GMM vs FIG Stock Comparison

Global Mofy AI and Figma Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GMM Global Mofy AI Ltd
$1.03 -47.7% 1M -98.9% 1Y
Market cap
$609.10K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
FIG Figma, Inc.
$22.99 +10.2% 1M -56.7% 1Y
Market cap
$12.20B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.20B
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Figma leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Figma 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGMMFIGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $609.10K $12.20B FIG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -8.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 82.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +42.2% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -119.8% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -98.9% -56.7% FIG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 207.4% 74.8% FIG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 32/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

GMMFIG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGMMFIG
Valuation – 4 #28 of 29
Growth – 39 #17 of 27
Profitability – 4 #25 of 26
Financial Health 67 #11 of 31 80 #7 of 31
Shareholder Returns – –
Overall – 32
  • GMM ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • FIG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGMMFIGSPY
1 month -47.7%+10.2% -0.2%
3 months -58.3%-5.7% +3.9%
6 months -98.4%+33.8% +8.2%
Year to date -98.3%-38.5% +12.9%
1 year -98.9%-56.7% +12.3%
3 years -99.8%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -87.5%— +23.3%

Risk

MeasureGMMFIGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 207.4%74.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 224.3%69.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.551.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.48-0.76 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.9%-86.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -98.9%-56.7% -1.2%
52-week high $97.50$53.14 $779.14
52-week low $0.87$16.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGMMFIG
P/E now vs peer median —median 31.0x -8.5xmedian 31.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.4x 10.2xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.3x -7.4xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.6x —median 15.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 3.0x 8.3xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.74 —median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGMMFIG
Revenue – $1.20B
Gross profit – $971.13M
Operating income – -$1.45B
Net income – -$1.41B
R&D – $1.13B
EPS (diluted) – $-2.72
Cash & equivalents $2.83M $445.85M
Total debt $16.17M –
Shares (diluted) 281.73K 527.46M
Enterprise value -$23.68M $5.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGMMFIG
P/E – -8.5x
P/FCF – –
P/Operating cash flow – –
P/S – 10.2x
P/B 0.0x 8.3x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 8.3x
EV/EBITDA – -7.4x
EV/EBIT – -7.3x
EV/Revenue – 8.8x
EV/FCF – –
EV/Operating cash flow – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGMMFIG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 42.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 31.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -63.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – –
Net income growth (1Y) – -96.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – –
EPS growth (1Y) – 15.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGMMFIG
Gross margin – 81.1%
EBITDA margin – -119.1%
Operating margin – -120.9%
Pretax margin – -115.4%
Net margin – -119.8%
FCF margin – –
Operating cash flow margin – –
Return on equity – -94.2%
Return on assets – -59.9%
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed – -93.8%
Asset turnover – 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – –
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGMMFIG
Debt / assets 4.9% –
Debt / equity 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 32.6% 37.1%
Equity / assets 67.4% 62.9%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 1.9x 2.5x
Quick ratio 1.1x 2.3x
Cash ratio 0.2x 2.1x
Altman Z-score – 6.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGMMFIG
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGMMFIG
Forward P/E – 82.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -37.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +21.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.43BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +35.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +34.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGMMFIG
Held by institutions – 81.2%
Institutions holding – 373
Change in shares held, QoQ – +12.2%
Institutions buying – 257
Institutions selling – 64
Buyers to sellers – 4.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GMMFIG
GMM 1.00 -0.07
FIG -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GMM and FIG?

Figma (FIG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Global Mofy AI (GMM) $609.10K, Figma (FIG) $12.20B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figma (FIG) returned the most: Global Mofy AI (GMM) -98.9%, Figma (FIG) -56.7%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Figma (FIG) has been the steadiest (Global Mofy AI (GMM) 207.4%, Figma (FIG) 74.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do GMM and FIG move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.07, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, GMM and FIG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Figma (FIG) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.