GRBK vs PHM vs MHO Stock Comparison

Green Brick Partners, Pultegroup and M Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PHM Pultegroup Inc/Mi/
$121.27 +1.2% 1M +0.6% 1Y
Market cap
$22.73B
P/E
12.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.98B
Div. yield
–
Homebuilders Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
MHO M/I Homes, Inc.
$124.60 -10.1% 1M -4.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.20B
P/E
11.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.21B
Div. yield
–
Homebuilders Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Pultegroup leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Pultegroup 6, Green Brick Partners 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRBKPHMMHOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.76B $22.73B $3.20B PHM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 9.5x 12.7x 11.5x GRBK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.4x 13.6x 10.6x GRBK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -5.7% -9.3% -6.0% GRBK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.7% 11.2% 6.6% GRBK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.4% 14.1% — PHM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.1x — PHM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -5.8% +0.6% -4.0% PHM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.8%/yr +20.0%/yr +16.7%/yr GRBK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.6% 33.2% 33.9% PHM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 66/100 58/100 PHM

Percentile Scorecard

GRBKPHMMHO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRBKPHMMHO
Valuation 50 #11 of 21 45 #12 of 21 60 #9 of 21
Growth 84 #4 of 20 68 #7 of 20 47 #11 of 20
Profitability 77 #5 of 18 82 #4 of 18 35 #12 of 18
Financial Health 77 #5 of 18 88 #3 of 18 82 #4 of 18
Shareholder Returns 19 #14 of 17 44 #10 of 17 63 #7 of 17
Overall 61 66 58
  • GRBK ranked among 24 companies in Homebuilding
  • PHM ranked among 24 companies in Homebuilding
  • MHO ranked among 24 companies in Homebuilding

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRBKPHMMHOSPY
1 month -6.8%+1.2%-10.1% -0.8%
3 months -11.5%-7.1%-16.2% +3.5%
6 months -9.5%-5.5%-7.2% +7.0%
Year to date +2.3%+3.4%-2.6% +12.2%
1 year -5.8%+0.6%-4.0% +13.0%
3 years +67.1%+68.6%+53.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +18.7%+19.0%+15.3% +23.1%
5 years +157.6%+148.8%+116.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +20.8%+20.0%+16.7% +11.0%
10 years +716.7%+552.7%+463.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +23.4%+20.6%+18.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGRBKPHMMHOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.6%33.2%33.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.3%30.2%32.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.840.890.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.170.02-0.12 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -45.1%-38.3%-44.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.4%-14.9%-23.6% -1.8%
52-week high $80.59$142.56$163.00 $779.14
52-week low $60.10$109.38$114.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRBKPHMMHO
P/E now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 12.7x 12.6xmedian 12.7x 11.4xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 0.6x 1.4xmedian 0.6x 0.7xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 9.4x 8.2xmedian 9.4x —median 9.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.7xmedian 16.0x 17.2xmedian 16.0x 22.8xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.1x 1.7xmedian 1.1x 1.0xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median 2.03median 1.06 -1.42median 1.06 -0.80median 1.06

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRBKPHMMHO
Revenue $1.98B $15.98B $4.21B
Gross profit $606.74M $4.21B –
Operating income $383.06M $2.66B –
Net income $314.87M $1.80B $277.42M
Free cash flow $111.62M $1.30B $137.09M
EPS (diluted) $6.73 $9.56 $10.69
Cash & equivalents $131.64M $1.41B $620.60M
Total debt $1.14B $1.81B $230.42M
Shares (diluted) 43.28M 187.84M 25.95M
Enterprise value $2.19B $16.09B $390.66M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRBKPHMMHO
P/E 9.5x 12.6x 11.4x
P/FCF 24.7x 17.2x 22.8x
P/Operating cash flow 23.5x 15.9x 20.7x
P/S 1.4x 1.4x 0.7x
P/B 1.4x 1.7x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 1.7x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 7.5x 8.2x –
EV/EBIT 7.6x 8.6x –
EV/Revenue 1.5x 1.4x 0.6x
EV/FCF 26.1x 17.5x 19.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.8x 16.1x 18.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.03 -1.42 -0.80

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRBKPHMMHO
Revenue growth (1Y) -5.7% -9.3% -6.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.3% -1.8% -0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -11.9% -16.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.7% -6.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -16.8% -27.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.1% -11.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) -18.1% -31.7% -41.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.7% -13.5% -17.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -15.7% -28.0% -38.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.7% -8.8% -14.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -29.5% -15.6% -39.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -22.5% -21.2% -40.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -31.4% -16.3% -43.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -23.3% -22.5% -41.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRBKPHMMHO
Gross margin 30.6% 26.3% –
EBITDA margin 19.6% 17.3% –
Operating margin 19.3% 16.6% –
Pretax margin 20.4% 16.6% –
Net margin 14.7% 11.2% 6.6%
FCF margin 5.6% 8.1% 3.3%
Operating cash flow margin 5.9% 8.8% 3.6%
Return on equity 16.0% 16.1% –
Return on assets 12.3% 11.4% –
Return on invested capital 13.4% 14.1% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.9x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 0.8x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.4% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRBKPHMMHO
Debt / assets 11.0% 9.8% 4.7%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.1x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.1x –
Debt / FCF 2.6x 1.4x 1.7x
Liabilities / assets 23.6% 29.2% 33.1%
Equity / assets 76.4% 70.8% 66.9%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRBKPHMMHO
Dividend yield – 0.9% –
Net buyback yield 1.4% 6.0% 6.2%
Shareholder yield 1.4% 6.8% 6.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRBKPHMMHO
Forward P/E 10.4xFY2026 13.6xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.18FY2026 $8.93FY2026 $11.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -12.6%FY2026 -19.7%FY2026 -28.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -9.1% +3.5% +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.96BFY2026 $16.06BFY2026 $4.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -6.8%FY2026 -7.2%FY2026 -7.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -8.5% +4.0% +4.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRBKPHMMHO
Held by institutions 80.4% 94.3% 96.2%
Institutions holding 324 1,042 353
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +1.7% +1.6%
Institutions buying 170 485 190
Institutions selling 91 403 120
Buyers to sellers 1.87 1.20 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRBKPHMMHO
GRBK 1.00 0.86 0.81
PHM 0.86 1.00 0.83
MHO 0.81 0.83 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRBK, PHM and MHO?

Pultegroup (PHM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Green Brick Partners (GRBK) $2.76B, Pultegroup (PHM) $22.73B, M (MHO) $3.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, GRBK, PHM and MHO?

Green Brick Partners (GRBK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 9.5x, Pultegroup (PHM) 12.7x, M (MHO) 11.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) is cheapest (Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 10.4x, Pultegroup (PHM) 13.6x, M (MHO) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Green Brick Partners (GRBK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Green Brick Partners (GRBK) -5.7%, Pultegroup (PHM) -9.3%, M (MHO) -6.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Green Brick Partners (GRBK) has the highest net margin (Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 14.7%, Pultegroup (PHM) 11.2%, M (MHO) 6.6%). On return on invested capital, Pultegroup (PHM) leads (Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 13.4%, Pultegroup (PHM) 14.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Pultegroup (PHM) returned the most: Green Brick Partners (GRBK) -5.8%, Pultegroup (PHM) +0.6%, M (MHO) -4.0%. Over five years, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) compounded fastest (Green Brick Partners (GRBK) +20.8%/yr, Pultegroup (PHM) +20.0%/yr, M (MHO) +16.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Pultegroup (PHM) has been the steadiest (Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 33.6%, Pultegroup (PHM) 33.2%, M (MHO) 33.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRBK, PHM and MHO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Pultegroup (PHM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.