GNVR vs PAHC vs RDGL Stock Comparison

Genvor, Phibro Animal Health and Vivos Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GNVR Genvor Inc
$0.75 -25.0% 1M -62.5% 1Y
Market cap
$27.31M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Crop Protection and Seeds Basic Materials
RDGL Vivos Inc
$0.04 -20.0% 1M -42.9% 1Y
Market cap
$20.06M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$68.38K
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Phibro Animal Health leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Phibro Animal Health 6, Vivos 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGNVRPAHCRDGLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.31M $1.55B $20.06M PAHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.8x 15.5x -6.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.2x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +17.1% +144.3% RDGL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.6% -4,483.9% PAHC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -62.5% -8.0% -42.9% PAHC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +11.6%/yr -16.8%/yr PAHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 280.8% 55.5% 120.8% PAHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 13/100 68/100 25/100 PAHC

Percentile Scorecard

GNVRPAHCRDGL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGNVRPAHCRDGL
Valuation 10 #85 of 94 92 #54 of 625 6 #214 of 227
Growth 31 #63 of 91 85 #90 of 602 13 #190 of 219
Profitability – 86 #81 of 551 2 #201 of 206
Financial Health 0 #95 of 95 26 #485 of 656 88 #30 of 238
Shareholder Returns 10 #63 of 70 54 #170 of 365 14 #115 of 134
Overall 13 68 25
  • GNVR ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • PAHC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • RDGL ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGNVRPAHCRDGLSPY
1 month -25.0%+11.4%-20.0% -0.2%
3 months +275.0%+5.5%-33.3% +3.9%
6 months +36.4%-29.3%-42.9% +8.2%
Year to date -25.0%+2.7%-42.9% +12.9%
1 year -62.5%-8.0%-42.9% +12.3%
3 years —+256.4%-33.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+52.8%-12.7% +23.3%
5 years —+73.0%-60.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+11.6%-16.8% +10.9%
10 years —+49.0%-96.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+4.1%-28.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGNVRPAHCRDGLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 280.8%55.5%120.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 460.5%59.8%285.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.640.75-0.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.22-0.14-0.35 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.5%-57.9%-84.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -62.5%-35.6%-55.6% -1.2%
52-week high $2.00$59.58$0.09 $779.14
52-week low $0.20$28.52$0.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGNVRPAHCRDGL
P/E now vs peer median -7.8xmedian 22.0x 15.6xmedian 17.2x -5.9xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.4x 1.0xmedian 9.0x 266.5xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.4x 8.2xmedian 16.3x —median 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -25.9xmedian 15.1x 157.7xmedian 18.7x -8.9xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median -10.1xmedian 1.6x 4.0xmedian 2.2x 11.0xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.73median 1.66 0.35median 0.33 -4.79median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGNVRPAHCRDGL
Revenue – $1.52B $68.38K
Gross profit – $512.52M -$59.76K
Operating income -$4.01M $194.40M -$3.17M
Net income -$3.45M $99.72M -$3.07M
Free cash flow -$1.05M $9.87M -$2.06M
R&D $386.20K – $352.23K
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $2.43 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $196.52K $61.42M $1.56M
Total debt $563.79K $2.49B –
Shares (diluted) 36.08M 40.96M 452.72M
Enterprise value $26.88M $1.23B $10.37M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGNVRPAHCRDGL
P/E -7.8x 15.6x -5.9x
P/FCF -25.9x 157.7x -8.9x
P/Operating cash flow -25.9x 22.6x -8.9x
P/S – 1.0x 266.5x
P/B -10.1x 4.0x 11.0x
P/Tangible book -10.1x 4.4x 11.0x
EV/EBITDA – 8.2x –
EV/EBIT -6.9x 10.8x -5.3x
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 243.7x
EV/FCF -26.1x 211.9x -8.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -26.1x 30.3x -8.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.73 0.35 -4.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGNVRPAHCRDGL
Revenue growth (1Y) – 17.1% 144.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 15.8% 23.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 28.1% -1,903%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 19.8% -113.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.3% 76.0% -21.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -55.6% 39.3% -7.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 41.0% 106.6% -5.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -38.4% 45.2% -7.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 55.1% 105.2% 4.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -10.7% 44.6% 1.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -151.3% -13.9% -22.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 73.0% -22.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -151.3% -76.4% -22.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 31.2% -22.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGNVRPAHCRDGL
Gross margin – 33.8% -87.4%
EBITDA margin – 16.8% –
Operating margin – 12.8% -4,629%
Pretax margin – 9.0% -4,484%
Net margin – 6.6% -4,484%
FCF margin – 0.6% -3,009%
Operating cash flow margin – 4.5% -3,009%
Return on equity – 26.7% -159.5%
Return on assets -1,412% 6.8% -147.3%
Return on invested capital – 14.2% –
Return on capital employed – 16.8% -161.2%
Asset turnover – 1.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.7x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% 1,505%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGNVRPAHCRDGL
Debt / assets 117.2% 41.1% –
Debt / equity -0.1x 1.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x –
Debt / FCF -0.3x 62.5x –
Liabilities / assets 969.3% 74.3% 11.1%
Equity / assets -869.3% 25.7% 88.9%
Interest coverage -37.1x 4.2x –
Current ratio 0.1x 3.0x 14.0x
Quick ratio 0.1x 1.1x 13.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.3x 13.2x
Altman Z-score – 3.10 -17.98

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGNVRPAHCRDGL
Dividend yield – 1.3% –
Net buyback yield -2.8% – -8.3%
Shareholder yield -2.8% 1.3% -8.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 197.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGNVRPAHCRDGL
Forward P/E – 11.2xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.42FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY – +6.2%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after – +9.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.53BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +0.6%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGNVRPAHCRDGL
Held by institutions – 51.5% –
Institutions holding – 208 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.1% –
Institutions buying – 117 –
Institutions selling – 73 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.60 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GNVRPAHCRDGL
GNVR 1.00 -0.05 -0.06
PAHC -0.05 1.00 0.07
RDGL -0.06 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GNVR, PAHC and RDGL?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Genvor (GNVR) $27.31M, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.55B, Vivos (RDGL) $20.06M.

Which company is growing faster?

Vivos (RDGL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +17.1%, Vivos (RDGL) +144.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has the highest net margin (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 6.6%, Vivos (RDGL) -4,483.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) returned the most: Genvor (GNVR) -62.5%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -8.0%, Vivos (RDGL) -42.9%. Over five years, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) compounded fastest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +11.6%/yr, Vivos (RDGL) -16.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 0.01%, Vivos (RDGL) 0.00%. Genvor (GNVR) and Vivos (RDGL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has been the steadiest (Genvor (GNVR) 280.8%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 55.5%, Vivos (RDGL) 120.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GNVR, PAHC and RDGL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.