GS vs SHG vs MUFG Stock Comparison

Goldman Sachs, Shinhan Financial and Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$927.52 +1.2% 1M +18.4% 1Y
Market cap
$266.61B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Shinhan Financial leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Shinhan Financial 4, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 4, Goldman Sachs 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGSSHGMUFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $266.61B $31.80B $245.01B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.5x 11.6x 16.2x SHG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.4x 7.5x 12.8x SHG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.7% +23.8% -12.0% SHG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 3.4% 47.7% MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.3% 3.6% SHG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 9.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.4% +25.2% +46.3% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.6%/yr +15.3%/yr +31.9%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.9% 34.1% 26.3% MUFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 46/100 37/100 GS

Percentile Scorecard

GSSHGMUFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGSSHGMUFG
Valuation 17 #301 of 361 86 #52 of 361 19 #292 of 361
Growth 97 #6 of 153 33 #103 of 153 80 #31 of 153
Profitability – 24 #98 of 128 62 #49 of 128
Financial Health – 4 #135 of 140 9 #128 of 140
Shareholder Returns 29 #237 of 335 85 #51 of 335 16 #281 of 335
Overall 48 46 37
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • SHG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGSSHGMUFGSPY
1 month +1.2%-19.5%-5.1% +0.7%
3 months -9.5%-8.8%-2.4% +3.7%
6 months +0.4%-4.2%+22.3% +7.1%
Year to date +5.5%+22.9%+38.4% +12.8%
1 year +18.4%+25.2%+46.3% +11.9%
3 years +208.3%+160.7%+161.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +45.6%+37.7%+37.7% +22.8%
5 years +124.4%+104.0%+298.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year +17.6%+15.3%+31.9% +10.9%
10 years +423.6%+73.4%+328.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year +18.0%+5.7%+15.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGSSHGMUFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.9%34.1%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.3%32.3%26.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.631.090.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.580.741.76 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.0%-36.5%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.5%-22.0%-9.1% -1.2%
52-week high $1,152.07$84.56$24.14 $779.14
52-week low $773.70$51.42$14.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGSSHGMUFG
P/E now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 12.2x 11.7xmedian 12.2x 16.6xmedian 12.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 3.4x 0.4xmedian 3.4x 8.2xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.3x 15.2xmedian 5.3x —median 5.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.4xmedian 10.8x 4.4xmedian 10.8x —median 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.34 -1.36median 1.34 0.28median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGSSHGMUFG
Revenue $69.70B $81.30B $31.62B
Gross profit – – $29.85B
Operating income – $5.04B $18.02B
Net income – $3.42B $13.97B
Free cash flow – $7.15B –
EPS (diluted) $69.89 $5.62 $1.32
Cash & equivalents $177.00B – –
Total debt – $58.93B $494.43B
Shares (diluted) 304.90M 488.92M 11.40B
Enterprise value $266.61B $31.80B -$96.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGSSHGMUFG
P/E 13.1x 11.7x 16.6x
P/FCF -6.4x 4.4x –
P/Operating cash flow – 4.3x –
P/S 3.9x 0.4x 8.2x
P/B 2.2x 0.8x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 0.9x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – 15.2x –
EV/EBIT – 17.9x 5.8x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 1.1x 3.3x
EV/FCF – 12.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 -1.36 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGSSHGMUFG
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.7% 23.8% -12.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.3% -8.6% -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 38.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 7.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -51.1% 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -10.0% 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – -7.8% 62.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -4.0% 32.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.0% -22.8% 104.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 49.3% -8.6% 59.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 100.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 13.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 106.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGSSHGMUFG
Gross margin – – 94.4%
EBITDA margin – 7.3% –
Operating margin – 6.2% 57.0%
Pretax margin – 13.1% 59.6%
Net margin – 3.4% 47.7%
FCF margin – 8.8% –
Operating cash flow margin – 9.0% –
Return on equity – 11.5% 11.7%
Return on assets – 0.9% 0.5%
Return on invested capital – 4.3% 3.6%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGSSHGMUFG
Debt / assets – 10.8% 4.7%
Debt / equity – 1.5x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 9.9x –
Debt / FCF – 8.2x –
Liabilities / assets 94.3% 92.6% 96.0%
Equity / assets 5.7% 7.4% 4.0%
Interest coverage – 0.6x 0.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGSSHGMUFG
Dividend yield 1.9% 3.0% 1.4%
Net buyback yield – 2.6% –
Shareholder yield 1.9% 5.7% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGSSHGMUFG
Forward P/E 12.4xFY2026 7.5xFY2026 12.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $75.07FY2026 $8.77FY2026 $1.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +46.3%FY2026 +31.3%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -6.8% +10.1% +0.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $68.80BFY2026 $13.05BFY2026 $44.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.1%FY2026 +24.2%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.5% -1.9% +4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGSSHGMUFG
Held by institutions 72.1% 5.1% 3.0%
Institutions holding 3,151 301 575
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.1% +10.6% -0.1%
Institutions buying 1,554 206 325
Institutions selling 1,124 59 160
Buyers to sellers 1.38 3.49 2.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GSSHGMUFG
GS 1.00 0.37 0.47
SHG 0.37 1.00 0.46
MUFG 0.47 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GS, SHG and MUFG?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Goldman Sachs (GS) $266.61B, Shinhan Financial (SHG) $31.80B, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $245.01B.

Which stock is cheaper, GS, SHG and MUFG?

Shinhan Financial (SHG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.5x, Shinhan Financial (SHG) 11.6x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Shinhan Financial (SHG) is cheapest (Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.4x, Shinhan Financial (SHG) 7.5x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Shinhan Financial (SHG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%, Shinhan Financial (SHG) +23.8%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Shinhan Financial (SHG) 3.4%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%). On return on invested capital, Shinhan Financial (SHG) leads (Shinhan Financial (SHG) 4.3%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.4%, Shinhan Financial (SHG) +25.2%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +46.3%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.6%/yr, Shinhan Financial (SHG) +15.3%/yr, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has been the steadiest (Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%, Shinhan Financial (SHG) 34.1%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GS, SHG and MUFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Shinhan Financial (SHG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.