GPK vs PKG vs SON Stock Comparison

Graphic Packaging Holding, Packaging Corp Of America and Sonoco Products Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SUZ) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PKG Packaging Corp Of America
$253.80 +7.0% 1M +23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$22.39B
P/E
30.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.82B
Div. yield
–
Paper Packaging Basic Materials
5 wins
SON Sonoco Products Co
$49.29 -1.5% 1M +22.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.90B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.37B
Div. yield
–
Paper Packaging Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Packaging Corp Of America leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Packaging Corp Of America 5, Graphic Packaging Holding 2, Sonoco Products 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGPKPKGSONLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.57B $22.39B $4.90B PKG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.3x 30.8x -21.6x GPK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.5x 23.2x 9.7x SON
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.0% +12.0% +3.6% PKG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.2% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -49.2% +23.9% +22.1% PKG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.1%/yr +13.4%/yr -3.2%/yr PKG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.4% 28.0% 33.7% PKG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 30/100 44/100 GPK

Percentile Scorecard

GPKPKGSON

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGPKPKGSON
Valuation 93 #2 of 16 13 #14 of 16 67 #6 of 16
Growth 0 #16 of 16 53 #8 of 16 20 #13 of 16
Profitability 71 #5 of 15 – 43 #9 of 15
Financial Health 21 #12 of 15 – 29 #11 of 15
Shareholder Returns 85 #3 of 14 23 #11 of 14 62 #6 of 14
Overall 54 30 44
  • GPK ranked among 17 companies in Packaging
  • PKG ranked among 17 companies in Packaging
  • SON ranked among 17 companies in Packaging

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGPKPKGSONSPY
1 month -6.5%+7.0%-1.5% -0.8%
3 months -21.3%+0.5%-16.0% +3.5%
6 months -8.6%+19.4%-1.9% +7.0%
Year to date -41.8%+23.1%+12.9% +12.2%
1 year -49.2%+23.9%+22.1% +13.0%
3 years -58.1%+69.0%-2.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year -25.2%+19.1%-0.9% +23.1%
5 years -55.8%+87.4%-15.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year -15.1%+13.4%-3.2% +11.0%
10 years -29.5%+213.1%-1.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year -3.4%+12.1%-0.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGPKPKGSONSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.4%28.0%33.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.0%25.8%36.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.890.710.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.040.850.66 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.0%-32.7%-41.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.5%-1.4%-18.6% -1.8%
52-week high $17.37$257.38$60.55 $779.14
52-week low $8.24$191.68$39.27 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGPKPKGSON
P/E now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 19.3x 30.9xmedian 19.3x -21.6xmedian 19.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.7x 2.3xmedian 0.7x 0.7xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 9.7x —median 9.7x —median 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 15.7x 28.1xmedian 15.7x 13.9xmedian 15.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x 1.7xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median -0.39median 0.82 -12.62median 0.82 0.62median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGPKPKGSON
Revenue $8.64B $9.82B $7.37B
Gross profit $1.34B $2.02B $1.49B
Operating income $504.00M $1.10B $202.22M
Net income $194.00M – -$226.60M
Free cash flow $189.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.65 $8.17 $-2.28
Cash & equivalents $205.00M – $183.10M
Total debt $5.67B – –
Shares (diluted) 296.70M 89.00M 99.78M
Enterprise value $1.80B $22.39B $4.90B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGPKPKGSON
P/E 13.4x 30.9x -21.6x
P/FCF 13.7x 28.1x 13.9x
P/Operating cash flow 3.3x – 7.7x
P/S 0.3x 2.3x 0.7x
P/B 0.8x – 1.7x
P/Tangible book 1.0x – 14.6x
EV/EBITDA 7.5x – –
EV/EBIT 16.0x – –
EV/Revenue 0.9x 2.3x 0.7x
EV/FCF 42.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 10.2x – 7.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.39 -12.62 0.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGPKPKGSON
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.0% 12.0% 3.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.7% 7.8% 18.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -26.6% 5.5% -1.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -13.6% 5.1% 13.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -45.9% -11.6% -63.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -24.2% -0.2% -30.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -63.7% – -136.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -35.0% – -35.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -63.1% -18.0% -136.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -34.1% -2.4% -35.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 3.1% – -6.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.1% – -7.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 147.8% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGPKPKGSON
Gross margin 15.5% – –
EBITDA margin 12.4% – –
Operating margin 5.8% – –
Pretax margin 2.9% – –
Net margin 2.2% – –
FCF margin 2.2% – –
Operating cash flow margin 9.2% – 8.6%
Return on equity 6.0% – -7.1%
Return on assets 1.7% – -2.1%
Return on invested capital 4.3% – –
Return on capital employed 5.3% – –
Asset turnover 0.7x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.1x – -2.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGPKPKGSON
Debt / assets 48.6% – –
Debt / equity 1.8x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 5.1x – –
Debt / FCF 30.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 72.2% – 72.2%
Equity / assets 27.8% – 27.8%
Interest coverage 2.0x – –
Current ratio 1.4x – 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.5x – –
Cash ratio 0.1x – –
Altman Z-score 1.34 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGPKPKGSON
Dividend yield 5.0% 2.2% 4.3%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 5.0% 2.2% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGPKPKGSON
Forward P/E 13.5xFY2026 23.2xFY2026 9.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.65FY2026 $10.92FY2026 $5.09FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -63.9%FY2026 +11.0%FY2026 -10.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +44.6% +32.1% +17.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.24BFY2026 $9.55BFY2026 $7.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.4%FY2026 +6.2%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% +18.1% -5.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGPKPKGSON
Held by institutions 100.0% 97.9% 97.9%
Institutions holding 499 901 507
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.3% +1.6% +13.2%
Institutions buying 322 456 264
Institutions selling 130 291 160
Buyers to sellers 2.48 1.57 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GPKPKGSON
GPK 1.00 0.45 0.44
PKG 0.45 1.00 0.46
SON 0.44 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GPK, PKG and SON?

Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) $2.57B, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) $22.39B, Sonoco Products (SON) $4.90B.

Which stock is cheaper, GPK, PKG and SON?

Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) 13.3x, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) 30.8x, Sonoco Products (SON) -21.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sonoco Products (SON) is cheapest (Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) 13.5x, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) 23.2x, Sonoco Products (SON) 9.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) +0.0%, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) +12.0%, Sonoco Products (SON) +3.6%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) returned the most: Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) -49.2%, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) +23.9%, Sonoco Products (SON) +22.1%. Over five years, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) compounded fastest (Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) -15.1%/yr, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) +13.4%/yr, Sonoco Products (SON) -3.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) has been the steadiest (Graphic Packaging Holding (GPK) 47.4%, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) 28.0%, Sonoco Products (SON) 33.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GPK, PKG and SON?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Packaging Corp Of America (PKG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.