GRAB vs QFIN vs MRT Stock Comparison

Grab Holdings, Qfin Holdings and Marti Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.71 -13.4% 1M -53.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.11B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
2 wins
QFIN Qfin Holdings, Inc.
$5.57 -23.7% 1M -79.4% 1Y
Market cap
$750.86M
P/E
1.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.41B
Div. yield
–
Digital Lending Technology
6 wins
MRT Marti Technologies, Inc.
$2.00 -6.5% 1M -17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$153.68M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$52.32M
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Qfin Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Qfin Holdings 6, Marti Technologies 3, Grab Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRABQFINMRTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.11B $750.86M $153.68M GRAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.5x 1.4x -3.9x QFIN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.9x 2.0x — QFIN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.5% -7.8% +174.4% MRT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.3% 22.2% -74.9% QFIN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% 17.5% — QFIN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.5x — -7.2x MRT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.7% -79.4% -17.0% MRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.2%/yr -24.1%/yr -27.4%/yr QFIN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.7% 58.8% 56.1% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 79/100 25/100 QFIN

Percentile Scorecard

GRABQFINMRT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRABQFINMRT
Valuation 46 #90 of 167 97 #4 of 99 9 #152 of 167
Growth 80 #32 of 153 39 #58 of 94 59 #64 of 153
Profitability 45 #84 of 153 94 #6 of 90 16 #128 of 153
Financial Health 51 #89 of 179 73 #29 of 105 15 #153 of 179
Shareholder Returns – 92 #6 of 61 –
Overall 56 79 25
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • QFIN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • MRT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRABQFINMRTSPY
1 month -13.4%-23.7%-6.5% -0.8%
3 months -19.1%-58.9%+7.5% +3.5%
6 months -30.3%-58.1%-6.1% +7.0%
Year to date -45.7%-71.1%-15.6% +12.2%
1 year -53.7%-79.4%-17.0% +13.0%
3 years -10.6%-63.1%+300.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.7%-28.3%+58.8% +23.1%
5 years -79.5%-74.8%-79.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.2%-24.1%-27.4% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureGRABQFINMRTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.7%58.8%56.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.5%59.2%56.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.391.110.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.39-1.35-0.30 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.5%-89.1%-96.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.7%-77.6%-24.0% -1.8%
52-week high $6.12$24.86$2.63 $779.14
52-week low $2.71$5.26$1.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRABQFINMRT
P/E now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 17.5x 1.4xmedian 20.6x -4.0xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.4x 0.3xmedian 2.3x 3.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.5xmedian 14.5x —median 15.4x -20.4xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 55.7xmedian 12.1x 0.5xmedian 16.4x -8.7xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.7x 0.2xmedian 1.9x -2.1xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.41 0.29median 1.05 -0.11median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRABQFINMRT
Revenue $3.73B $2.41B $52.32M
Gross profit $1.63B – $33.36M
Operating income $120.00M $675.86M -$16.33M
Net income $525.00M $533.22M -$70.58M
Free cash flow $193.00M $1.27B -$19.81M
R&D $417.00M – $3.04M
EPS (diluted) $0.14 $3.93 $-0.50
Cash & equivalents $2.86B $607.06M $12.50M
Total debt $2.99B $1.05B $106.33M
Shares (diluted) 4.21B 136.09M 78.05M
Enterprise value -$4.01B -$3.82B $124.39M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRABQFINMRT
P/E 19.4x 1.4x -4.0x
P/FCF 55.7x 0.5x -8.7x
P/Operating cash flow 82.7x 0.5x -8.6x
P/S 2.9x 0.3x 3.3x
P/B 1.6x 0.2x -2.1x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 0.2x -2.0x
EV/EBITDA 26.5x – -20.4x
EV/EBIT 71.9x 0.0x -16.3x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 0.0x 5.1x
EV/FCF 44.7x 0.0x -13.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 66.3x 0.0x -13.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.29 -0.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRABQFINMRT
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.5% -7.8% 174.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.6% 3.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.6% – 5,402%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 69.9% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 340.0% -41.5% 45.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% 3.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 837.5% -47.1% 38.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.1% -1.2% -38.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 82.0% -40.9% 60.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 4.9% 35.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -82.1% -16.1% 44.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.4% 8.8% -20.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.7% -16.1% 45.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.6% 8.9% -20.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRABQFINMRT
Gross margin 43.6% – 63.8%
EBITDA margin 8.7% – -24.9%
Operating margin 3.2% 28.1% -31.2%
Pretax margin 13.9% 31.1% -74.9%
Net margin 15.3% 22.2% -74.9%
FCF margin 5.2% 52.6% -37.9%
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% 52.6% -38.2%
Return on equity 7.9% 14.8% –
Return on assets 4.2% 6.8% -136.6%
Return on invested capital 1.5% 17.5% –
Return on capital employed 1.7% 13.6% -105.8%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.3x 1.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 2.4x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% – 17.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRABQFINMRT
Debt / assets 15.1% 4.1% 328.6%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.1x -1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -6.5x – -7.2x
Debt / FCF 10.5x 0.3x -5.4x
Liabilities / assets 49.7% 53.3% 359.1%
Equity / assets 50.3% 46.7% -259.1%
Interest coverage 1.1x 8.7x –
Current ratio 1.5x 2.2x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.4x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.3x 0.9x
Altman Z-score -0.27 – -7.68

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRABQFINMRT
Dividend yield – 22.3% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 22.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRABQFINMRT
Forward P/E 16.9xFY2026 2.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 $2.84FY2026 $-0.32FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +166.7%FY2026 -54.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +12.5% -10.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.07BFY2026 $1.84BFY2026 $82.00MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 -33.0%FY2026 +109.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +33.7% -13.1% +72.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRABQFINMRT
Held by institutions 75.6% 61.8% –
Institutions holding 483 158 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +3.0% –
Institutions buying 231 71 –
Institutions selling 168 64 –
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.11 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRABQFINMRT
GRAB 1.00 0.22 -0.07
QFIN 0.22 1.00 0.04
MRT -0.07 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRAB, QFIN and MRT?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.11B, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) $750.86M, Marti Technologies (MRT) $153.68M.

Which stock is cheaper, GRAB, QFIN and MRT?

Qfin Holdings (QFIN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.5x, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) 1.4x, Marti Technologies (MRT) -3.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) is cheapest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 16.9x, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) 2.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Marti Technologies (MRT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) -7.8%, Marti Technologies (MRT) +174.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Qfin Holdings (QFIN) has the highest net margin (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) 22.2%, Marti Technologies (MRT) -74.9%). On return on invested capital, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) leads (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) 17.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marti Technologies (MRT) returned the most: Grab Holdings (GRAB) -53.7%, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) -79.4%, Marti Technologies (MRT) -17.0%. Over five years, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) compounded fastest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) -27.2%/yr, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) -24.1%/yr, Marti Technologies (MRT) -27.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.7%, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) 58.8%, Marti Technologies (MRT) 56.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRAB, QFIN and MRT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Qfin Holdings (QFIN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.