GRAB vs UBER vs UNP Stock Comparison

Grab Holdings, Uber Technologies and Union Pacific Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.79 -12.8% 1M -51.2% 1Y
Market cap
$11.05B
P/E
19.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc
$66.67 -4.0% 1M -29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$134.60B
P/E
14.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.23B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
4 wins
UNP Union Pacific Corp
$292.89 +6.3% 1M +33.1% 1Y
Market cap
$176.20B
P/E
23.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.36B
Div. yield
–
Railroads Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Union Pacific leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Union Pacific 4, Uber Technologies 4, Grab Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRABUBERUNPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.05B $134.60B $176.20B UNP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.3x 14.1x 23.1x UBER
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.4x 19.1x 21.2x GRAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.5% +16.7% +7.4% GRAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.3% 17.3% 28.9% UNP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% 17.4% 15.7% UBER
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.5x 1.0x 2.1x GRAB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -51.2% -29.5% +33.1% UNP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -24.0%/yr +7.9%/yr +4.3%/yr UBER
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.9% 35.4% 22.6% UNP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 67/100 45/100 UBER

Percentile Scorecard

GRABUBERUNP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRABUBERUNP
Valuation 46 #91 of 167 60 #67 of 167 16 #114 of 136
Growth 81 #30 of 153 86 #23 of 153 60 #49 of 122
Profitability 45 #84 of 153 78 #34 of 153 88 #15 of 119
Financial Health 51 #89 of 179 48 #94 of 179 38 #92 of 147
Shareholder Returns – 63 #35 of 94 24 #64 of 84
Overall 56 67 45
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • UBER ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • UNP ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRABUBERUNPSPY
1 month -12.8%-4.0%+6.3% -1.0%
3 months -15.7%+1.1%-4.8% +2.9%
6 months -28.5%-10.7%+9.0% +6.4%
Year to date -44.1%-18.4%+26.6% +11.4%
1 year -51.2%-29.5%+33.1% +13.1%
3 years -14.9%+50.9%+42.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year -5.3%+14.7%+12.6% +21.5%
5 years -74.6%+46.5%+23.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year -24.0%+7.9%+4.3% +10.9%
10 years ——+224.1% +255.2%
10 years, per year ——+12.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureGRABUBERUNPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.9%35.4%22.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.5%35.4%21.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.430.830.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.32-0.831.46 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.5%-56.6%-32.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.4%-33.1%-5.7% -2.5%
52-week high $6.12$99.72$310.62 $779.14
52-week low $2.79$65.95$216.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRABUBERUNP
P/E now vs peer median 20.0xmedian 17.5x 14.2xmedian 17.5x 22.8xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 1.4x 2.5xmedian 1.4x 6.6xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 14.9x 19.2xmedian 14.9x 15.4xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 57.4xmedian 11.2x 13.4xmedian 11.2x 26.0xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.7x 4.8xmedian 1.7x 7.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.42 0.07median 0.42 3.23median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRABUBERUNP
Revenue $3.73B $55.23B $26.36B
Gross profit $1.63B $23.36B –
Operating income $120.00M $6.70B $10.57B
Net income $525.00M $9.67B $7.62B
Free cash flow $193.00M $10.12B $6.69B
R&D $417.00M $3.74B –
EPS (diluted) $0.14 $4.67 $12.81
Cash & equivalents $2.86B $4.87B $2.21B
Total debt $2.99B $12.72B $123.11B
Shares (diluted) 4.21B 2.05B 594.50M
Enterprise value -$4.08B $106.40B $168.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRABUBERUNP
P/E 20.0x 14.2x 22.8x
P/FCF 57.4x 13.4x 26.0x
P/Operating cash flow 85.2x 13.0x 16.5x
P/S 3.0x 2.5x 6.6x
P/B 1.6x 4.8x 7.9x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 5.0x 7.9x
EV/EBITDA 27.4x 19.2x 15.4x
EV/EBIT 74.5x 21.4x 19.1x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 2.6x 7.6x
EV/FCF 46.3x 14.2x 30.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 68.8x 13.8x 19.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.07 3.23

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRABUBERUNP
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.5% 16.7% 7.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.6% 16.4% 3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.6% 24.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 69.9% 19.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 340.0% 48.6% 6.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% 139.2% 5.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 837.5% -23.4% 8.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.1% 203.6% 6.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 82.0% -21.3% 7.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 203.6% 7.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -82.1% 18.6% 8.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.4% 73.8% 8.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.7% 18.5% 11.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.6% 79.7% 12.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRABUBERUNP
Gross margin 43.6% 42.3% –
EBITDA margin 8.7% 13.5% 49.7%
Operating margin 3.2% 12.1% 40.1%
Pretax margin 13.9% 12.1% 37.6%
Net margin 15.3% 17.3% 28.9%
FCF margin 5.2% 18.3% 25.4%
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% 18.9% 39.9%
Return on equity 7.9% 35.9% 35.7%
Return on assets 4.2% 15.4% 10.6%
Return on invested capital 1.5% 17.4% 15.7%
Return on capital employed 1.7% 14.0% 15.9%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.9x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 1.1x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% 3.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRABUBERUNP
Debt / assets 15.1% 19.3% 41.8%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.5x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -6.5x 1.0x 2.1x
Debt / FCF 10.5x 1.3x 4.5x
Liabilities / assets 49.7% 57.1% 69.7%
Equity / assets 50.3% 42.9% 30.3%
Interest coverage 1.1x 14.5x 8.3x
Current ratio 1.5x 0.8x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.4x 0.6x
Altman Z-score -0.24 3.13 4.33

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRABUBERUNP
Dividend yield – – 1.9%
Net buyback yield – 5.0% 0.0%
Shareholder yield – 5.0% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRABUBERUNP
Forward P/E 17.4xFY2026 19.1xFY2026 21.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 $3.49FY2026 $13.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +166.7%FY2026 -26.2%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.5% +20.6% -1.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.07BFY2026 $61.46BFY2026 $27.79BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 +18.2%FY2026 +13.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +33.7% +15.9% +4.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRABUBERUNP
Held by institutions 75.6% 82.5% 89.0%
Institutions holding 483 2,410 2,888
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +1.3% +2.4%
Institutions buying 231 1,184 1,447
Institutions selling 168 976 985
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.21 1.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRABUBERUNP
GRAB 1.00 0.43 0.10
UBER 0.43 1.00 0.07
UNP 0.10 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRAB, UBER and UNP?

Union Pacific (UNP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.05B, Uber Technologies (UBER) $134.60B, Union Pacific (UNP) $176.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, GRAB, UBER and UNP?

Uber Technologies (UBER) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.3x, Uber Technologies (UBER) 14.1x, Union Pacific (UNP) 23.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grab Holdings (GRAB) is cheapest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 17.4x, Uber Technologies (UBER) 19.1x, Union Pacific (UNP) 21.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%, Uber Technologies (UBER) +16.7%, Union Pacific (UNP) +7.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Union Pacific (UNP) has the highest net margin (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 17.3%, Union Pacific (UNP) 28.9%). On return on invested capital, Uber Technologies (UBER) leads (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 17.4%, Union Pacific (UNP) 15.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Union Pacific (UNP) returned the most: Grab Holdings (GRAB) -51.2%, Uber Technologies (UBER) -29.5%, Union Pacific (UNP) +33.1%. Over five years, Uber Technologies (UBER) compounded fastest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) -24.0%/yr, Uber Technologies (UBER) +7.9%/yr, Union Pacific (UNP) +4.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Union Pacific (UNP) has been the steadiest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.9%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 35.4%, Union Pacific (UNP) 22.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRAB, UBER and UNP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Union Pacific (UNP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.