GLXZ vs PLTK vs NTES Stock Comparison

Galaxy Gaming, Playtika Holding and NetEase Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLXZ Galaxy Gaming, Inc.
$1.63 +1.9% 1M -41.8% 1Y
Market cap
$41.33M
P/E
8.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.16M
Div. yield
–
Video Games Technology
2 wins
PLTK Playtika Holding Corp.
$2.06 -3.3% 1M -45.8% 1Y
Market cap
$785.68M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.83B
Div. yield
4.85%
Video Games Technology
2 wins
NTES NetEase, Inc.
$114.09 -1.1% 1M -21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$72.84B
P/E
16.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.70B
Div. yield
2.57%
Video Games Technology
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

NetEase leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (NetEase 8, Galaxy Gaming 2, Playtika Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLXZPLTKNTESLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $41.33M $785.68M $72.84B NTES
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.7x -2.8x 16.3x GLXZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.1x 11.9x PLTK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.1% +5.8% +9.8% NTES
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.8% -9.9% 26.6% NTES
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 36.2% -5.0% 22.7% GLXZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x 18.2x -1.4x NTES
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 4.85% 2.57% PLTK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -41.8% -45.8% -21.9% NTES
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.2%/yr -41.1%/yr +2.7%/yr NTES
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.8% 60.1% 33.2% NTES
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 44/100 64/100 NTES

Percentile Scorecard

GLXZPLTKNTES

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLXZPLTKNTES
Valuation 86 #24 of 167 83 #30 of 167 60 #67 of 167
Growth 70 #47 of 153 14 #132 of 153 45 #84 of 153
Profitability 97 #5 of 153 48 #80 of 153 95 #8 of 153
Financial Health 28 #130 of 179 19 #146 of 179 85 #27 of 179
Shareholder Returns 27 #69 of 94 59 #39 of 94 34 #62 of 94
Overall 62 44 64
  • GLXZ ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • PLTK ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • NTES ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLXZPLTKNTESSPY
1 month +1.9%-3.3%-1.1% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%-48.2%-10.4% +3.9%
6 months -11.9%-40.8%+2.1% +8.2%
Year to date -43.0%-47.8%-17.1% +12.9%
1 year -41.8%-45.8%-21.9% +12.3%
3 years -38.3%-75.5%+6.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -14.9%-37.4%+2.2% +23.3%
5 years -63.4%-92.9%+14.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -18.2%-41.1%+2.7% +10.9%
10 years +213.5%—+113.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +12.1%—+7.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGLXZPLTKNTESSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.8%60.1%33.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.2%66.4%32.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.260.940.49 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.86-0.76-0.66 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.0%-93.1%-52.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.7%-52.9%-22.7% -1.2%
52-week high $2.95$4.37$147.56 $779.14
52-week low $1.50$2.04$109.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLXZPLTKNTES
P/E now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 17.3x -2.8xmedian 17.3x 16.3xmedian 17.3x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.4x 0.3xmedian 1.4x 4.4xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 14.2x 25.5xmedian 14.2x 10.3xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 11.5x 1.9xmedian 11.5x 9.8xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 1.8x -2.0xmedian 1.8x 3.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.40 0.07median 0.40 2.27median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLXZPLTKNTES
Revenue $31.16M $2.83B $16.70B
Gross profit $30.61M $2.08B $11.22B
Operating income $8.33M -$97.60M $5.90B
Net income $4.92M -$279.70M $4.75B
Free cash flow $7.41M $419.10M $7.46B
R&D $605.98K $402.80M $2.59B
EPS (diluted) $0.19 $-0.73 $6.91
Cash & equivalents $4.76M $438.50M $3.36B
Total debt $155.53M $2.38B $5.39B
Shares (diluted) 26.13M 382.20M 643.63M
Enterprise value $24.08M -$1.89B $31.72B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLXZPLTKNTES
P/E 8.7x -2.8x 16.3x
P/FCF 5.6x 1.9x 9.8x
P/Operating cash flow 5.5x 1.7x 9.9x
P/S 1.3x 0.3x 4.4x
P/B -2.7x -2.0x 3.0x
P/Tangible book -1.7x -1.0x 3.0x
EV/EBITDA 6.2x 25.5x 10.3x
EV/EBIT 8.9x -28.0x 10.8x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 1.0x 3.8x
EV/FCF 10.0x 6.5x 8.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.9x 6.0x 8.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 0.07 2.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLXZPLTKNTES
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.1% 5.8% 9.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 3.1% 5.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.2% 7.5% 16.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.8% 3.9% 11.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 67.8% -129.5% 23.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.4% -29.6% 22.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 218.5% -423.7% -2.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 210.5% -42.4% 9.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 218.8% -418.1% -4.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 208.1% -41.8% 7.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 64.5% -4.3% 13.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.2% -1.8% 19.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.6% -5.2% 12.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.3% -1.0% 17.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLXZPLTKNTES
Gross margin 98.2% 73.5% 67.2%
EBITDA margin 38.6% 3.8% 37.2%
Operating margin 26.7% -3.4% 35.3%
Pretax margin 16.1% -9.3% 34.9%
Net margin 15.8% -9.9% 26.6%
FCF margin 23.8% 14.8% 44.7%
Operating cash flow margin 24.1% 16.1% 44.0%
Return on equity – – 19.6%
Return on assets 18.2% -8.0% 14.0%
Return on invested capital 36.2% -5.0% 22.7%
Return on capital employed 41.7% -3.4% 23.0%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x -1.6x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 2.3% 2.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLXZPLTKNTES
Debt / assets 140.6% 72.4% 5.4%
Debt / equity -2.5x -6.0x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x 18.2x -1.4x
Debt / FCF 5.1x 5.7x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 156.2% 112.1% 28.0%
Equity / assets -56.2% -12.1% 72.0%
Interest coverage 2.6x -0.6x –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.1x 3.5x
Quick ratio 1.7x 1.0x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.7x 1.3x
Altman Z-score 1.07 0.38 7.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLXZPLTKNTES
Dividend yield – 4.9% 2.6%
Net buyback yield -0.1% – 0.0%
Shareholder yield -0.1% 4.9% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLXZPLTKNTES
Forward P/E – 7.1xFY2026 11.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.29FY2026 $9.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +15.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +134.5% +7.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.94BFY2026 $17.11BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +6.7%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -1.2% +7.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLXZPLTKNTES
Held by institutions 0.9% 15.6% 9.2%
Institutions holding 2 172 458
Change in shares held, QoQ – -0.9% +1.9%
Institutions buying 0 92 261
Institutions selling 0 59 121
Buyers to sellers – 1.56 2.16

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLXZPLTKNTES
GLXZ 1.00 -0.01 0.01
PLTK -0.01 1.00 0.19
NTES 0.01 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLXZ, PLTK and NTES?

NetEase (NTES) is the largest by market capitalisation: Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) $41.33M, Playtika Holding (PLTK) $785.68M, NetEase (NTES) $72.84B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLXZ, PLTK and NTES?

Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 8.7x, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -2.8x, NetEase (NTES) 16.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Playtika Holding (PLTK) is cheapest (Playtika Holding (PLTK) 7.1x, NetEase (NTES) 11.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

NetEase (NTES) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) +2.1%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) +5.8%, NetEase (NTES) +9.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetEase (NTES) has the highest net margin (Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 15.8%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -9.9%, NetEase (NTES) 26.6%). On return on invested capital, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) leads (Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 36.2%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -5.0%, NetEase (NTES) 22.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetEase (NTES) returned the most: Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) -41.8%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -45.8%, NetEase (NTES) -21.9%. Over five years, NetEase (NTES) compounded fastest (Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) -18.2%/yr, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -41.1%/yr, NetEase (NTES) +2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Playtika Holding (PLTK) has the highest dividend yield: Playtika Holding (PLTK) 4.85%, NetEase (NTES) 2.57%. Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetEase (NTES) has been the steadiest (Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 48.8%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) 60.1%, NetEase (NTES) 33.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLXZ, PLTK and NTES?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetEase (NTES) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.