GRAB vs UPS vs DASH Stock Comparison

Grab Holdings, United Parcel Service and DoorDash Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.71 -13.4% 1M -53.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.15B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins
UPS United Parcel Service Inc
$100.20 +6.7% 1M +14.9% 1Y
Market cap
$89.07B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$89.93B
Div. yield
–
Parcel Delivery Industrials
6 wins
DASH DoorDash, Inc.
$168.44 -12.9% 1M -34.8% 1Y
Market cap
$75.21B
P/E
89.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.89B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United Parcel Service leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (United Parcel Service 6, Grab Holdings 3, DoorDash 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRABUPSDASHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.15B $89.07B $75.21B UPS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.5x 19.5x 89.4x UPS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.9x 14.8x 60.6x UPS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.5% -0.4% +33.6% DASH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.3% 5.1% 5.3% GRAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% 12.9% — UPS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.5x 1.9x — GRAB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.7% +14.9% -34.8% UPS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.2%/yr -13.9%/yr -3.3%/yr DASH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.7% 30.6% 50.1% UPS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 45/100 54/100 GRAB

Percentile Scorecard

GRABUPSDASH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRABUPSDASH
Valuation 46 #90 of 167 46 #74 of 136 27 #122 of 167
Growth 80 #32 of 153 23 #94 of 122 82 #28 of 153
Profitability 45 #84 of 153 70 #36 of 116 62 #59 of 153
Financial Health 51 #89 of 179 33 #97 of 144 57 #77 of 179
Shareholder Returns – 56 #37 of 82 43 #54 of 94
Overall 56 45 54
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • UPS ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • DASH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRABUPSDASHSPY
1 month -13.4%+6.7%-12.9% -0.8%
3 months -19.1%-11.2%-8.6% +3.5%
6 months -30.3%-7.4%-3.2% +7.0%
Year to date -45.7%+1.0%-25.6% +12.2%
1 year -53.7%+14.9%-34.8% +13.0%
3 years -10.6%-25.7%+138.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.7%-9.4%+33.6% +23.1%
5 years -79.5%-52.8%-15.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.2%-13.9%-3.3% +11.0%
10 years —-7.7%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-0.8%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGRABUPSDASHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.7%30.6%50.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.5%33.6%53.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.711.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.390.49-0.69 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.5%-64.4%-82.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.7%-16.5%-36.7% -1.8%
52-week high $6.12$120.00$266.06 $779.14
52-week low $2.71$89.22$146.60 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRABUPSDASH
P/E now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 17.5x 18.7xmedian 16.1x 87.0xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.4x 0.8xmedian 1.0x 4.6xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.5xmedian 14.5x 9.1xmedian 8.7x 37.6xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 55.7xmedian 12.1x 13.8xmedian 11.5x 28.1xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.7x 5.0xmedian 1.2x 7.4xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.41 -0.82median 0.81 2.33median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRABUPSDASH
Revenue $3.73B $89.93B $15.89B
Gross profit $1.63B – $8.17B
Operating income $120.00M $6.58B $712.00M
Net income $525.00M $4.57B $841.00M
Free cash flow $193.00M $5.46B $2.60B
R&D $417.00M – $1.71B
EPS (diluted) $0.14 $5.37 $1.91
Cash & equivalents $2.86B $4.65B $4.42B
Total debt $2.99B $24.48B –
Shares (diluted) 4.21B 851.00M 439.35M
Enterprise value -$3.97B $65.96B $54.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRABUPSDASH
P/E 19.4x 18.7x 87.0x
P/FCF 55.7x 13.8x 28.1x
P/Operating cash flow 82.7x 8.5x 25.8x
P/S 2.9x 0.8x 4.6x
P/B 1.6x 5.0x 7.4x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 6.7x 9.2x
EV/EBITDA 26.5x 9.1x 37.6x
EV/EBIT 71.9x 14.4x 95.0x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 1.1x 4.3x
EV/FCF 44.7x 17.4x 26.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 66.3x 10.7x 23.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.82 2.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRABUPSDASH
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.5% -0.4% 33.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.6% -2.2% 27.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.6% – 37.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 69.9% – 32.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 340.0% -21.7% 31.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% -17.3% 38.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 837.5% -20.2% 7.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.1% -23.0% 38.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 82.0% -20.6% 7.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -22.7% 37.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -82.1% 18.6% 29.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.4% -8.0% 40.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.7% 54.2% 30.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.6% -4.2% 45.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRABUPSDASH
Gross margin 43.6% – 51.4%
EBITDA margin 8.7% 11.6% 11.3%
Operating margin 3.2% 7.3% 4.5%
Pretax margin 13.9% 6.5% 5.5%
Net margin 15.3% 5.1% 5.3%
FCF margin 5.2% 6.1% 16.3%
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% 9.9% 17.8%
Return on equity 7.9% 29.6% 8.3%
Return on assets 4.2% 6.4% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 1.5% 12.9% –
Return on capital employed 1.7% 11.6% 5.3%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.3x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 1.9x 3.4x
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% 0.1% 7.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRABUPSDASH
Debt / assets 15.1% 34.4% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA -6.5x 1.9x –
Debt / FCF 10.5x 4.5x –
Liabilities / assets 49.7% 78.8% 49.3%
Equity / assets 50.3% 21.2% 50.7%
Interest coverage 1.1x 6.0x –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.2x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.0x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.3x 0.9x
Altman Z-score -0.27 2.78 5.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRABUPSDASH
Dividend yield – 6.5% –
Net buyback yield – -0.2% 1.4%
Shareholder yield – 6.4% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRABUPSDASH
Forward P/E 16.9xFY2026 14.8xFY2026 60.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 $6.75FY2026 $2.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +166.7%FY2026 -5.7%FY2026 +30.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.5% +26.7% +79.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.07BFY2026 $87.80BFY2026 $18.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026 +37.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +33.7% +14.6% +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRABUPSDASH
Held by institutions 75.6% 70.9% 88.2%
Institutions holding 483 2,137 1,043
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +6.0% +7.4%
Institutions buying 231 1,088 578
Institutions selling 168 809 349
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.34 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRABUPSDASH
GRAB 1.00 0.15 0.38
UPS 0.15 1.00 0.11
DASH 0.38 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRAB, UPS and DASH?

United Parcel Service (UPS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.15B, United Parcel Service (UPS) $89.07B, DoorDash (DASH) $75.21B.

Which stock is cheaper, GRAB, UPS and DASH?

United Parcel Service (UPS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.5x, United Parcel Service (UPS) 19.5x, DoorDash (DASH) 89.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, United Parcel Service (UPS) is cheapest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 16.9x, United Parcel Service (UPS) 14.8x, DoorDash (DASH) 60.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

DoorDash (DASH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%, United Parcel Service (UPS) -0.4%, DoorDash (DASH) +33.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) has the highest net margin (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%, United Parcel Service (UPS) 5.1%, DoorDash (DASH) 5.3%). On return on invested capital, United Parcel Service (UPS) leads (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%, United Parcel Service (UPS) 12.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Parcel Service (UPS) returned the most: Grab Holdings (GRAB) -53.7%, United Parcel Service (UPS) +14.9%, DoorDash (DASH) -34.8%. Over five years, DoorDash (DASH) compounded fastest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) -27.2%/yr, United Parcel Service (UPS) -13.9%/yr, DoorDash (DASH) -3.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, United Parcel Service (UPS) has been the steadiest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.7%, United Parcel Service (UPS) 30.6%, DoorDash (DASH) 50.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRAB, UPS and DASH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Parcel Service (UPS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.