GRRR vs RVSN vs HOLO Stock Comparison

Gorilla Technology, Rail Vision and MicroCloud Hologram Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RVSN Rail Vision Ltd.
$3.19 -10.4% 1M -78.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.55M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Gorilla Technology leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Gorilla Technology 3, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRRRRVSNHOLOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $222.50M $5.55M $16.01M GRRR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.5x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +50.4% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -35.4% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.3% -78.4% -73.7% GRRR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -37.9%/yr — -89.2%/yr GRRR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 87.6% 100.2% 67.1% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

GRRRRVSNHOLO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRRRRVSNHOLO
Valuation 45 #69 of 124 – –
Growth 73 #31 of 113 – –
Profitability 32 #74 of 109 – –
Financial Health 41 #76 of 127 95 #7 of 127 99 #2 of 127
Shareholder Returns 8 #60 of 65 – –
Overall 40 – –
  • GRRR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • RVSN ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRRRRVSNHOLOSPY
1 month -34.2%-10.4%-28.1% -0.2%
3 months -20.9%-22.4%-25.9% +3.9%
6 months -29.4%-59.0%-28.1% +8.2%
Year to date -15.6%-67.2%-54.5% +12.9%
1 year -45.3%-78.4%-73.7% +12.3%
3 years +13.5%-95.5%-100.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +4.3%-64.5%-93.6% +23.3%
5 years -90.8%—-100.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -37.9%—-89.2% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureGRRRRVSNHOLOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 87.6%100.2%67.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 93.2%101.9%74.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.662.102.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.52-0.78-1.10 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.4%-99.6%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -57.7%-78.4%-73.7% -1.2%
52-week high $21.78$14.77$4.57 $779.14
52-week low $7.44$2.88$1.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRRRRVSNHOLO
P/E now vs peer median -4.1xmedian 38.6x —median 38.6x —median 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 4.4x —median 4.4x —median 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -36.5xmedian 29.4x —median 29.4x —median 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 3.3x 0.4xmedian 3.3x 0.0xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.28 —median 1.28 —median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRRRRVSNHOLO
Revenue $140.40M – –
Gross profit $24.27M – –
Operating income -$51.78M – –
Net income -$51.45M – –
Free cash flow -$6.62M – –
R&D $4.02M – –
EPS (diluted) $-2.23 – –
Cash & equivalents $179.36M $15.31M $110.42M
Total debt $6.95B – $1.87M
Shares (diluted) 22.25M 1.81M 13.18M
Enterprise value -$268.94M -$69.39M -$2.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRRRRVSNHOLO
P/E -4.1x – –
P/FCF -36.5x – –
P/Operating cash flow -11.8x – –
P/S 1.7x – –
P/B 1.4x 0.4x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 0.4x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA -2.7x – –
EV/EBIT -2.6x – –
EV/Revenue 1.0x – –
EV/FCF -20.4x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -6.6x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRRRRVSNHOLO
Revenue growth (1Y) 50.4% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -26.6% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.4% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 34.1% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) 68.5% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 33.7% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 78.9% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRRRRVSNHOLO
Gross margin 17.3% – –
EBITDA margin -36.2% – –
Operating margin -36.9% – –
Pretax margin -32.9% – –
Net margin -35.4% – –
FCF margin -4.7% – –
Operating cash flow margin -14.6% – –
Return on equity -29.1% – –
Return on assets -15.7% – –
Return on invested capital -2.9% – –
Return on capital employed -30.8% – –
Asset turnover 0.4x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRRRRVSNHOLO
Debt / assets 18.8% – 0.0%
Debt / equity 0.4x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x – –
Debt / FCF -11.1x – –
Liabilities / assets 56.2% 10.2% 2.9%
Equity / assets 43.8% 89.8% 97.1%
Interest coverage -21.8x – –
Current ratio 2.2x 9.6x 34.6x
Quick ratio 2.1x 8.8x 107.3x
Cash ratio 1.2x 8.5x 107.0x
Altman Z-score 0.43 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRRRRVSNHOLO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -12.3% – –
Shareholder yield -12.3% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRRRRVSNHOLO
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.61FY2026 $-4.24FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -396.6%FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $201.05MFY2026 $4.20MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +98.4%FY2026 +181.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +217.5% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRRRRVSNHOLO
Held by institutions 26.6% – 3.0%
Institutions holding 71 – 16
Change in shares held, QoQ +79.3% – +135.7%
Institutions buying 50 – 11
Institutions selling 13 – 0
Buyers to sellers 3.85 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRRRRVSNHOLO
GRRR 1.00 0.35 0.41
RVSN 0.35 1.00 0.27
HOLO 0.41 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRRR, RVSN and HOLO?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gorilla Technology (GRRR) $222.50M, Rail Vision (RVSN) $5.55M, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $16.01M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gorilla Technology (GRRR) returned the most: Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -45.3%, Rail Vision (RVSN) -78.4%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -73.7%. Over five years, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) compounded fastest (Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -37.9%/yr, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (Gorilla Technology (GRRR) 87.6%, Rail Vision (RVSN) 100.2%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRRR, RVSN and HOLO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.