GLAI vs GRRR vs ITMSF Stock Comparison

Global AI, Gorilla Technology and Intermap Technologies Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLAI Global AI, Inc.
$0.95 +18.7% 1M +115.9% 1Y
Market cap
$147.15M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$184.28K
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Gorilla Technology leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Gorilla Technology 4, Intermap Technologies 2, Global AI 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLAIGRRRITMSFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $147.15M $204.70M $34.05M GRRR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -92.6x -4.1x -3.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 27.5x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +34.5% +50.4% -66.2% GRRR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -862.3% -35.4% -147.8% GRRR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -2.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x 1.8x ITMSF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +115.9% -49.8% -74.8% GLAI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +54.0%/yr -39.0%/yr -4.7%/yr GLAI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 254.1% 87.3% 84.7% ITMSF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 13/100 40/100 26/100 GRRR

Percentile Scorecard

GLAIGRRRITMSF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLAIGRRRITMSF
Valuation 25 #93 of 124 46 #68 of 124 19 #101 of 124
Growth 14 #97 of 113 73 #31 of 113 1 #112 of 113
Profitability 6 #103 of 110 32 #75 of 110 20 #88 of 110
Financial Health 8 #119 of 129 40 #78 of 129 64 #47 of 129
Shareholder Returns – 8 #62 of 67 –
Overall 13 40 26
  • GLAI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GRRR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLAIGRRRITMSFSPY
1 month +18.7%-39.7%-14.1% -0.8%
3 months -9.5%-30.3%-22.5% +3.5%
6 months +35.7%-34.5%-62.8% +7.0%
Year to date -5.9%-22.6%-59.6% +12.2%
1 year +115.9%-49.8%-74.8% +13.0%
3 years +295.8%+4.1%+37.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +58.2%+1.3%+11.2% +23.1%
5 years +763.6%-91.5%-21.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +54.0%-39.0%-4.7% +11.0%
10 years +216.7%—-21.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.2%—-2.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGLAIGRRRITMSFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 254.1%87.3%84.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 306.4%93.2%99.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.152.640.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.46-0.57-0.88 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -92.9%-99.4%-78.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.1%-61.2%-73.7% -1.8%
52-week high $4.15$21.78$2.09 $779.14
52-week low $0.35$7.44$0.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLAIGRRRITMSF
P/E now vs peer median -92.6xmedian 38.1x -3.8xmedian 38.1x -3.5xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 798.5xmedian 4.3x 1.6xmedian 4.3x 6.0xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -94.4xmedian 35.4x -2.3xmedian 35.4x -2.8xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -83.8xmedian 27.1x -33.4xmedian 27.1x -4.6xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median -43.3xmedian 3.4x 1.3xmedian 3.4x 2.3xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.36median 1.27 —median 1.27 —median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLAIGRRRITMSF
Revenue $184.28K $140.40M $6.65M
Gross profit $83.10K $24.27M –
Operating income -$1.59M -$51.78M -$9.75M
Net income -$1.59M -$51.45M -$9.82M
Free cash flow -$1.76M -$6.62M -$8.57M
R&D $1.82M $4.02M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $-2.23 $-0.16
Cash & equivalents $40.56K $179.36M $16.18M
Total debt – $6.95B $1.65M
Shares (diluted) 309.80M 22.25M 61.80M
Enterprise value $146.90M -$286.74M -$49.72M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLAIGRRRITMSF
P/E -92.6x -3.8x -3.5x
P/FCF -83.8x -33.4x -4.6x
P/Operating cash flow -88.9x -10.8x -5.6x
P/S 798.5x 1.6x 6.0x
P/B -43.3x 1.3x 2.3x
P/Tangible book -19.7x 1.3x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA -94.4x -2.3x -2.8x
EV/EBIT -92.6x -2.2x -2.5x
EV/Revenue 798.3x 0.8x 3.6x
EV/FCF -83.8x -17.4x -2.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -88.8x -5.6x -3.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.36 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLAIGRRRITMSF
Revenue growth (1Y) 34.5% 50.4% -66.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 44.2% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -26.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -1.3% 33.4% -1,317%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -555.5% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 2.1% 34.1% -1,584%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -405.8% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 51.0% 68.5% -1,313%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -255.6% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -96.3% 33.7% -365.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -529.9% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -103.9% 78.9% -216.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -542.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLAIGRRRITMSF
Gross margin 45.1% 17.3% –
EBITDA margin -845.7% -36.2% -128.3%
Operating margin -862.3% -36.9% -146.6%
Pretax margin -859.5% -32.9% -152.3%
Net margin -862.3% -35.4% -147.8%
FCF margin -952.7% -4.7% -129.0%
Operating cash flow margin -898.6% -14.6% -107.7%
Return on equity – -29.1% -51.9%
Return on assets -36.9% -15.7% -36.5%
Return on invested capital – -2.9% –
Return on capital employed – -30.8% -45.5%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 0.4x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 9.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLAIGRRRITMSF
Debt / assets – 18.8% 1.6%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – -11.1x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 176.0% 56.2% 32.0%
Equity / assets -76.0% 43.8% 68.0%
Interest coverage – -21.8x -180.5x
Current ratio 0.0x 2.2x 3.3x
Quick ratio 0.0x 2.1x 3.2x
Cash ratio 0.0x 1.2x 2.9x
Altman Z-score 5.87 0.37 -11.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLAIGRRRITMSF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -13.4% –
Shareholder yield – -13.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLAIGRRRITMSF
Forward P/E – – 27.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $-2.61FY2026 $0.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -396.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – – +350.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $201.05MFY2026 $32.39MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +98.4%FY2026 +205.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +217.5% +29.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLAIGRRRITMSF
Held by institutions – 26.6% –
Institutions holding – 71 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +79.3% –
Institutions buying – 50 –
Institutions selling – 13 –
Buyers to sellers – 3.85 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLAIGRRRITMSF
GLAI 1.00 -0.01 0.06
GRRR -0.01 1.00 0.09
ITMSF 0.06 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLAI, GRRR and ITMSF?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Global AI (GLAI) $147.15M, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) $204.70M, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $34.05M.

Which company is growing faster?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Global AI (GLAI) +34.5%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) +50.4%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) has the highest net margin (Global AI (GLAI) -862.3%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -35.4%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Global AI (GLAI) returned the most: Global AI (GLAI) +115.9%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -49.8%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -74.8%. Over five years, Global AI (GLAI) compounded fastest (Global AI (GLAI) +54.0%/yr, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -39.0%/yr, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) has been the steadiest (Global AI (GLAI) 254.1%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) 87.3%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLAI, GRRR and ITMSF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.