GMTL vs CPAC vs CMP Stock Comparison

Guardian Metal Resources, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa and Compass Minerals International Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Cementos Pacasmayo Saa leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cementos Pacasmayo Saa 5, Compass Minerals International 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGMTLCPACCMPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $297.92M $1.09B $958.14M CPAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -30.5x 25.1x 52.1x CPAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.0x 25.8x CPAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +5.5% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 1.4% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 5.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +71.9% +19.7% CPAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +15.3%/yr -19.7%/yr CPAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 91.1% 53.0% 51.2% CMP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 44/100 53/100 CMP

Percentile Scorecard

GMTLCPACCMP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGMTLCPACCMP
Valuation 29 #115 of 162 33 #7 of 10 73 #45 of 162
Growth – – 64 #53 of 147
Profitability – – 59 #51 of 122
Financial Health 95 #9 of 165 0 #9 of 9 17 #137 of 165
Shareholder Returns – 100 #1 of 8 –
Overall – 44 53
  • GMTL ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • CPAC ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials
  • CMP ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGMTLCPACCMPSPY
1 month -48.0%+4.7%-1.7% -0.8%
3 months -53.2%+6.2%-25.3% +3.5%
6 months -74.3%+18.7%-16.2% +7.0%
Year to date —+22.6%+13.2% +12.2%
1 year —+71.9%+19.7% +13.0%
3 years —+158.5%-9.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+37.3%-3.1% +23.1%
5 years —+104.0%-66.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+15.3%-19.7% +11.0%
10 years —+33.0%-69.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+2.9%-11.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGMTLCPACCMPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 91.1%53.0%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 91.7%31.4%53.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.290.041.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —1.360.38 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.4%-36.7%-89.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.3%0.0%-33.7% -1.8%
52-week high $20.64$12.77$33.51 $779.14
52-week low $4.88$6.38$16.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGMTLCPACCMP
P/E now vs peer median -30.5xmedian 12.8x 25.1xmedian 19.6x 51.0xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.1x 1.8xmedian 1.8x 0.7xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.0x —median 9.3x 7.0xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -50.9xmedian 15.2x 14.9xmedian 31.4x 12.0xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.1x 3.1xmedian 2.3x 3.5xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.29 —median 2.78 2.89median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGMTLCPACCMP
Revenue – – $1.29B
Gross profit – – $222.50M
Operating income – – $115.50M
Net income – – $18.40M
Free cash flow – – $77.90M
EPS (diluted) – – $0.44
Cash & equivalents $52.46M $15.93M $56.30M
Total debt – $2.77B $716.60M
Shares (diluted) 57.79M – 42.25M
Enterprise value $297.92M $878.31M $721.34M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACCMP
P/E -30.5x 25.1x 51.0x
P/FCF -50.9x 14.9x 12.0x
P/Operating cash flow – – 6.0x
P/S – 1.8x 0.7x
P/B 3.3x 3.1x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 5.8x 3.1x 3.6x
EV/EBITDA – – 7.0x
EV/EBIT – – 13.8x
EV/Revenue – – 1.2x
EV/FCF – – 20.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 10.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 2.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACCMP
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 29.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -1.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 800.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 11.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 115.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 18.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 115.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 17.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -18.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 16.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -33.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 97.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACCMP
Gross margin – – 17.2%
EBITDA margin – – 17.5%
Operating margin – – 8.9%
Pretax margin – – 3.2%
Net margin – – 1.4%
FCF margin – – 6.0%
Operating cash flow margin – – 12.1%
Return on equity – – 6.8%
Return on assets – – 1.4%
Return on invested capital – – 5.2%
Return on capital employed – – 10.4%
Asset turnover – – 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 8.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACCMP
Debt / assets – 28.4% 52.9%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 2.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.9x
Debt / FCF – – 9.2x
Liabilities / assets 3.7% 61.6% 80.5%
Equity / assets 96.3% 38.4% 19.5%
Interest coverage – – 52.5x
Current ratio 15.3x 1.1x 2.0x
Quick ratio 14.8x 0.4x 1.0x
Cash ratio 14.4x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 1.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACCMP
Dividend yield – 4.8% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 4.8% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGMTLCPACCMP
Forward P/E – 14.0xFY2026 25.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.25FY2027 $0.91FY2026 $0.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +68.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +5.5% +51.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2027 $680.11MFY2026 $1.21BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +7.8%FY2026 -2.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -2.3% +12.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGMTLCPACCMP
Held by institutions 10.6% 1.4% 91.8%
Institutions holding 47 26 230
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.7% +76.6% -4.3%
Institutions buying 36 17 130
Institutions selling 10 4 56
Buyers to sellers 3.60 4.25 2.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GMTLCPACCMP
GMTL 1.00 0.02 0.24
CPAC 0.02 1.00 0.15
CMP 0.24 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GMTL, CPAC and CMP?

Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Guardian Metal Resources (GMTL) $297.92M, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) $1.09B, Compass Minerals International (CMP) $958.14M.

Which stock is cheaper, GMTL, CPAC and CMP?

Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Guardian Metal Resources (GMTL) -30.5x, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) 25.1x, Compass Minerals International (CMP) 52.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) is cheapest (Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) 14.0x, Compass Minerals International (CMP) 25.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) returned the most: Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) +71.9%, Compass Minerals International (CMP) +19.7%. Over five years, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) compounded fastest (Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) +15.3%/yr, Compass Minerals International (CMP) -19.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Compass Minerals International (CMP) has been the steadiest (Guardian Metal Resources (GMTL) 91.1%, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) 53.0%, Compass Minerals International (CMP) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GMTL, CPAC and CMP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.