GLNG vs YPF vs MPC Stock Comparison

Golar Lng, Ypf Sociedad Anonima and Marathon Petroleum Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLNG Golar Lng Ltd
$45.21 -8.9% 1M +18.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.71B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$523.38M
Div. yield
–
LNG and Gas Processing Energy
4 wins
YPF Ypf Sociedad Anonima
$49.24 -5.5% 1M +82.7% 1Y
Market cap
$18.99B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.34T
Div. yield
–
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
4 wins
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corp
$470.49 +19.6% 1M +139.8% 1Y
Market cap
$125.80B
P/E
14.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$156.18B
Div. yield
0.01%
Oil Refining Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ypf Sociedad Anonima leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ypf Sociedad Anonima 4, Golar Lng 4, Marathon Petroleum 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLNGYPFMPCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.71B $18.99B $125.80B MPC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.8x 0.0x 14.7x YPF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 40.7x 6.6x 6.9x YPF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +109.6% -9.3% +15.9% GLNG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 31.3% 18.2% 5.5% GLNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.6% 10.2% 19.7% GLNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.3x 4.9x 1.5x MPC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.6% +82.7% +139.8% MPC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.2%/yr +61.5%/yr +48.1%/yr YPF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.2% 37.2% 36.1% GLNG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 66/100 60/100 YPF

Percentile Scorecard

GLNGYPFMPC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLNGYPFMPC
Valuation 29 #25 of 35 93 #8 of 99 27 #17 of 23
Growth 91 #4 of 34 96 #5 of 97 67 #7 of 19
Profitability 85 #6 of 34 44 #54 of 96 94 #2 of 18
Financial Health 79 #8 of 35 30 #72 of 102 57 #11 of 24
Shareholder Returns 27 #23 of 31 – 53 #9 of 18
Overall 62 66 60
  • GLNG ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • YPF ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • MPC ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLNGYPFMPCSPY
1 month -8.9%-5.5%+19.6% -0.8%
3 months -7.7%-3.3%+50.6% +3.5%
6 months -14.4%+14.5%+107.1% +7.0%
Year to date +21.5%+36.2%+189.3% +12.2%
1 year +18.6%+82.7%+139.8% +13.0%
3 years +101.5%+346.0%+222.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +26.3%+64.7%+47.7% +23.1%
5 years +245.6%+996.7%+611.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +28.2%+61.5%+48.1% +11.0%
10 years +95.4%+167.2%+963.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +6.9%+10.3%+26.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGLNGYPFMPCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.2%37.2%36.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.3%36.8%34.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.13-0.06-0.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.682.233.87 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.1%-48.8%-45.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.2%-12.6%-3.0% -1.8%
52-week high $57.36$56.35$485.05 $779.14
52-week low $35.33$32.78$162.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLNGYPFMPC
P/E now vs peer median 28.5xmedian 21.0x 0.0xmedian 13.5x 15.9xmedian 9.5x
P/S now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 2.7x 0.0xmedian 2.1x 0.8xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.9xmedian 11.0x 4.9xmedian 5.9x 9.0xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 16.6x 10.6xmedian 11.0x 10.2xmedian 9.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.6x 0.0xmedian 1.5x 5.1xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.88median 1.92 —median 2.27 -15.47median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLNGYPFMPC
Revenue $523.38M $9.34T $156.18B
Gross profit $343.33M $4.19T $21.79B
Operating income $273.22M $2.56T $14.13B
Net income $226.50M $2.25T $10.31B
Free cash flow $583.87M $1.83B $12.90B
R&D $14.62M $102.00M –
EPS (diluted) $1.49 – $29.50
Cash & equivalents $870.50M $1.95T $7.77B
Total debt $2.68B $14.96T $33.26B
Shares (diluted) 109.49M – 290.00M
Enterprise value $1.07B $12.61B $109.56B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLNGYPFMPC
P/E 28.5x 0.0x 15.9x
P/FCF 7.8x 10.6x 10.2x
P/Operating cash flow 10.8x 2.7x 7.7x
P/S 8.8x 0.0x 0.8x
P/B 2.4x 0.0x 5.1x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 0.0x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA 18.9x 4.9x 9.0x
EV/EBIT 23.4x 5.9x 11.2x
EV/Revenue 12.2x 1.6x 1.0x
EV/FCF 10.9x 8,182x 12.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.1x 2,081x 9.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.88 – -15.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLNGYPFMPC
Revenue growth (1Y) 109.6% -9.3% 15.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.3% 598.7% -0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 147.7% -1.7% 71.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.9% 747.9% -5.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 1,754% 123.7% 163.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 104.0% 843.9% -9.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 894.0% 3,481% 174.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.5% 813.5% -10.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 2,539% – 324.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% – -1.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.1% 34.5% 164.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 8.0% 4.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -5.5% 2,961% 253.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 60.4% -37.4% 1.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLNGYPFMPC
Gross margin 65.6% 44.9% 14.0%
EBITDA margin 64.6% 32.5% 11.2%
Operating margin 52.2% 27.4% 9.0%
Pretax margin 62.0% 27.1% 8.2%
Net margin 31.3% 18.2% 5.5%
FCF margin 111.6% 0.0% 8.3%
Operating cash flow margin 80.8% 0.1% 11.0%
Return on equity 1,387% 9.7% 42.0%
Return on assets 4.2% 3.8% 11.3%
Return on invested capital 22.6% 10.2% 19.7%
Return on capital employed 5.6% 5.7% 22.1%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 0.0x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.9% 0.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLNGYPFMPC
Debt / assets 50.1% 31.3% 35.3%
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.8x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.3x 4.9x 1.5x
Debt / FCF 4.6x 8,172x 2.6x
Liabilities / assets 63.6% 60.5% 72.7%
Equity / assets 36.4% 39.5% 27.3%
Interest coverage 16.5x 2,243x 10.4x
Current ratio 2.3x 31.0x 1.3x
Quick ratio 2.2x 12.2x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.8x 0.0x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – – 4.06

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLNGYPFMPC
Dividend yield 2.2% – 0.9%
Net buyback yield 0.7% – 3.7%
Shareholder yield 3.0% 0.0% 4.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 11.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 9.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -3.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLNGYPFMPC
Forward P/E 40.7xFY2026 6.6xFY2026 6.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.11FY2026 $7.50FY2026 $68.44FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -27.5%FY2026 – +539.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -53.2% -6.9% -13.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $409.44MFY2026 $20.37BFY2026 $192.95BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.0%FY2026 +10.4%FY2026 +42.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.6% +5.3% -9.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLNGYPFMPC
Held by institutions 81.4% 15.2% 75.7%
Institutions holding 311 166 1,930
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% +29.8% -0.3%
Institutions buying 153 96 855
Institutions selling 105 44 699
Buyers to sellers 1.46 2.18 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLNGYPFMPC
GLNG 1.00 0.30 0.29
YPF 0.30 1.00 0.30
MPC 0.29 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLNG, YPF and MPC?

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Golar Lng (GLNG) $4.71B, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) $18.99B, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) $125.80B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLNG, YPF and MPC?

Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Golar Lng (GLNG) 28.8x, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) 0.0x, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 14.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) is cheapest (Golar Lng (GLNG) 40.7x, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) 6.6x, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 6.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Golar Lng (GLNG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Golar Lng (GLNG) +109.6%, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) -9.3%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) +15.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Golar Lng (GLNG) has the highest net margin (Golar Lng (GLNG) 31.3%, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) 18.2%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 5.5%). On return on invested capital, Golar Lng (GLNG) leads (Golar Lng (GLNG) 22.6%, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) 10.2%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 19.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marathon Petroleum (MPC) returned the most: Golar Lng (GLNG) +18.6%, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) +82.7%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) +139.8%. Over five years, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) compounded fastest (Golar Lng (GLNG) +28.2%/yr, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) +61.5%/yr, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) +48.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Golar Lng (GLNG) 0.00%, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) 0.00%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 0.01%. Golar Lng (GLNG) and Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Golar Lng (GLNG) has been the steadiest (Golar Lng (GLNG) 27.2%, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) 37.2%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 36.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLNG, YPF and MPC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ypf Sociedad Anonima (YPF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.