GLOB vs KD vs MWC Stock Comparison

Globant, Kyndryl Holdings and Micware Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLOB Globant S.A.
$42.96 +24.5% 1M -31.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.88B
P/E
16.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.45B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
6 wins
KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
$14.15 +22.0% 1M -51.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.08B
P/E
35.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.97B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
4 wins
MWC Micware Co., Ltd.
$1.51 -10.1% 1M
Market cap
$84.77M
P/E
8.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Globant leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Globant 6, Kyndryl Holdings 4, Micware 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLOBKDMWCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.88B $3.08B $84.77M KD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.8x 35.9x 8.2x MWC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.6x 7.3x — KD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.3% -0.6% — KD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.6% 0.6% — GLOB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.1% 1.2% — GLOB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 1.9x — GLOB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -31.4% -51.0% — GLOB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -32.8%/yr -15.1%/yr — KD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.5% 95.2% 174.2% GLOB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 52/100 — GLOB

Percentile Scorecard

GLOBKDMWC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLOBKDMWC
Valuation 94 #4 of 50 63 #19 of 50 74 #14 of 50
Growth 39 #28 of 45 61 #18 of 45 –
Profitability 65 #15 of 41 40 #25 of 41 –
Financial Health 75 #16 of 62 7 #58 of 62 39 #38 of 62
Shareholder Returns – 90 #4 of 30 –
Overall 68 52 –
  • GLOB ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • KD ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • MWC ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLOBKDMWCSPY
1 month +24.5%+22.0%-10.1% -0.2%
3 months +22.4%+6.0%-5.0% +3.9%
6 months +4.7%+5.1%— +8.2%
Year to date -34.3%-46.7%— +12.9%
1 year -31.4%-51.0%— +12.3%
3 years -74.6%+1.4%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -36.7%+0.5%— +23.3%
5 years -86.3%-55.8%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -32.8%-15.1%— +10.9%
10 years -2.4%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year -0.2%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGLOBKDMWCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.5%95.2%174.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.4%123.2%158.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.720.620.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.52-0.54— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -92.2%-75.6%-86.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.7%-51.1%-81.6% -1.2%
52-week high $71.21$28.92$8.20 $779.14
52-week low $27.73$10.59$1.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLOBKDMWC
P/E now vs peer median 16.8xmedian 17.4x 35.9xmedian 17.4x 8.2xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 10.7x 4.0xmedian 10.7x —median 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 11.5x 20.8xmedian 11.5x 8.4xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.4x 2.6xmedian 1.4x 1.6xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median -1.66median 1.51 1.26median 1.51 —median 1.51

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLOBKDMWC
Revenue $2.45B $14.97B –
Gross profit $846.14M $3.27B –
Operating income $187.55M $203.00M –
Net income $119.56M $87.00M –
Free cash flow $427.56M $148.00M –
EPS (diluted) $2.52 $0.39 –
Cash & equivalents $163.77M $2.11B $52.99M
Total debt $903.43M $4.85B $47.54M
Shares (diluted) 45.01M 220.60M 56.07M
Enterprise value $1.16B -$4.25B $33.15M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLOBKDMWC
P/E 16.8x 35.9x 8.2x
P/FCF 4.4x 20.8x 8.4x
P/Operating cash flow 5.4x 4.0x –
P/S 0.8x 0.2x 0.5x
P/B 0.9x 2.6x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 1.0x 3.1x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 7.8x 4.0x –
EV/EBIT 9.7x 28.7x –
EV/Revenue 0.7x 0.4x –
EV/FCF 4.3x 39.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 5.2x 7.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.66 1.26 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLOBKDMWC
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.3% -0.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.5% -4.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.1% 4.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.3% 7.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 4.5% 851.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -1.8% 29.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 6.9% -70.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 28.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 1.9% -68.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -10.1% 28.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.2% -12.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.4% 36.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.0% -38.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 34.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLOBKDMWC
Gross margin 34.5% 21.8% –
EBITDA margin 9.5% 9.8% –
Operating margin 7.7% 1.4% –
Pretax margin 6.5% 1.7% –
Net margin 4.6% 0.6% –
FCF margin 17.4% 1.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 14.2% 5.1% –
Return on equity 9.2% 7.1% –
Return on assets 6.1% 0.7% –
Return on invested capital 8.1% 1.2% –
Return on capital employed 6.8% 3.2% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.9x 8.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLOBKDMWC
Debt / assets 3.6% 40.3% 30.3%
Debt / equity 0.1x 4.2x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 1.9x –
Debt / FCF 0.3x 32.8x –
Liabilities / assets 32.7% 90.3% 66.4%
Equity / assets 67.3% 9.7% 33.6%
Interest coverage 4.9x 2.0x –
Current ratio 1.8x 0.8x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.6x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.4x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 2.61 1.16 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLOBKDMWC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 9.9% –
Shareholder yield – 9.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLOBKDMWC
Forward P/E 7.6xFY2026 7.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.67FY2026 $1.95FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -7.7%FY2026 +33.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +13.6% +30.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.36BFY2026 $15.74BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -3.6%FY2026 +4.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +1.0% -4.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLOBKDMWC
Held by institutions 100.0% 86.9% –
Institutions holding 291 673 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +26.5% +7.0% –
Institutions buying 186 255 –
Institutions selling 71 211 –
Buyers to sellers 2.62 1.21 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLOBKDMWC
GLOB 1.00 0.31 0.00
KD 0.31 1.00 -0.08
MWC 0.00 -0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLOB, KD and MWC?

Kyndryl Holdings (KD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Globant (GLOB) $1.88B, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) $3.08B, Micware (MWC) $84.77M.

Which stock is cheaper, GLOB, KD and MWC?

Micware (MWC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Globant (GLOB) 16.8x, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 35.9x, Micware (MWC) 8.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) is cheapest (Globant (GLOB) 7.6x, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 7.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kyndryl Holdings (KD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Globant (GLOB) -1.3%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) -0.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Globant (GLOB) has the highest net margin (Globant (GLOB) 4.6%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 0.6%). On return on invested capital, Globant (GLOB) leads (Globant (GLOB) 8.1%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 1.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Globant (GLOB) returned the most: Globant (GLOB) -31.4%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) -51.0%. Over five years, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) compounded fastest (Globant (GLOB) -32.8%/yr, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) -15.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Globant (GLOB) has been the steadiest (Globant (GLOB) 60.5%, Kyndryl Holdings (KD) 95.2%, Micware (MWC) 174.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLOB, KD and MWC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Globant (GLOB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.