GS vs SMFG vs WFC Stock Comparison

Goldman Sachs, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$912.08 -2.5% 1M +15.5% 1Y
Market cap
$265.82B
P/E
12.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
1.97%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$82.68 -0.3% 1M -5.0% 1Y
Market cap
$250.40B
P/E
12.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
2.24%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Wells Fargo & Company leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Wells Fargo & Company 4, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial 3, Goldman Sachs 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGSSMFGWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $265.82B $92.82B $250.40B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.8x -2.1x 12.4x WFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.1x 14.5x 10.6x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.7% +34.8% +5.4% SMFG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -42.5% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -0.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.97% 1.20% 2.24% WFC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.5% +51.1% -5.0% SMFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.1%/yr +29.9%/yr +10.0%/yr SMFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.9% 29.2% 25.5% WFC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 22/100 40/100 GS

Percentile Scorecard

GSSMFGWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGSSMFGWFC
Valuation 18 #294 of 360 44 #201 of 360 63 #135 of 360
Growth 96 #8 of 191 33 #128 of 191 22 #149 of 191
Profitability – 18 #138 of 168 –
Financial Health – 5 #167 of 175 –
Shareholder Returns 27 #251 of 341 12 #300 of 341 35 #222 of 341
Overall 47 22 40
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • SMFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGSSMFGWFCSPY
1 month -2.5%-8.8%-0.3% -0.2%
3 months -11.7%-5.2%-4.9% +3.9%
6 months -1.6%+15.8%+1.4% +8.2%
Year to date +3.8%+25.5%-11.3% +12.9%
1 year +15.5%+51.1%-5.0% +12.3%
3 years +214.6%+152.3%+113.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +46.6%+36.2%+28.8% +23.3%
5 years +119.9%+270.2%+61.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +17.1%+29.9%+10.0% +10.9%
10 years +413.1%+257.7%+78.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +17.8%+13.6%+5.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGSSMFGWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.9%29.2%25.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.2%28.2%29.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.631.110.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.481.75-0.19 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.0%-30.0%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.8%-12.0%-14.2% -1.2%
52-week high $1,152.07$27.55$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $773.70$16.05$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGSSMFGWFC
P/E now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 12.1x -2.1xmedian 12.1x 12.4xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 3.4x 0.9xmedian 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x —median 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.4xmedian 10.9x —median 10.9x 12.7xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.26median 1.34 0.08median 1.34 1.10median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGSSMFGWFC
Revenue $69.70B $103.68B $87.23B
Gross profit – $67.73B –
Operating income – -$30.78B –
Net income – $11.49B –
EPS (diluted) $69.89 $-11.47 $6.62
Cash & equivalents $177.00B – –
Total debt – $397.48B –
Shares (diluted) 304.90M 3.84B 3.07B
Enterprise value $265.82B -$1.26T $252.51B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGSSMFGWFC
P/E 12.8x -2.1x 12.4x
P/FCF -6.4x – 12.7x
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S 3.8x 0.9x 2.9x
P/B 2.1x 1.3x –
P/Tangible book 2.1x 1.3x –
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – -36.3x –
EV/Revenue 3.8x 0.8x 2.9x
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.26 0.08 1.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGSSMFGWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.7% 34.8% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.3% 14.6% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 12.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -32.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -75.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 823.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 4.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 39.0% 15.9% 6.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 49.3% -25.7% 11.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGSSMFGWFC
Gross margin – 65.3% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – -29.7% –
Pretax margin – 14.5% –
Net margin – -42.5% –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – 13.3% –
Return on assets – 0.6% –
Return on invested capital – -0.9% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGSSMFGWFC
Debt / assets – 5.0% –
Debt / equity – 1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 94.3% 96.4% 92.1%
Equity / assets 5.7% 3.6% –
Interest coverage – -0.1x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGSSMFGWFC
Dividend yield 2.0% 1.2% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 2.0% 1.2% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGSSMFGWFC
Forward P/E 12.1xFY2026 14.5xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $75.07FY2026 $1.67FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +46.3%FY2026 +28.5%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -6.8% +2.4% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $68.80BFY2026 $34.01BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.1%FY2026 -50.1%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.5% +14.2% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGSSMFGWFC
Held by institutions 72.1% 3.5% 76.8%
Institutions holding 3,149 459 2,877
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.1% +7.9% +1.1%
Institutions buying 1,552 291 1,292
Institutions selling 1,124 91 1,134
Buyers to sellers 1.38 3.20 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GSSMFGWFC
GS 1.00 0.45 0.44
SMFG 0.45 1.00 0.33
WFC 0.44 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GS, SMFG and WFC?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Goldman Sachs (GS) $265.82B, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) $92.82B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $250.40B.

Which stock is cheaper, GS, SMFG and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.8x, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) -2.1x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 12.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.1x, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) 14.5x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +34.8%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) returned the most: Goldman Sachs (GS) +15.5%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +51.1%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -5.0%. Over five years, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) compounded fastest (Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.1%/yr, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +29.9%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has the highest dividend yield: Goldman Sachs (GS) 1.97%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) 1.20%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 2.24%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has been the steadiest (Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) 29.2%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GS, SMFG and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.