GROY vs LU vs ECPG Stock Comparison

Gold Royalty, Lufax Holding and Encore Capital Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GROY Gold Royalty Corp.
$2.84 -10.1% 1M -23.0% 1Y
Market cap
$505.71M
P/E
335.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$22.56M
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
1 win
LU Lufax Holding Ltd
$8.50 +585.5% 1M +157.6% 1Y
Market cap
$7.37B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
2 wins
ECPG Encore Capital Group Inc
$99.64 +1.2% 1M +122.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.14B
P/E
7.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.90B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Encore Capital leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Encore Capital 7, Lufax Holding 2, Gold Royalty 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGROYLUECPGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $505.71M $7.37B $2.14B LU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 335.4x -16.8x 7.1x ECPG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 71.0x — 7.1x ECPG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +82.3% +7.7% +29.5% GROY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.7% -34.1% 15.9% ECPG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -1.1% 10.7% ECPG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 5.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.0% +157.6% +122.5% LU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.2%/yr -20.8%/yr +13.4%/yr ECPG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.2% 235.8% 34.7% ECPG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 33/100 67/100 ECPG

Percentile Scorecard

GROYLUECPG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGROYLUECPG
Valuation 18 #139 of 170 41 #101 of 170 69 #54 of 170
Growth 98 #5 of 160 27 #117 of 160 93 #12 of 160
Profitability 51 #74 of 149 24 #113 of 149 78 #33 of 149
Financial Health 97 #6 of 158 40 #96 of 158 24 #120 of 158
Shareholder Returns 2 #132 of 135 – 71 #40 of 135
Overall 53 33 67
  • GROY ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • LU ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • ECPG ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGROYLUECPGSPY
1 month -10.1%+585.5%+1.2% -0.8%
3 months +7.6%+482.2%+5.5% +3.5%
6 months -20.2%+347.4%+18.2% +7.0%
Year to date -29.7%+232.0%+83.3% +12.2%
1 year -23.0%+157.6%+122.5% +13.0%
3 years +118.5%+123.7%+152.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +29.8%+30.8%+36.2% +23.1%
5 years -44.6%-68.8%+87.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -11.2%-20.8%+13.4% +11.0%
10 years ——+400.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+17.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGROYLUECPGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.2%235.8%34.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.1%59.3%31.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.680.070.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.430.673.53 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.8%-97.2%-62.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -45.5%0.0%-5.6% -1.8%
52-week high $5.21$8.50$105.60 $779.14
52-week low $2.52$0.83$40.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGROYLUECPG
P/E now vs peer median 329.6xmedian 11.0x -16.8xmedian 11.0x 7.1xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 28.3xmedian 2.6x 5.7xmedian 2.6x 1.1xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 103.6xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x 8.2xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 59.0xmedian 6.9x 9.9xmedian 6.9x 16.9xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.7x 0.6xmedian 0.7x 2.0xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 0.38median 0.32 0.02median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGROYLUECPG
Revenue $22.56M $1.29B $1.90B
Gross profit $16.06M – –
Operating income $5.94M – $717.47M
Net income $1.50M -$381.02M $301.56M
Free cash flow $10.81M $747.06M $125.14M
EPS (diluted) – $-0.51 $13.23
Cash & equivalents $11.33M – $182.93M
Total debt – $9.62B $4.18B
Shares (diluted) – 866.69M 22.79M
Enterprise value $455.76M $1.69B $1.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGROYLUECPG
P/E 329.6x -16.8x 7.1x
P/FCF 59.0x 9.9x 16.9x
P/Operating cash flow 59.0x 9.9x 14.0x
P/S 28.3x 5.7x 1.1x
P/B 0.9x 0.6x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 0.6x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 103.6x – 8.2x
EV/EBIT 105.0x -60.5x 8.5x
EV/Revenue 27.6x 12.3x 3.2x
EV/FCF 57.7x 21.2x 48.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 57.7x 21.2x 40.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.38 0.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGROYLUECPG
Revenue growth (1Y) 82.3% 7.7% 29.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 103.3% -41.4% 17.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 79.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 93.9% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 390.3% – 184.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 37.5% – 44.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 181.3% 18.8% 438.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.5% -47.3% 350.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – 31.9% 450.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -43.7% 359.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 126.4% 19.6% 21.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 51.4% -25.2% -4.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 126.4% 19.6% 30.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 51.2% -25.2% -3.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGROYLUECPG
Gross margin 71.2% – –
EBITDA margin 26.7% – 39.2%
Operating margin 26.3% – 37.7%
Pretax margin 51.7% -20.4% 20.6%
Net margin 6.7% -34.1% 15.9%
FCF margin 47.9% 58.1% 6.6%
Operating cash flow margin 47.9% 58.1% 8.0%
Return on equity 1.1% -3.3% 28.5%
Return on assets 0.9% -1.3% 5.5%
Return on invested capital – -1.1% 10.7%
Return on capital employed 0.7% – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 7.2x -2.0x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 12.7% – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGROYLUECPG
Debt / assets – 32.3% 75.1%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 3.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 5.4x
Debt / FCF – 12.9x 33.4x
Liabilities / assets 14.8% 59.8% 80.6%
Equity / assets 85.2% 40.2% 19.4%
Interest coverage 10.3x -707.1x 2.4x
Current ratio 4.8x – –
Quick ratio 4.2x – –
Cash ratio 2.9x – –
Altman Z-score 3.00 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGROYLUECPG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -17.6% – 5.3%
Shareholder yield -17.6% 0.0% 5.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGROYLUECPG
Forward P/E 71.0xFY2026 – 7.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.04FY2026 $-3.19FY2026 $14.11FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +29.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +125.0% – +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $31.65MFY2026 $4.01BFY2026 $1.84BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +102.8%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026 +4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +45.8% -9.3% +11.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGROYLUECPG
Held by institutions 32.9% 8.1% 100.0%
Institutions holding 112 76 283
Change in shares held, QoQ -8.0% -12.0% -3.8%
Institutions buying 49 31 159
Institutions selling 33 29 91
Buyers to sellers 1.48 1.07 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GROYLUECPG
GROY 1.00 0.01 0.08
LU 0.01 1.00 -0.06
ECPG 0.08 -0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GROY, LU and ECPG?

Lufax Holding (LU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gold Royalty (GROY) $505.71M, Lufax Holding (LU) $7.37B, Encore Capital (ECPG) $2.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, GROY, LU and ECPG?

Encore Capital (ECPG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Gold Royalty (GROY) 335.4x, Lufax Holding (LU) -16.8x, Encore Capital (ECPG) 7.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Encore Capital (ECPG) is cheapest (Gold Royalty (GROY) 71.0x, Encore Capital (ECPG) 7.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gold Royalty (GROY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gold Royalty (GROY) +82.3%, Lufax Holding (LU) +7.7%, Encore Capital (ECPG) +29.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Encore Capital (ECPG) has the highest net margin (Gold Royalty (GROY) 6.7%, Lufax Holding (LU) -34.1%, Encore Capital (ECPG) 15.9%). On return on invested capital, Encore Capital (ECPG) leads (Lufax Holding (LU) -1.1%, Encore Capital (ECPG) 10.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lufax Holding (LU) returned the most: Gold Royalty (GROY) -23.0%, Lufax Holding (LU) +157.6%, Encore Capital (ECPG) +122.5%. Over five years, Encore Capital (ECPG) compounded fastest (Gold Royalty (GROY) -11.2%/yr, Lufax Holding (LU) -20.8%/yr, Encore Capital (ECPG) +13.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Encore Capital (ECPG) has been the steadiest (Gold Royalty (GROY) 53.2%, Lufax Holding (LU) 235.8%, Encore Capital (ECPG) 34.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GROY, LU and ECPG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Encore Capital (ECPG) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.