GRAB vs MRT vs CPNG Stock Comparison

Grab Holdings, Marti Technologies and Coupang Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.72 -13.1% 1M -55.6% 1Y
Market cap
$11.23B
P/E
19.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
4 wins
MRT Marti Technologies, Inc.
$1.98 -7.5% 1M -17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$157.66M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$52.32M
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins
CPNG Coupang, Inc.
$13.90 +0.1% 1M -56.2% 1Y
Market cap
$25.42B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$35.46B
Div. yield
–
Online Retail Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Grab Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Grab Holdings 4, Marti Technologies 3, Coupang 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRABMRTCPNGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.23B $157.66M $25.42B CPNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.7x -4.0x -33.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.0x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.5% +174.4% +9.9% MRT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.3% -74.9% -2.2% GRAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% — -10.6% GRAB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -7.2x 49.4x MRT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -55.6% -17.5% -56.2% MRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.2%/yr -27.5%/yr -14.2%/yr CPNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.6% 56.0% 48.0% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 25/100 32/100 GRAB

Percentile Scorecard

GRABMRTCPNG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRABMRTCPNG
Valuation 47 #89 of 167 9 #152 of 167 11 #93 of 104
Growth 80 #32 of 153 59 #64 of 153 10 #89 of 99
Profitability 45 #84 of 153 16 #128 of 153 22 #77 of 98
Financial Health 51 #89 of 179 15 #153 of 179 32 #77 of 112
Shareholder Returns – – 87 #10 of 72
Overall 56 25 32
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • MRT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • CPNG ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRABMRTCPNGSPY
1 month -13.1%-7.5%+0.1% -0.2%
3 months -21.2%+18.6%-10.0% +3.9%
6 months -29.5%-5.3%-31.7% +8.2%
Year to date -45.5%-16.5%-41.1% +12.9%
1 year -55.6%-17.5%-56.2% +12.3%
3 years -10.2%+296.0%-18.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year -3.5%+58.3%-6.5% +23.3%
5 years -78.1%-80.0%-53.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year -26.2%-27.5%-14.2% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureGRABMRTCPNGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.6%56.0%48.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.5%55.9%50.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.021.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.44-0.31-1.17 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.5%-96.8%-69.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.6%-24.7%-56.7% -1.2%
52-week high $6.12$2.63$32.13 $779.14
52-week low $2.71$1.30$13.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRABMRTCPNG
P/E now vs peer median 19.5xmedian 17.3x -3.9xmedian 17.3x -32.6xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.4x 3.3xmedian 1.4x 0.7xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.6xmedian 14.2x -20.3xmedian 14.2x -301.4xmedian 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 55.9xmedian 11.5x -8.6xmedian 11.5x 251.6xmedian 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.8x -2.0xmedian 1.8x 8.3xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.40 -0.11median 0.40 0.58median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRABMRTCPNG
Revenue $3.73B $52.32M $35.46B
Gross profit $1.63B $33.36M $10.06B
Operating income $120.00M -$16.33M -$628.00M
Net income $525.00M -$70.58M -$767.00M
Free cash flow $193.00M -$19.81M $99.00M
R&D $417.00M $3.04M –
EPS (diluted) $0.14 $-0.50 $-0.43
Cash & equivalents $2.86B $12.50M $6.11B
Total debt $2.99B $106.33M $2.60B
Shares (diluted) 4.21B 78.05M 1.80B
Enterprise value -$3.89B $128.37M -$538.13M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRABMRTCPNG
P/E 19.5x -3.9x -32.6x
P/FCF 55.9x -8.6x 251.6x
P/Operating cash flow 83.0x -8.5x 17.5x
P/S 2.9x 3.3x 0.7x
P/B 1.6x -2.0x 8.3x
P/Tangible book 1.6x -2.0x 8.8x
EV/EBITDA 26.6x -20.3x -301.4x
EV/EBIT 72.2x -16.2x -34.1x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 5.0x 0.6x
EV/FCF 44.9x -13.3x 216.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 66.6x -13.2x 15.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.11 0.58

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRABMRTCPNG
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.5% 174.4% 9.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.6% – 17.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.6% 5,402% 4.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 69.9% – 22.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 340.0% 45.7% -186.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% – -52.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 837.5% 38.6% -310.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.1% -38.7% -55.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 82.0% 60.5% -316.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 35.1% -55.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -82.1% 44.4% -25.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.4% -20.4% -10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.7% 45.0% -87.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.6% -20.1% -55.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRABMRTCPNG
Gross margin 43.6% 63.8% 28.4%
EBITDA margin 8.7% -24.9% -0.2%
Operating margin 3.2% -31.2% -1.8%
Pretax margin 13.9% -74.9% -1.7%
Net margin 15.3% -74.9% -2.2%
FCF margin 5.2% -37.9% 0.3%
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% -38.2% 4.0%
Return on equity 7.9% – -22.2%
Return on assets 4.2% -136.6% -4.4%
Return on invested capital 1.5% – -10.6%
Return on capital employed 1.7% -105.8% -9.3%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.8x 2.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 0.3x -1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% 17.9% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRABMRTCPNG
Debt / assets 15.1% 328.6% 15.0%
Debt / equity 0.3x -1.3x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -7.2x 49.4x
Debt / FCF 10.5x -5.4x 26.3x
Liabilities / assets 49.7% 359.1% 82.8%
Equity / assets 50.3% -259.1% 17.2%
Interest coverage 1.1x – -8.3x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.4x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.9x 0.6x
Altman Z-score -0.27 -7.69 2.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRABMRTCPNG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 4.4%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 4.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRABMRTCPNG
Forward P/E 17.0xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 $-0.32FY2026 $-0.51FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +166.7%FY2026 – -563.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.5% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.07BFY2026 $82.00MFY2026 $36.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 +109.0%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +33.7% +72.1% +23.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRABMRTCPNG
Held by institutions 75.6% – 81.8%
Institutions holding 483 – 588
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% – -2.8%
Institutions buying 231 – 262
Institutions selling 168 – 243
Buyers to sellers 1.38 – 1.08

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRABMRTCPNG
GRAB 1.00 -0.08 0.30
MRT -0.08 1.00 -0.04
CPNG 0.30 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRAB, MRT and CPNG?

Coupang (CPNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.23B, Marti Technologies (MRT) $157.66M, Coupang (CPNG) $25.42B.

Which company is growing faster?

Marti Technologies (MRT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%, Marti Technologies (MRT) +174.4%, Coupang (CPNG) +9.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) has the highest net margin (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%, Marti Technologies (MRT) -74.9%, Coupang (CPNG) -2.2%). On return on invested capital, Grab Holdings (GRAB) leads (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%, Coupang (CPNG) -10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marti Technologies (MRT) returned the most: Grab Holdings (GRAB) -55.6%, Marti Technologies (MRT) -17.5%, Coupang (CPNG) -56.2%. Over five years, Coupang (CPNG) compounded fastest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) -26.2%/yr, Marti Technologies (MRT) -27.5%/yr, Coupang (CPNG) -14.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.6%, Marti Technologies (MRT) 56.0%, Coupang (CPNG) 48.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRAB, MRT and CPNG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grab Holdings (GRAB) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.