin 4.7% – -27.5%
Pretax margin -16.3% – -36.9%
Net margin -23.2% – -26.8%
FCF margin 171.1% – -38.3%
Operating cash flow margin 203.7% – -25.8%
Return on equity -17.9% – –
Return on assets -2.3% – -10.3%
Return on invested capital 1.8% – -560.6%
Return on capital employed 0.6% – -9.6%
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -10.5x – 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 5.7% – 4.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGSATTLKLUNR
Debt / assets 14.7% 18.8% 17.8%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.4x -1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.6x – 0.3x
Debt / FCF 0.7x – -1.8x
Liabilities / assets 88.0% 55.5% 115.4%
Equity / assets 12.0% 44.5% -15.4%
Interest coverage – – -10.0x
Current ratio 1.5x 0.8x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.6x 1.3x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.6x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 1.97 – 0.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGSATTLKLUNR
Dividend yield – 11.0% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 11.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGSATTLKLUNR
Forward P/E – 10.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.60FY2026 $1.09FY2026 $-0.63FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +9.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +9.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $295.71MFY2026 $8.21BFY2026 $951.52MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.3%FY2026 +0.3%FY2026 +353.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.1% +11.7% +11.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGSATTLKLUNR
Held by institutions 25.9% 6.3% 63.2%
Institutions holding 315 209 328
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.0% +7.8% +34.5%
Institutions buying 185 101 223
Institutions selling 81 76 71
Buyers to sellers 2.28 1.33 3.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GSATTLKLUNR
GSAT 1.00 0.08 0.41
TLK 0.08 1.00 0.09
LUNR 0.41 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GSAT, TLK and LUNR?

Perusahaan Perseroan Persero Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Globalstar (GSAT) $10.66B, Perusahaan Perseroan Persero Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) $11.02B, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) $1.73B.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Machines (LUNR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Globalstar (GSAT) +7.7%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) +116.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Globalstar (GSAT) has the highest net margin (Globalstar (GSAT) -23.2%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -26.8%). On return on invested capital, Globalstar (GSAT) leads (Globalstar (GSAT) 1.8%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -560.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Globalstar (GSAT) returned the most: Globalstar (GSAT) +101.1%, Perusahaan Perseroan Persero Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) -43.9%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -2.8%. Over five years, Globalstar (GSAT) compounded fastest (Globalstar (GSAT) +27.6%/yr, Perusahaan Perseroan Persero Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) -15.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Perusahaan Perseroan Persero Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) has been the steadiest (Globalstar (GSAT) 55.8%, Perusahaan Perseroan Persero Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (TLK) 38.4%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) 110.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GSAT, TLK and LUNR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Globalstar (GSAT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.