GMTL vs NUAI vs CPAC Stock Comparison

Guardian Metal Resources, New ERA Energy & Digital and Cementos Pacasmayo Saa Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Cementos Pacasmayo Saa leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Cementos Pacasmayo Saa 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGMTLNUAICPACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $275.68M $326.42M $1.10B CPAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -29.9x -6.3x 25.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 14.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +65.4% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -4,382.5% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.3x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — -48.2% +73.0% CPAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +15.7%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 90.8% 144.0% 52.9% CPAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 24/100 44/100 CPAC

Percentile Scorecard

GMTLNUAICPAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGMTLNUAICPAC
Valuation 31 #112 of 162 3 #96 of 99 33 #7 of 10
Growth – 19 #79 of 97 –
Profitability – 1 #95 of 96 –
Financial Health 95 #9 of 164 91 #10 of 102 0 #9 of 9
Shareholder Returns – 4 #73 of 76 100 #1 of 8
Overall – 24 44
  • GMTL ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • NUAI ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • CPAC ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGMTLNUAICPACSPY
1 month -49.1%-54.0%+4.7% -0.2%
3 months -47.7%-26.0%+5.5% +3.9%
6 months -72.5%-15.1%+18.7% +8.2%
Year to date —+10.9%+22.6% +12.9%
1 year —-48.2%+73.0% +12.3%
3 years —-69.3%+158.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-32.6%+37.3% +23.3%
5 years ——+107.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year ——+15.7% +10.9%
10 years ——+35.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+3.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGMTLNUAICPACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 90.8%144.0%52.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 91.2%142.0%31.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.283.780.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.331.38 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.4%-97.2%-36.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.9%-59.7%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $20.64$8.06$12.77 $779.14
52-week low $4.88$2.37$6.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGMTLNUAICPAC
P/E now vs peer median -29.9xmedian 13.3x -6.1xmedian 13.0x 25.1xmedian 20.3x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.2x 291.2xmedian 2.1x 1.8xmedian 1.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.3x -7.0xmedian 5.9x —median 9.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -49.8xmedian 14.7x -14.7xmedian 11.1x 14.9xmedian 31.6x
P/B now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 2.2x 2.5xmedian 1.5x 3.1xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.31 —median 2.27 —median 2.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGMTLNUAICPAC
Revenue – $1.19M –
Operating income – -$45.06M –
Net income – -$53.93M –
Free cash flow – -$23.50M –
EPS (diluted) – $-0.53 –
Cash & equivalents $52.46M $69.82M $15.93M
Total debt – $76.81M $261.69M
Shares (diluted) 57.79M 98.17M –
Enterprise value $275.68M $233.44M $878.80M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGMTLNUAICPAC
P/E -29.9x -6.1x 25.1x
P/FCF -49.8x -14.7x 14.9x
P/Operating cash flow – -19.3x –
P/S – 291.2x 1.8x
P/B 3.2x 2.5x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 5.7x 2.5x 3.1x
EV/EBITDA – -7.0x –
EV/EBIT – -6.4x –
EV/Revenue – 244.0x –
EV/FCF – -12.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow – -16.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGMTLNUAICPAC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 65.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -221.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – -187.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) – 52.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -99.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -140.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGMTLNUAICPAC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – -3,505% –
Operating margin – -3,791% –
Pretax margin – -4,383% –
Net margin – -4,383% –
FCF margin – -1,977% –
Operating cash flow margin – -1,506% –
Return on equity – -69.4% –
Return on assets – -39.9% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -36.2% –
Asset turnover – 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1,269% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGMTLNUAICPAC
Debt / assets – 8.7% 28.4%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.3x –
Debt / FCF – -0.6x –
Liabilities / assets 3.7% 20.7% 61.6%
Equity / assets 96.3% 79.3% 38.4%
Interest coverage – -10.9x –
Current ratio 15.3x 14.2x 1.1x
Quick ratio 14.8x 11.6x 0.4x
Cash ratio 14.4x 11.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 4.88 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGMTLNUAICPAC
Dividend yield – – 4.8%
Net buyback yield – -45.9% –
Shareholder yield – -45.9% 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGMTLNUAICPAC
Forward P/E – – 14.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.25FY2027 $-0.63FY2026 $0.91FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +68.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +5.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2027 $7.96MFY2027 $680.11MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +800.0%FY2027 +7.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3,425.5% -2.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGMTLNUAICPAC
Held by institutions 10.6% 51.4% 1.4%
Institutions holding 47 128 26
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.7% +309.7% +76.6%
Institutions buying 36 105 17
Institutions selling 10 16 4
Buyers to sellers 3.60 6.56 4.25

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GMTLNUAICPAC
GMTL 1.00 0.33 0.02
NUAI 0.33 1.00 0.09
CPAC 0.02 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GMTL, NUAI and CPAC?

Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Guardian Metal Resources (GMTL) $275.68M, New ERA Energy & Digital (NUAI) $326.42M, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) $1.10B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) returned the most: New ERA Energy & Digital (NUAI) -48.2%, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) +73.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) has been the steadiest (Guardian Metal Resources (GMTL) 90.8%, New ERA Energy & Digital (NUAI) 144.0%, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) 52.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GMTL, NUAI and CPAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.