GLW vs TMO vs DD Stock Comparison

Corning, Thermo Fisher Scientific and DuPont de Nemours Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLW Corning Inc /Ny
$127.80 -18.4% 1M +46.2% 1Y
Market cap
$109.18B
P/E
57.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.96B
Div. yield
0.01%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
4 wins
DD DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
$136.27 +3.4% 1M +302.0% 1Y
Market cap
$18.72B
P/E
340.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.99B
Div. yield
0.02%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

DuPont de Nemours leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (DuPont de Nemours 5, Corning 4, Thermo Fisher Scientific 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLWTMODDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $109.18B $257.69B $18.72B TMO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 57.5x 36.4x 340.4x TMO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.0x 26.4x 20.1x DD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +19.4% +8.3% +3.3% GLW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.2% — 0.8% GLW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.4% — 8.8% GLW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.5x — 0.7x DD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.02% DD
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +46.2% +19.6% +302.0% DD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.3%/yr +2.3%/yr +36.4%/yr DD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.7% 29.9% 114.1% TMO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 51/100 54/100 GLW

Percentile Scorecard

GLWTMODD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLWTMODD
Valuation 18 #77 of 94 49 #116 of 228 57 #41 of 94
Growth 99 #2 of 92 40 #133 of 221 45 #51 of 92
Profitability 81 #18 of 89 70 #63 of 208 73 #25 of 89
Financial Health 59 #40 of 97 – 76 #24 of 97
Shareholder Returns 28 #51 of 70 44 #77 of 137 19 #57 of 70
Overall 57 51 54
  • GLW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • TMO ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • DD ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLWTMODDSPY
1 month -18.4%+1.7%+3.4% -0.8%
3 months -10.8%+22.4%-2.6% +3.5%
6 months -23.9%+46.3%+191.9% +7.0%
Year to date +46.0%+18.2%+239.0% +12.2%
1 year +46.2%+19.6%+302.0% +13.0%
3 years +380.6%+58.7%+351.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +68.8%+16.7%+65.3% +23.1%
5 years +261.1%+11.8%+371.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +29.3%+2.3%+36.4% +11.0%
10 years +455.2%+362.6%+325.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +18.7%+16.6%+15.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGLWTMODDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.7%29.9%114.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.7%28.3%26.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.030.621.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.620.662.65 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.6%-41.5%-41.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.0%-1.7%-7.4% -1.8%
52-week high $255.69$696.55$147.23 $779.14
52-week low $78.03$438.34$34.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLWTMODD
P/E now vs peer median 58.0xmedian 21.6x 35.9xmedian 30.6x 336.7xmedian 21.6x
P/S now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 1.4x 5.3xmedian 3.0x 2.6xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 28.8xmedian 12.4x —median 17.5x 9.5xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 46.0xmedian 15.8x 34.0xmedian 23.3x 26.2xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 1.6x 4.6xmedian 2.4x 1.3xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.33median 1.66 4.74median 0.87 -4.40median 1.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLWTMODD
Revenue $16.96B $47.35B $6.99B
Gross profit $6.17B – $2.46B
Operating income $2.60B $8.47B $1.63B
Net income $2.07B $7.09B $62.00M
Free cash flow $2.40B – $702.00M
R&D $1.14B $1.40B $18.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.17 $19.06 $0.40
Cash & equivalents $2.50B $5.46B $1.74B
Total debt $8.47B – $3.13B
Shares (diluted) 875.00M 371.00M 136.80M
Enterprise value $101.75B $257.69B $13.60B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLWTMODD
P/E 58.0x 35.9x 336.7x
P/FCF 46.0x 34.0x 26.2x
P/Operating cash flow 28.1x 27.2x 17.7x
P/S 6.5x 5.3x 2.6x
P/B 8.4x 4.6x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 8.8x 6.9x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 28.8x – 9.5x
EV/EBIT 44.7x – 12.1x
EV/Revenue 6.8x 5.3x 2.8x
EV/FCF 48.5x – 28.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.6x 27.2x 19.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.33 4.74 -4.40

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLWTMODD
Revenue growth (1Y) 19.4% 8.3% 3.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 2.9% -17.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.9% – 7.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.6% – -17.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 51.7% 12.8% 8.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.6% 7.2% -13.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 128.4% 7.9% 136.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 44.1% 6.2% -76.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 129.3% 9.7% 129.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 43.7% 7.6% -76.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 79.5% 21.9% 1,101%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.4% 4.5% -12.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 100.6% – 378.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 111.0% – -7.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLWTMODD
Gross margin 36.4% – 35.1%
EBITDA margin 23.8% – 29.7%
Operating margin 15.3% – 23.4%
Pretax margin 14.2% – 6.8%
Net margin 11.2% – 0.8%
FCF margin 14.1% – 10.0%
Operating cash flow margin 23.1% 19.7% 14.9%
Return on equity 16.3% 13.2% 0.6%
Return on assets 6.5% 6.2% 0.4%
Return on invested capital 10.4% – 8.8%
Return on capital employed 10.0% – 8.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.4x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.3x 16.8x
Stock comp / revenue 2.5% – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLWTMODD
Debt / assets 25.7% – 14.8%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.5x – 0.7x
Debt / FCF 3.5x – 4.5x
Liabilities / assets 60.2% – 34.1%
Equity / assets 39.8% 47.9% 65.9%
Interest coverage 7.3x – 7.2x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.8x 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.9x – 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x – 0.9x
Altman Z-score 5.00 – 0.67

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLWTMODD
Dividend yield 0.9% 0.3% 1.8%
Net buyback yield -0.5% – -0.7%
Shareholder yield 0.4% 0.3% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% – 672.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 41.4% – 59.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) -0.3% – -36.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.9% – -13.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLWTMODD
Forward P/E 37.0xFY2026 26.4xFY2026 20.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.45FY2026 $25.91FY2026 $6.77FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +36.9%FY2026 +13.3%FY2026 +34.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +24.1% +2.0% +22.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.34BFY2026 $50.12BFY2026 $7.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.8%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 +6.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +31.0% -2.8% +7.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLWTMODD
Held by institutions 73.0% 90.2% 73.0%
Institutions holding 2,680 2,621 1,118
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +0.8% -5.7%
Institutions buying 1,474 1,141 1,090
Institutions selling 949 1,144 27
Buyers to sellers 1.55 1.00 40.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLWTMODD
GLW 1.00 -0.03 0.21
TMO -0.03 1.00 0.05
DD 0.21 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLW, TMO and DD?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Corning (GLW) $109.18B, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) $257.69B, DuPont de Nemours (DD) $18.72B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLW, TMO and DD?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Corning (GLW) 57.5x, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 36.4x, DuPont de Nemours (DD) 340.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, DuPont de Nemours (DD) is cheapest (Corning (GLW) 37.0x, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 26.4x, DuPont de Nemours (DD) 20.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Corning (GLW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Corning (GLW) +19.4%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +8.3%, DuPont de Nemours (DD) +3.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Corning (GLW) has the highest net margin (Corning (GLW) 11.2%, DuPont de Nemours (DD) 0.8%). On return on invested capital, Corning (GLW) leads (Corning (GLW) 10.4%, DuPont de Nemours (DD) 8.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year DuPont de Nemours (DD) returned the most: Corning (GLW) +46.2%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +19.6%, DuPont de Nemours (DD) +302.0%. Over five years, DuPont de Nemours (DD) compounded fastest (Corning (GLW) +29.3%/yr, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +2.3%/yr, DuPont de Nemours (DD) +36.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

DuPont de Nemours (DD) has the highest dividend yield: Corning (GLW) 0.01%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 0.00%, DuPont de Nemours (DD) 0.02%. Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) has been the steadiest (Corning (GLW) 74.7%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 29.9%, DuPont de Nemours (DD) 114.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLW, TMO and DD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, DuPont de Nemours (DD) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.