GLGI vs WM vs MTD Stock Comparison

Greystone Logistics, Waste Management and Mettler Toledo International Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WM Waste Management Inc
$235.63 +13.9% 1M +10.2% 1Y
Market cap
$92.06B
P/E
30.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.07B
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 6, Mettler Toledo International 4, Greystone Logistics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLGIWMMTDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.00M $92.06B $34.25B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.6x 30.0x 37.8x WM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 27.2x 33.5x WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -59.9% +5.2% +6.9% MTD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -43.8% — 21.9% MTD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -37.9% — 47.1% MTD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -4.6x — 1.5x GLGI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -78.0% +10.2% +18.8% MTD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -24.6%/yr +8.4%/yr +2.7%/yr WM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 116.5% 21.4% 33.0% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 10/100 61/100 51/100 WM

Percentile Scorecard

GLGIWMMTD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLGIWMMTD
Valuation 29 #145 of 203 60 #7 of 16 12 #178 of 203
Growth 0 #188 of 188 77 #4 of 14 38 #117 of 188
Profitability 6 #173 of 183 92 #2 of 14 100 #1 of 183
Financial Health 7 #203 of 217 13 #14 of 16 24 #166 of 217
Shareholder Returns – – 80 #32 of 153
Overall 10 61 51
  • GLGI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • MTD ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLGIWMMTDSPY
1 month -15.4%+13.9%+11.5% -0.2%
3 months -12.0%-1.6%+21.3% +3.9%
6 months +37.5%+3.6%+33.5% +8.2%
Year to date -62.1%+7.2%+20.9% +12.9%
1 year -78.0%+10.2%+18.8% +12.3%
3 years -77.1%+46.0%+72.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -38.8%+13.5%+20.0% +23.3%
5 years -75.6%+49.6%+14.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -24.6%+8.4%+2.7% +10.9%
10 years -12.0%+271.9%+323.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year -1.3%+14.0%+15.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGLGIWMMTDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 116.5%21.4%33.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 150.7%20.8%33.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.08-0.420.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.670.480.57 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.7%-18.7%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -76.3%-4.4%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $0.93$246.51$1,685.92 $779.14
52-week low $0.15$196.77$1,025.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLGIWMMTD
P/E now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 25.2x 30.8xmedian 33.2x 37.5xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 3.3x 8.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -7.0xmedian 14.0x —median 14.5x 28.4xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 21.7x 23.2xmedian 16.4x 42.3xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.3x 9.6xmedian 3.0x 2,851xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 1.32 3.00median 2.81 5.42median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLGIWMMTD
Revenue $22.12M $26.07B $4.13B
Gross profit -$2.92M – $2.49B
Operating income -$8.43M $4.80B $1.23B
Net income -$9.70M $3.07B $905.61M
Free cash flow -$5.06M – $863.97M
R&D – – $208.01M
EPS (diluted) $-0.36 $7.63 $44.91
Cash & equivalents $360.53K $247.00M $51.40M
Total debt $46.58M – $2.11B
Shares (diluted) 27.27M 402.40M 20.17M
Enterprise value $3.99M $92.06B $34.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLGIWMMTD
P/E -0.6x 30.8x 37.5x
P/FCF -1.2x 23.2x 42.3x
P/Operating cash flow -1.8x 8.2x 37.5x
P/S 0.3x 3.6x 8.8x
P/B 0.7x 9.6x 2,851x
P/Tangible book 0.7x 14.9x -144.2x
EV/EBITDA -7.0x – 28.4x
EV/EBIT -2.1x – 31.4x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 3.6x 9.3x
EV/FCF -3.5x – 44.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -5.3x 8.2x 39.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 3.00 5.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLGIWMMTD
Revenue growth (1Y) -59.9% 5.2% 6.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -28.0% 9.0% 1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -133.7% – 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -31.4% – 2.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -472.2% 17.9% 6.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -51.5% 10.5% 0.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,158% 19.7% 9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -50.9% 10.0% 3.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,653% 20.3% 12.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -56.5% 10.3% 6.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -132.8% 95.1% 2.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -31.4% 37.6% 0.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -169.9% – 1.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -49.9% – 0.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLGIWMMTD
Gross margin -13.2% – 60.3%
EBITDA margin -11.3% – 32.9%
Operating margin -38.1% – 29.7%
Pretax margin -42.4% – 26.5%
Net margin -43.8% – 21.9%
FCF margin -22.9% – 20.9%
Operating cash flow margin -15.0% 43.8% 23.6%
Return on equity -94.7% 31.0% –
Return on assets -26.5% 6.6% 24.7%
Return on invested capital -37.9% – 47.1%
Return on capital employed -39.6% – 49.8%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 3.7x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLGIWMMTD
Debt / assets 33.5% – 57.5%
Debt / equity 1.3x – 164.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -4.6x – 1.5x
Debt / FCF -2.4x – 2.4x
Liabilities / assets 75.0% 78.8% 99.7%
Equity / assets 25.0% 21.2% 0.3%
Interest coverage – – 17.7x
Current ratio 0.4x 0.8x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.2x – 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.0x – 0.0x
Altman Z-score -1.82 – 11.95

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLGIWMMTD
Dividend yield – 1.5% –
Net buyback yield – – 2.1%
Shareholder yield – 1.5% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLGIWMMTD
Forward P/E – 27.2xFY2026 33.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $8.65FY2026 $50.31FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +15.3%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +9.5% +5.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $25.84BFY2026 $4.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +2.6%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +12.0% +3.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLGIWMMTD
Held by institutions – 82.3% 94.4%
Institutions holding – 2,348 804
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.8% +3.1%
Institutions buying – 1,094 331
Institutions selling – 901 324
Buyers to sellers – 1.21 1.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLGIWMMTD
GLGI 1.00 0.11 0.06
WM 0.11 1.00 0.08
MTD 0.06 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLGI, WM and MTD?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) $6.00M, Waste Management (WM) $92.06B, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) $34.25B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLGI, WM and MTD?

Waste Management (WM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -0.6x, Waste Management (WM) 30.0x, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 37.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Management (WM) is cheapest (Waste Management (WM) 27.2x, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 33.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Mettler Toledo International (MTD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -59.9%, Waste Management (WM) +5.2%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) +6.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mettler Toledo International (MTD) has the highest net margin (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -43.8%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 21.9%). On return on invested capital, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) leads (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -37.9%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 47.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mettler Toledo International (MTD) returned the most: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -78.0%, Waste Management (WM) +10.2%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) +18.8%. Over five years, Waste Management (WM) compounded fastest (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -24.6%/yr, Waste Management (WM) +8.4%/yr, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) +2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) 116.5%, Waste Management (WM) 21.4%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 33.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLGI, WM and MTD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.