GLDM vs IAU vs SIVR Stock Comparison

World Gold Trust, Ishares Gold Trust and abrdn Silver ETF Trust Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLDM World Gold Trust
$81.06 -1.7% 1M +2.8% 1Y
Market cap
$27.74B
P/E
8.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Asset Management Financial Services
2 wins
IAU Ishares Gold Trust
$76.99 -1.8% 1M +2.6% 1Y
Market cap
$25.70B
P/E
4.6x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Asset Management Financial Services
2 wins
SIVR abrdn Silver ETF Trust
$49.34 -15.4% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.55B
P/E
10.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Asset Management Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

World Gold Trust leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (World Gold Trust 2, Ishares Gold Trust 2, abrdn Silver ETF Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLDMIAUSIVRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.74B $25.70B $3.55B GLDM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.8x 4.6x 10.9x IAU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2.8% +2.6% +7.7% SIVR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.5%/yr +17.4%/yr +16.2%/yr GLDM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.0% 28.9% 66.4% IAU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — — –

Percentile Scorecard

GLDMIAUSIVR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLDMIAUSIVR
Valuation 91 #20 of 200 – 99 #3 of 200
Growth – – –
Profitability – – –
Financial Health – – –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – – –
  • GLDM ranked among 210 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • IAU ranked among 210 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • SIVR ranked among 210 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLDMIAUSIVRSPY
1 month -1.7%-1.8%-15.4% -5.9%
3 months -3.5%-3.6%-15.9% -4.6%
6 months -12.9%-13.0%-34.4% +0.2%
Year to date -5.0%-5.1%-27.1% +7.5%
1 year +2.8%+2.6%+7.7% +8.2%
3 years +106.7%+105.7%+123.8% +68.3%
3 years, per year +27.4%+27.2%+30.8% +19.0%
5 years +124.3%+122.8%+112.0% +56.5%
5 years, per year +17.5%+17.4%+16.2% +9.4%
10 years —+206.5%+174.1% +251.5%
10 years, per year —+11.9%+10.6% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureGLDMIAUSIVRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.0%28.9%66.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.3%32.3%80.6% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.780.781.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.100.090.12 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.2%-28.2%-58.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.1%-24.2%-55.5% -5.9%
52-week high $106.77$101.57$110.87 $779.14
52-week low $76.64$72.92$45.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLDMIAUSIVR
P/E now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 33.2x 4.6xmedian 33.2x 10.9xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.4x —median 4.4x —median 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.0x —median 13.0x —median 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.5x —median 14.5x —median 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.8x —median 1.8x 0.7xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.77 —median 0.77 —median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLDMIAUSIVR
Net income $3.12B $6.18B –
Enterprise value -$75.32B $25.70B -$6.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLDMIAUSIVR
P/E 8.8x 4.6x 10.9x
P/FCF – – –
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S – – –
P/B 1.0x – 0.7x
P/Tangible book 1.0x – 0.7x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – – –
EV/Revenue – – –
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLDMIAUSIVR
Revenue growth (1Y) – – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -11.8% -40.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 129.5% – –
EPS growth (1Y) – – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLDMIAUSIVR
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity 11.0% – –
Return on assets 10.9% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLDMIAUSIVR
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 0.2% – 0.0%
Equity / assets 99.8% – 100.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLDMIAUSIVR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLDMIAUSIVR

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLDMIAUSIVR
Held by institutions 51.1% 48.7% 22.8%
Institutions holding 910 1,906 355
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.2% -2.8% -4.3%
Institutions buying 513 837 147
Institutions selling 262 627 122
Buyers to sellers 1.96 1.33 1.20

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLDMIAUSIVR
GLDM 1.00 1.00 0.84
IAU 1.00 1.00 0.84
SIVR 0.84 0.84 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLDM, IAU and SIVR?

World Gold Trust (GLDM) is the largest by market capitalisation: World Gold Trust (GLDM) $27.74B, Ishares Gold Trust (IAU) $25.70B, abrdn Silver ETF Trust (SIVR) $3.55B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLDM, IAU and SIVR?

Ishares Gold Trust (IAU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (World Gold Trust (GLDM) 8.8x, Ishares Gold Trust (IAU) 4.6x, abrdn Silver ETF Trust (SIVR) 10.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year abrdn Silver ETF Trust (SIVR) returned the most: World Gold Trust (GLDM) +2.8%, Ishares Gold Trust (IAU) +2.6%, abrdn Silver ETF Trust (SIVR) +7.7%. Over five years, World Gold Trust (GLDM) compounded fastest (World Gold Trust (GLDM) +17.5%/yr, Ishares Gold Trust (IAU) +17.4%/yr, abrdn Silver ETF Trust (SIVR) +16.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ishares Gold Trust (IAU) has been the steadiest (World Gold Trust (GLDM) 29.0%, Ishares Gold Trust (IAU) 28.9%, abrdn Silver ETF Trust (SIVR) 66.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLDM, IAU and SIVR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, World Gold Trust (GLDM) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.